I had a thread on this a long time ago:
John Kanzius Saltwater Radio Wave Energy Source?Apparently, Kanzius had discovered a whole new phenomenon of water. A Penn State research scientist and his assistants visited Kanzius' radio wave set-up and confirmed it as "extremely interesting". I wrote to the researcher, Professor Rustum Roy, the head of the Materials Science Lab at PSU, asking about energy inputs/outputs (which I considered to be the burning question, as it were). He wrote back saying that his team did not have the data to determine that.
I found this very frustrating because, at the time, news had been pouring forth about this discovery in frequent articles -- and then it suddenly ceased! A whole lot of people all around the world were fascinated by this new discovery - that water can be split into hydrogen and oxygen by adding some salt and subjecting it to the right kind of radio waves.
This is not electrolysis at all. Was it more efficient than electrolysis? We didn't know. I wanted to find out. But, strangely, the story simply stopped delivering. One would think that it would be a simple matter to measure the energy inputs. Hmph! I wasn't satisfied with Rustum Roy's reply.
He DID confirm that the phenomenon was not a plasma, as some had suggested. It was indeed a flame.
If you're tempted to read the thread, don't bother. This is how it mostly went:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', ' ')In this thread, I have posted over and over again, that Kanzius's invention cannot possibly be an energy source. Yet the thread is continually attacked for being a claim that it IS an energy source.
Wouldn't you like it if it were a claim to be an energy source! Then you would be able show everyone how smart and energy literate you are! But sorry! Kanzius invention can't possibly be an energy source. It IS, however, an interesting phenomenon that no one seems to have hit on before. It's been vetted by the founder of the Materials Sciences Lab at Penn State University, Rustum Roy. It may be more efficient than electrolysis.
So, now, in keeping with this thread's history, you come back and say, "But it can't possibly be an energy source fool!"
And then I come back and say, "Kanzius invention cannot possibly be an energy source but it is interesting because it apparently is an entirely new phenomenon...".
And then you say, "Get this trash off of PO.com! I'm fed up with these energy hoaxes!".
And then I say, "I'm not saying it's an energy source. I'm saying it's quite curious..."
And then you come back and scream, "Godammit. It's not an energy source!!".
...and on and on.
No one ever explained to me why I shouldn't be interested in an apparently never-before-seen property of the physical matter we call H2O and which carries implications for hydrogen production.