Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Article: "Eschatological Taxonomy" by Jamais Cascio's

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

What is the greatest existential risk you expect before 2100?

0 - Regional Catastrophe
5
No votes
1 - Human Die-Back
1
No votes
2 - Civilization Extinction
4
No votes
3a - Human Extinction-Engineered
1
No votes
3b - Human Extinction-Natural
0
0%
4 - Biosphere Extinction
0
0%
5 - Planetary Extinction
0
0%
X - Planetary Elimination
0
0%
 
Total votes : 11

Article: "Eschatological Taxonomy" by Jamais Cascio's

Unread postby johnmarkos » Mon 18 Jun 2007, 02:24:09

I thought peak oil folks would enjoy this taxonomy of existential risks.
CLASS EFFECT
0 Regional Catastrophe (examples: moderate-case global warming, minor asteroid impact, local thermonuclear war)
Global civilization not eliminated, but regional civilizations effectively destroyed; millions to hundreds of millions dead, but large parts of humankind retain current social and technological conditions. Chance of humankind recovery: excellent. Species local to the catastrophe likely die off, and post-catastrophe effects (refugees, fallout, etc.) may kill more. Chance of biosphere recovery: excellent.
1 Human Die-Back (examples: extreme-case global warming, moderate asteroid impact, global thermonuclear war)
Global civilization set back to pre- or low-industrial conditions; several billion or more dead, but human species as a whole survives, in pockets of varying technological and social conditions. Chance of humankind recovery: moderate. Most non-human species on brink of extinction die off, but most other plant and animal species remain and, eventually, flourish. Chance of biosphere recovery: excellent.
2 Civilization Extinction (examples: worst-case global warming, significant asteroid impact, early-era molecular nanotech warfare)
Global civilization destroyed; millions (at most) remain alive, in isolated locations, with ongoing death rate likely exceeding birth rate. Chance of humankind recovery: slim. Many non-human species die off, but some remain and, over time, begin to expand and diverge. Chance of biosphere recovery: good.
3a Human Extinction-Engineered (examples: targeted nano-plague, engineered sterility absent radical life extension)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Conditions triggering this are human-specific, so other species are, for the most part, unaffected. Chance of humankind recovery: nil. Chance of biosphere recovery: excellent.
3b Human Extinction-Natural (examples: major asteroid impact, methane clathrates melt)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Conditions triggering this are general and global, so other species are greatly affected, as well. Chance of humankind recovery: nil. Chance of biosphere recovery: moderate.
4 Biosphere Extinction (examples: massive asteroid impact, "iceball Earth" reemergence, late-era molecular nanotech warfare)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Biosphere massively disrupted, with the wholesale elimination of many niches. Chance of humankind recovery: nil. Chance of biosphere recovery: slim. Chance of eventual re-emergence of organic life: good.
5 Planetary Extinction (examples: dwarf-planet-scale asteroid impact, nearby gamma-ray burst)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Biosphere effectively destroyed; all species extinct. Geophysical disruption sufficient to prevent or greatly hinder re-emergence of organic life.
X Planetary Elimination (example: post-Singularity beings disassemble planet to make computronium)
Global civilization destroyed; all humans dead. Ecosystem destroyed; all species extinct. Planet itself destroyed.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Tue 26 Jan 2010, 11:51:06, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Added content from article.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Re: Jamais Cascio's "Eschatological Taxonomy"

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 18 Jun 2007, 18:57:16

Guess I am not the only optimist ;)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA

Re: Jamais Cascio's "Eschatological Taxonomy"

Unread postby Bas » Mon 18 Jun 2007, 20:39:02

We peak oilers aren't that bad if you look at it from "Eschatological Taxonomy" :)
Bas
 

Re: Jamais Cascio's "Eschatological Taxonomy"

Unread postby johnmarkos » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 04:48:27

Wow, nobody voted higher than 2! That's pretty optimistic.

So I guess peakers mostly agree with Bruce Sterling on PO's place in the eschatological taxonomy.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce Sterling', 'p')eak oil would barely register as a "class zero."


In the big picture, there just isn't all that much difference between doomers and cornucopians, it seems.
To do serious futurism you need to think historically. The future is a kind of history that hasn't happened yet. - Bruce Sterling
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California


Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest