Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

What would you do with: Absolute power?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Steps to take

Postby Roccland » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 00:11:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o rewording, how can you be a super-achiever?

good question.

I could send Aaron a check for a million and I could be an elite. Or buy the website off Aaron and just make myself elite, kind of like how murdock did it...

Otherwise, I think you have to achieve something.

Or, if you already are elite, then just ask Aaron.
He'll just stick you up there.


Well Matt told all of us he made 56K last year - so I doubt he is rich. Monte has almost 10,000 posts (I think we should throw him a party at 10,000), but he attained that over a mere 3 years...in three years from now we all could be close to 10,000 post...imagine the parties we could have...I digress

so what's the next level ... God?
500 MPH into a brick wall - me
User avatar
Roccland
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1604
Joined: Sat 16 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Steps to take

Postby Plantagenet » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 02:01:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ferrelgiraffe', 'T')elevision would have to have
1. Math channel
2. Physics channel
3. Chemistry channel
4. Biology channel
5. Test and quizzes channel like game shows.
6. Music channel
7. Free peoples channel

.



I suggest you add an Earth Science channel so people can become educated about the science of the peak oil and global climate change issues. 8)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Steps to take

Postby Plantagenet » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 02:06:23

If I were king I'd put a healthy tax on all imported oil....say $3 a gallon.

I'd dedicate most of the new tax money to improving mass transit (high speed inter-city train, light rail in the cities), and I'd put the rest of the money into a "Manhatten-style" project of new scientific research on energy and climate change problems. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Steps to take

Postby careinke » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 03:07:59

Our problems can be boiled down into two separate but related themes. Too many people, and over consumption. The US can probably support the current population on our own, we just need to reduce our over consumption and stabilize our population. So… if I were the dictator of America, here is what I would do…

First,
1. Eliminate all current taxes.
2. Stop the war on drugs.
3. Pull all the troops back home.
4. Stop all foreign aid.

Then,
1. Replace all current taxes with a tax on the sale of all new goods.
2. Double tax carbon based fuels.
3. Provide a tax pre-bate to all US Citizens over the age of 18, equal to twice the amount of taxes which would be paid at the poverty level.
4. Institute three years of mandatory service for all people on their 18th birthday. (Military, Infrastructure repair, health workers etc.)
5. Provide free health care for all US Citizens.
6. Mandatory sterilization for any couple having a Meth or Crack baby.
7. Make “Permaculture’ a required subject in school.
8. Secure our borders.
9. Allow guest workers, but make the employer responsible for health care costs and payment to return them to their home country upon termination.
10. Re-enact the Slacker Land Laws in cities allowing people to grow food in vacant lots.
11. Run a major propaganda campaign making self sufficiency and conservation the patriotic thing to do.

On the other hand, I may just use my powers to throw myself a very nice party until the lights go out.

Cliff (Start a revolution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Steps to take

Postby evilgenius » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 04:31:55

I forgot a few things.

Outlaw the sale of clothes dryers.

Both tax the rich at 30% and institute a 2% national sales tax.

Form a collective market based social security system that working people can choose to join in addition to the existing system. For every dollar invested there in renewable energy or conservation management companies the government will add a dollar to the same company. Added dollars have to stay there at least a year. The money stays in the persons account until, say the age of 55, then it can be withdrawn. Fraudsters taking advantage of this by way of false companies get life in prison. All buy and sell charges will be shared in such an account between all those making the same daily transaction, thus preventing the death by fees scenario.

Hydrogen power will be gotten via electrolysis, preventing a future oxygen imbalance when mass fuel cell use robs the atmophere of more oxygen than was made available when the hydrogen was initially formed.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: Steps to take

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 11:52:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', ' ')The US can probably support the current population on our own, we just need to reduce our over consumption and stabilize our population.


Not according to the leading pherologists. The US carrying capacity is about 100 to 150 million on a sustainable basis, even with a lifestyle lower than we enjoy today.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Steps to take

Postby Ludi » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 16:11:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
Not according to the leading pherologists. The US carrying capacity is about 100 to 150 million on a sustainable basis, even with a lifestyle lower than we enjoy today.



I'm not convinced. We don't know the carrying capacity of the US for people living a different way, as only two models have been tried on any significant scale (hunting& gathering, and agriculture). We have not tried horticultural societies on a large scale.


If you can give me a reference on these leading pherologists, I'd appreciate it. Because other people have made a strong case for it being possible to support the current population living a different way, sustainably, and on less land than we currently take for our human purposes.


Reference: "Permaculture: a designers manual" by Bill Mollison
Ludi
 

Re: Steps to take

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 19:04:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')f you can give me a reference on these leading pherologists, I'd appreciate it.


I have posted this information perhaps 100 times on this site.

Google pherology.

Google carrying capacity.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Postby Ludi » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 19:19:09

I have, Monte.


There are approx 460+ million acres of arable land in the United States, this means - if we use the typical definition of the word "arable" - land fit for cultivation, as by plowing -"land you can grow food on." An acre is plenty of land on which to grow the food for one person, even under dry farming conditions (it is approx 10 times the amount of land needed if irrigation water is available). Our current population in the US is something like 300 million last I checked. Therefore, we currently have more land than needed to feed the current population if we lived and grew our food a different way.


I guess I must be missing some piece of information you posted somewhere. Sorry to annoy you.


My reference for some figures: http://dieoff.org/page40.htm


I just have to say, I get tired of people saying "we have exceeded carrying capacity" when we don't know the carrying capacity. We KNOW we have exceeded the carrying capacity for living this way. We can estimate the carrying capacity based on other ways. This might not seem like an important distinction to you, but it is to me, so I'll probably keep beefing about it nearly every time someone claims "billions must die because we have exceeded the carrying capacity."


Just my own personal point of view.
Ludi
 

Re: Steps to take

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 19:28:58

(sigh) Once more...

Human Carrying Capacity of Earth

WAY TOO MANY FOR US

The Carrying Capacity of the United States

Land, Water and Energy Versus The Ideal U.S. Population

Just a few from a long list.

Note: Read the metrics used to estimate these numbers.

They all involve a massive reduction in the standard of living.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Steps to take

Postby Ludi » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 19:32:59

Ok, Monte. Have it your way. Your "experts" win out over my "experts."


Just ignore what my "experts" have to say and you win the arguement.



As it turns out, I don't have the willpower to argue with you anymore. I don't have the willpower to fight this death cult.



You win, Monte, you win.
Ludi
 

Re: Steps to take

Postby holmes » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 19:37:49

For the love of god they did studies on the carrying capacity of America in the 1960's. If we were to maintian any semblance of freedom and quality of life it is 150 million. Ludi are you brain dead? lack commons sense? Have problems observing? Are u really an indoor urban person? Do you lack an ecological common sense? i have travelled all over this country on foot with backpack. ovbserving all regions of this continent. the carrying capacity has been breached long ago. Montequest is dead on. End of fucking story. this is such old news. Humans need to get out more and observe the productivity capabilities of the land. Is there some kind of delusional thinking going on?
I do not need no stinking "professionals" to tell me a thing about the capabilities of this land. it was made for hunting and gathering. herding beast protiens. If agricultural it needed to stay at 150 million. we are at 350 million now.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Steps to take

Postby holmes » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 19:43:20

OIL has kept this delusional thinking going way too long. Very hard times and reality are coming sadly. It is scary when the "environmentalists" are clueless on just what the carrying capacity is. Oil has made us all delusional.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Steps to take

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 20:05:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') have, Monte.


There are approx 460+ million acres of arable land in the United States, this means - if we use the typical definition of the word "arable" - land fit for cultivation, as by plowing -"land you can grow food on." An acre is plenty of land on which to grow the food for one person, even under dry farming conditions (it is approx 10 times the amount of land needed if irrigation water is available). Our current population in the US is something like 300 million last I checked. Therefore, we currently have more land than needed to feed the current population if we lived and grew our food a different way.


Food doesn't determine carrying capacity, the least abundant necessity does.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') guess I must be missing some piece of information you posted somewhere. Sorry to annoy you.


You don't annoy me, Ludi.

Just tired of reposting the same stuff over and over again.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 20:05:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')As it turns out, I don't have the willpower to argue with you anymore. I don't have the willpower to fight this death cult.
It does seem like a death cult, doesn't it? Personally, I have no idea what the carrying capacity of the US is. Maybe it can support 150 million, but maybe we need an up and running system of livestock powered plowing to support even that. Maybe we need a massive increase in viable heirloom seed storage that does not rely on Monsanto's patented non-viable self-destructing seeds to do it. Maybe we need to turn back the clock to when the 'arable' land was still naturally fertile to do it. Maybe we need to have millions and millions of fewer superfluous souls to do it. Maybe we need to have the knowledge that was common a hundred years ago but is now forgotten to do it.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Steps to take

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 20:09:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ')I just have to say, I get tired of people saying "we have exceeded carrying capacity" when we don't know the carrying capacity. We KNOW we have exceeded the carrying capacity for living this way. We can estimate the carrying capacity based on other ways. This might not seem like an important distinction to you, but it is to me, so I'll probably keep beefing about it nearly every time someone claims "billions must die because we have exceeded the carrying capacity."


Not exactly, but when all the studies show the median at about 5 billion, we know we are in overshoot by billions and counting.

Remember my note?

Read the metrics used. Those numbers are reached using metrics far below how we live now.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Postby eric_b » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 20:12:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') have, Monte.


There are approx 460+ million acres of arable land in the United States, this means - if we use the typical definition of the word "arable" - land fit for cultivation, as by plowing -"land you can grow food on." An acre is plenty of land on which to grow the food for one person, even under dry farming conditions (it is approx 10 times the amount of land needed if irrigation water is available). Our current population in the US is something like 300 million last I checked. Therefore, we currently have more land than needed to feed the current population if we lived and grew our food a different way.



Perhaps, but being the misanthrope that I am I've got to agree with Monte and Holmes. It may be possible to feed the current (& growing) population if we devote every last scrap of arable land to growing food. Already there are very few desirable places in the US that haven't been heavily molested by people. I say enough is enough, stop now while there's still something left - for us, and for the many other species (aside from our pet domestics) that I feel have a right to survive w/out human meddling.

I don't want to see every last desirable acre plowed and paved in this country, which is where we're heading if we keep breeding like rabbits. Hell, die off is where we're heading if we can't check our numbers. Probably already too late to avoid that anyway.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

Re: Steps to take

Postby MonteQuest » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 20:13:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'O')k, Monte. Have it your way. Your "experts" win out over my "experts."


Just ignore what my "experts" have to say and you win the arguement.


I don't ignore anything. Look at the metrics used in these studies. They include a massive change way in the way we grow food, consume, etc. like you suggest.

This isn't about how many people you can feed, but what is sustainable.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Steps to take

Postby holmes » Fri 20 Jul 2007, 20:26:08

Ludi does not annoy me at all either. It just is so tiring like you said. rehashing what common sense and observation can easily answer. Its just monotonous. it is just that people do not understand how far we have grown over board. it is really all due to the oil. It has brainwashed us into thinking things are so abundant and easy. I mean the carrying capacity now might even be so low as 20 million. I mean we have paved and flushed out to sea most of our top soil and the minerals in it. so many places if food was grown the food will be so depleted of nutrients people will have filled bellies but will be starving.
yes PMS the truly important life sustaining things have been nearly destroyed.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron