by BigTex » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 11:08:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ElijahJones', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') was watching a movie and during a diatribe against the world today the character mentioned a "preoccupation with abstraction" as one of the principal problems (two points to anyone who can name the film).
I think it's true that many of us have come to live almost exclusively in our "head space." We deal only in ideas, moving paper from desk to desk, working with computer screen shots, all of which are many steps removed from the actual production of products and services, and sometimes the product or service being produced is still many steps removed from a product or service that actually does anything useful.
What stops this drift toward more and more abstraction in the way we think and the mental space we occupy is when some part of the infrastructure supporting the abstract existence breaks down. Thus, when the electricity goes off or the network goes down we feel adrift, disconnected; it's a strange feeling.
PO will represent such a breakdown in the infrastructure supporting this ethereal kind of existence. It will be profoundly unsettling when people realize that in this case it's not that we don't know how to repair the machine, but rather that the machine has run out of gas and we can't afford to buy any more to refill it.
I read a science fiction story called "The Machine Stops" where an entire world was populated by people whose existence was almost entirely abstract. They essentially sat in their rooms and had a monitor in front of them where they worked, played, loved, lost...basically had the entire human experience abstractly. Then one day the supposedly perpetual motion machine that supported this world broke. No one knew how to fix it. Many went insane. The rest tried to respond, but realized they had no skills of any kind to either repair the machine or even feed themselves. In one sense they were brilliant, but only in terms of working with ideas; they had no skills for working with realities like raising food, building shelters, and creating tools.
Many people don't realize the degree to which they live in a world preoccupied with abstraction. For anyone who lives in such a world, an experience like camping can be profound because it just seems so "real" compared to the world they are used to.
The trip from the real to the abstract can be kind of fun. A person thinks to himself "my dad was a farmer and I am a banker; I'm better off than him." On the other hand, moving from a workd of abstraction to a world of reality is often considered a big step down: "I went from practicing law to working on a farm; I'm worse off."
It will be interesting to see how the dwellers in abstract worlds will fare as the infrastructure that supports the abstract world begins to come apart.
The welders, plumbers and carpenters will do fine, I think. The financial analysts, securities lawyers, image consultants and gossip columnists may have it a little rougher.
I will use the term in a more rigorous way. Abstraction is one of the key power pillars behind modern mathematics which has given us this world, not only the bad but the good as well. The seceret of abstraction is in how it allows us to see similarities between objects that would otherwise appear unrelated. The idea of a general mapping is very powerful. Imagine how little we would have progressed if Newton and Liebnitz had not invented calculus. Again imagine how much further we might have been if Archimedes had formalized his notions of infinitesimals way back in 265 BC? Abstraction as a knowledge tool is not the problem. Dissociation is the problem. We have released ourselves from any responsibility for the way our own life affects the lives of others. So long as we do our job using whatever methods, the money we make is the proof that we are justified in our habits. Oil is a vehicle for human addiction and vanity, the most pervasive and deadly ever faced by humans. Most who come under it's spell will not see their children's children survive it. Someone might argue that it could be used for good. The operative word there is "could." That sounds alot like the word "should", and the word "would", but not much like the word "did" or "will."
I agree that "abstraction as a knowledge tool is not the problem." It is the PREOCCUPATION that is the problem.
It is when people begin to imagine that gas comes from the gas station, food comes from the grocery store, money comes from the bank that the problem starts....it's as if some people imagine these things kind of "poof" into reality in the same way that ideas do.
The fact that dealing in abstraction pays so much better just aggravates the problem--why not become preoccupied with something so profitable?