Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MOCKBA » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 00:24:22

Interesting two announcement in one day... For one Gazprom is trying to muscle ExxonMobil out of Sakhalin-1 and for another Russia is 45 million tons a year short to fill that pipeline to Asia that is going ahead of the schedule and should come fully online in 2010.

Sakhalin-1 is very simple. Exxon has 30% share of which they have a commitment to supply half to Russia and plan on selling other half to China, but that would undermine Gazprom monopoly. So Gazprom is urging to sell the other half to Russia under excuse that Far East would be short on gas while in reality they would want to liquify it on a shiny new Sakhalin-2 plant they got from BP and then export it under Gazprom label keeping monopoly status. Big wildcard is RosNeft which is Gazprom subsidiary but apparently would love to trade from own account. My guess the gas would be liquified and then sold to China or Japan as Gazprom gas.

The second article got me interested even more... Here is a short official translation to English. The story in Russian is a lot more interesting. What got me interested is a quote from Vice Minister of Natural Resources Department that "Those oil fields do not exist". Note, he didn't say that they are not ready, etc... he said that they do not exist... And then they went into figuring out what went wrong and how come Russians are building 80 million tons a year pipeline to the Pacific for which 45 million tons of oil do not exist.

Turns out the reason is very simple... nobody bothered to look for new oil (kinda what I expected). Well, to be precise SurgutNeftegaz (the one in bed with Putin no less) did and they are the only one who invested any money into looking for oil (and their oil would more likely go to Europe then to Asia because they are in Tumen that supplies Europe and production should start collapsing there sooner then later).

So what did the only company to look for new oil did? Out of 10 billion rubles in profits in the first 2 quartes they commited 8 billion for exploration for the year and bitched that they simply have no money, regardless of high oil prices because new duties eat it all(BTW, SurgutNeftegas is the only company that could afford bitching in Kremlin)... So what did the head of the government sugested to do to come up with missing half to fill the pipeline? More taxes to fund exploration from government coffers sometimes later. Ask me, I doubt all that was ear-marked to Japan and everything else that would be left and ear-marked to China would happen. As it was, they ear-marked the full capacity to each country (i.e. twice the capacity), but now it looks like there is just a half.

Anyhow, interesting number... with oil at $67, Russian oil companies pay to the government $27 in duties and transit and $37 that left should cover their costs, make some money and yeah look for new oil. Would you spend any money on useless task of looking for oil when Soviets did it for you for free and when it run out... well, there was always another Yukos to go after?

The article pretty much confirmed that Russians didn't do any meaningful exploration outside of already producing and explored fields - that would be too expensive and very useless because time-horizon in Russia is less then 10 years.
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MOCKBA » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 01:23:10

What a day... Yet another article in Russian this time a front page. In this one they quote the VP of LukOil saying that "oil production in Russia could fall in half and to keep it at current level it is neccessary to produce as many new fields as was produced in the last 100 years" and then he goes into saying that $300 billion is needed in the next 8-10 years... $300 billion BTW is how much GazProm, RusNeft, Russian Railways and electricity generator owe foreign investors as of rightnow and earlier it was said that when foreign investors stop flooding Russia with money probably it would look very much alike 1997 in Asia - so were the words of the head of Russian Central Bank a month ago.

LukOil breakdown 2002-2006 46% of profits were paid in taxes... so far this year taxes took 60%...

In general they say that growth rates in Russian oil sector would be half the rate of the growth of the economy overall and oil sector is the major sector and once again stress out that all oil companies are buying assets and go for capitalization instead of investing in core business.
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby cube » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 03:10:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MOCKBA', '.').. And then they went into figuring out what went wrong and how come Russians are building 80 million tons a year pipeline to the Pacific for which 45 million tons of oil do not exist.
....
Houston, we have a problem. :wink:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 05:06:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MOCKBA', 'W')hat a day... Yet another article in Russian this time a front page. In this one they quote the VP of LukOil saying that "oil production in Russia could fall in half and to keep it at current level it is neccessary to produce as many new fields as was produced in the last 100 years" and then he goes into saying that $300 billion is needed in the next 8-10 years... $300 billion BTW is how much GazProm, RusNeft, Russian Railways and electricity generator owe foreign investors as of rightnow and earlier it was said that when foreign investors stop flooding Russia with money probably it would look very much alike 1997 in Asia - so were the words of the head of Russian Central Bank a month ago.

LukOil breakdown 2002-2006 46% of profits were paid in taxes... so far this year taxes took 60%...

In general they say that growth rates in Russian oil sector would be half the rate of the growth of the economy overall and oil sector is the major sector and once again stress out that all oil companies are buying assets and go for capitalization instead of investing in core business.


MOCKBA, thanks for the articles. By the way, the ЛУКОuЛа AGM is in less than 10-days from now. Леонид Федун is not on the ballet for BOD this year. I was also very surprised by that? I do not think it is an accident that they use their cash flow 'from' Russia to make the bulk of their investments 'overseas'. They can see the writing on the wall.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MOCKBA » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 09:46:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')I do not think it is an accident that they use their cash flow 'from' Russia to make the bulk of their investments 'overseas'. They can see the writing on the wall.


I don't think LukOil is particulary smart, could read "writings on the wall" or PO aware... It is the same as with US banks and subprime lending, or the same as flooding the world with liquidity... It is capitalism in action - if you waste your money on useless tasks like looking for oil and do not do like others do as far as increasing capitalization - sooner rather then later you would be cash poor and would be bought out... If you are a good oilman in Russia, you are most likely to be very bad business man and the other way around...

Anyhow, what surprised me the most is that last month Russian equivalent of Ben Bernanke "dropped a bomb" saying that inflation would be 11-12% and the ruble will continue to strengthen and in 2009 (he did put a date on this) ruble would have to devalue. Then he went into comparing Russian banking system to that of Asia right before Asian crisis... pointed out huge foreign debt state companies accumulated and would have problems servicing and went all the way to saying that foreign capital inflows is the only thing that could delay the crisis. All 5 items are very interesting as they are, but when they came together... Ain't it look like "the party is over"?

Another interesting piece of information that came out of all this... In Russia the government takes excess dollars oil industry gets when oil prices are above certain number ($45 for 2006) and put them into Stabilization Fund. The Fund is what paid Russian debt and should be about couple hundred billion dollars by now. The reason why they pay out county debt from the Fund is that they don't have any better use for that money - they cannot buy US government debt not because they don't want to, they just can't because of the law. The only things that they are allowed to do is to either buy gold (since 2005-06 I believe) or hold currency. That means that for one Russia was buying gold at way over $500 and kept the rest of the money just sitting there as numbers in a computer. The problem is that the number was denominated in USD or EUR for most part, and RUB was appreciating against both and experienced 10% inflation. As a result of all that, one ruble put into fund say 3-5 years ago, worth about half today. So Chinese buying US debt did a lot better.

The reason why they did with the Fund what they did is very interesting - the alternative would be a hyper-inflation. It would be interesting to see how it would all unwind... I think it would be more like Japan then Asia in 1998... Wasn't Tokyo the most expensive city to live in at some point in time? Moscow just became the most expensive city.

Oh, I forgot to mention that the government said (on the record) that it will not allow to default the state companies that accumulated too much debt and will be unable to service it once foreign investors would pull out or stop flooding Russia with cash. They have couple hundred billions to do that. 4 biggest state companies owe more then three hundred billion... So yeah, a trillion dollars does not buy much these days.
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 10:56:09

Ya, a trillion dollar trust fund and no roads outside of the Moscow-St.Pete corridor. I had to laugh at a list of Russia's largest construction projects slated for state aid, and one of them was a 15-20 km road linking a bedroom community outside of Moscow to the city. Not that Moscow doesn't need better roads. I will be there tomorrow and hope it won't take more than 'a few hours' to get from Sheremetyevo II to Kuznetsky Moct? As you say, no one has a time horizon longer than 10-years.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby seahorse2 » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 11:12:36

Mockba,

Did the article saying Russian production could fall in half give any type of time frame?

Also, Mockba, Mr. Bill, others, what will be the ramnifications of being short 45 m tons a year on the Asian pipeline? If this is supposed to be shipping oil by 2010, but can't, how will that affect world oil prices, the economies etc?
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 11:27:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', 'M')ockba,

Did the article saying Russian production could fall in half give any type of time frame?

Also, Mockba, Mr. Bill, others, what will be the ramnifications of being short 45 m tons a year on the Asian pipeline? If this is supposed to be shipping oil by 2010, but can't, how will that affect world oil prices, the economies etc?


My gut feeling is that it means twice as much oil has been promised as can be realistically delivered, so those imports to Asia will have to come from the ME instead, but also it negatively affects the payback period and profitability of the pipeline as well. Poor project planning basically, but symptomatic of all things where political control of projects trumps sound business decisions.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby MOCKBA » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 13:37:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', '
')Did the article saying Russian production could fall in half give any type of time frame?

Unfortunately not (I was looking for that too), but generally VP of Lukoil was talking in 8-10 years timeframe context, though he didn't say that it would fall in half within those 8-10 years. It is still very interesting to see head of Lukoil talking about drastic declines due to very little investment in exploration. May be Mr. Bill would hear more while in Moscow. I wouldn't be surprised if Lukoil would join the club of operators in decline.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', 'w')hat will be the ramnifications of being short 45 m tons a year on the Asian pipeline?

45 m tons a year is about 1 million barrels a day that Asia will not get. 45 m tons is also about 10% on top of current peak Russian production i.e. by 2010 Russia expected to grow production by another 10% on this alone and mostly from Siberia (there are other pipelines to Europe being upgraded from Pechora basin).

In his "4 more years" speach Putin promised to double GDP and those pipeline projects started once he got those "4 more years"... For my taste it was just bullshit statement, but they started building... after orchestrating a bidding war between Japan and China... the result of the bidding war was that about 3 million barrels a day were ear-marked, the pipeline is for about 2, now it turns out there is enough oil for only 1.

My understanding is that Japan financed the pipeline, so at the end it is Russian government liability (since they stated they would be bailing out state corporations) that they were supposed to finance from oil shipments of which they would have only half. Clearly there might be problems repaying the debt with an interest.

This got me thinking that TransNeft is not alone in "effective management"... Gazprom - world bigest NG producer is barely afloat and would have hard time making interest payments especially with stronger ruble... Earlier this year Unified Energy Systems was voted to be disolved and assets sold off and as a result Russia is set to double in cost of electricity... Oil duties went up about 25% this year... Inflation will continue to be in double digits and ruble would continue to strenghen, thus costs would soar, at the same time receipts would be flat... Yeild curve would steepen and sooner then later the investors should realize that emerging markets deserve higher risk premiums... And then there is upcoming election when those who was put in jail or in London would love to get back what was taken from them... Perfect storm if you wish...

If I could I would swap Russian corporate debt of state controlled behemots for US Government debt, but I cannot. So the next best thing for me as a retail investor is to write spreads on freshly listed RSX ETF, but it is hard to go against both the bulls and the doomers.
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby Bas » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 14:05:11

I wonder how much oil remains to be found in Russia; since the fall of the soviet union there seems to have been hardly any exploration using western techniques. Also considering the huge finds in Kazachstan it makes me wonder if there aren't still some significant finds to be made in that huge country, much more so than any other (big) country in the world. I'm not counting on it though, nevertheless it would be interesting to do some exploration on the state of oil exploration in Russia.
Bas
 

Re: Russia is short 45 million tons a year

Unread postby lateStarter » Wed 20 Jun 2007, 17:56:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bas', 'I') wonder how much oil remains to be found in Russia; since the fall of the soviet union there seems to have been hardly any exploration using western techniques. Also considering the huge finds in Kazachstan it makes me wonder if there aren't still some significant finds to be made in that huge country, much more so than any other (big) country in the world. I'm not counting on it though, nevertheless it would be interesting to do some exploration on the state of oil exploration in Russia.


I'm pretty sure China is thinking the same thing. Plus, they probably have more geologists than the entire population of Russia! If I was Russia, I'd be keeping a close eye on the back door.
We have been brought into the present condition in which we are unable neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them. - Livy
User avatar
lateStarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 38 km west of Warsaw, Poland
Top


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron