Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Greg » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 15:53:31

It appears to me that many people who believe that all societal power must return to self-sufficient local communities with little or no contact to the outside world ignore any information about alternative energy sources and say that technological civilization is doomed simply because they want technological civilization to fail, not because they know it will. A hatred of technology itself is not the root of their obsession. It is the subconcious belief that only through the collapse of technology will their twin enemies of government and corporations die out. Then, the only thing left will be various tight-knit cliques of people, of course each clique filled with others only like them, in their "lifeboats." They do not ever want to see any people not like themselves, which is why they so hate immigrants and also so love guns, in order to shoot away native-born Americans who do not happen to be local. Also, they loathe the idea of anyone they have not met in person, even the ones that they can see on TV, the Internet, etc., are like them, having any impact on their lives. So they want the government and corporations brought down. They just direct their lives around the proposition that "technofixes will never work," even though they prboably will. Just my thought.
User avatar
Greg
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue 24 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby pedalling_faster » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 16:50:06

i don' know. one of the premier re-localizers, Jason Bradford in Willits, i think was just looking for a safe place to raise his kids, through turbulent times.

admittedly, there is some "circling of the wagons" that occurs, a mis-trust of strangers.

i tried to look at a land-locked parcel near the eel river. i talked with the guys at the County about how to get in there, real friendly helpful guy. you need people to open gates along roads, etc. had to wonder if showing up with a cooler full of ice cream would help. there's some medicinal plant production that occurs there and it affects how newcomers are treated.

But - i don't notice much, if any, racism in the California localizing-ish areas.
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby bshirt » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 17:17:25

Greg;

Of your original post, the hatred of government and corporations is the only part that rings true. In other words, unaccountable bureaucracy is the highest of evils.

The accusations of hating technology is pure horsesh*t. As an electronic technician my whole adult life I can't imagine a more grossly untrue statement. My bother (Phd EE) and most of the people I know are hard science majors.

I assume the rest of the garbage you claim is only a copy of some "political correctness" magazine article you found somewhere.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby keehah » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 17:25:55

So those not in denial are haters? Is that the message I am supposed to get from your hate?

Don't call me a hater just becvause I am aware that past applications of new technologies generally have unintended consequences. I am trained in, work in, and study the energy issues regarding many techno-fixes and they to not stand up.

Most are a form of denial and a tool for salesmen.
As for the other stuff: deal with your issues, you need a better map to understand what is happening.

Hope for the best, prepare for the worst, is better than hope for the consensus trance to become reality, call anyone building lifeboats treasonous haters!
Last edited by keehah on Wed 13 Jun 2007, 18:13:04, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
keehah
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 220
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The Maple State

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby steam_cannon » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 17:51:22

Listen 18, your post is both dumb and insulting; and I'll tell you why.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Greg', 'p')eople who believe that all societal power must return to self-sufficient local communities with little or no contact to the outside world
This is the most reasonable thing you said and it's certainly possible many people do believe that and why not, I've seen it enough times in history.

When New Orleans happened, society there broke down into small groups. When the soviet union collapsed, they broke down into small self sufficient economies. Same deal after Cuba's oil imports collapse, they broke down large farms and cities into small self sufficient farm towns to match their reduced energy picture. Similar observations can be made of the Roman collapse as well. This is the path collapsing civilizations take and it's pretty rude of you to accuse people of simply desiring isolation and doom.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Greg', 's')ubconcious belief
This isn't about subconcious belief, what we talk about here are big glaring problems staring us in the face. This map for example:

Image
Thanks to Climate Change, by 2050 America's Breadbasket Will Be in Canada - 2006

When researchers look over the numbers on climate change and see this, what do you think it means? Most of the blue on this map is unfarmable lake and mountain! Do you think these guys desired to tell everyone many children will starve in the future? Do you think all the non-existent fusion powered weenie roasters in the world can bring us back from this? The end of ocean CO2 absorption, melting tundra methane, the massive acceleration of ice cap melting. These tipping points are already behind us buddy and at some point you are going to have to accept the future has problems. Energy, Climate, Population... Big problems.

Bye the way, what about the other researchers who found this?
Global warming 'is three times faster than worst predictions' - 2007
Do you think these people just want to predict doom? Maybe the thought of their families suffering lights their cigar? No.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Greg', 'w')hich is why they so hate immigrants and also so love guns, in order to shoot away native-born Americans
Just my thought.
You sir are a nutball troll. The people on this forum have families. What are you saying here, you are calling the people here gun loving killers.

If you had a specific question about societies that have collapsed in history or the impact of declining EROEI on industry and economies, then I'm sure people would be more then happy to answer your post. You could have asked "What motivates relocalizers" and asked about historical precedents, psychological motivations... But when you troll away with insulting garbage, that makes you a troll. In the future, try posing your "observations" as questions and see what people think.

This troll thread should be deleted or moved to the hall of flames. :roll:
Last edited by steam_cannon on Wed 13 Jun 2007, 18:02:52, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby steam_cannon » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 17:55:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('keehah', 'S')o those not in denial are haters?
Yeah, I thought that's pretty ridiculous too.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bshirt', 'a')nd most of the people I know are hard science majors.
Same for my family...
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby roccman » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 18:01:37

A distain for technology..??

what hogwash!!

Newsflash - "technology" has only ever been made available throughout history because energy drove its development.

The availability of energy is a precursor to techno fixes.

No energy=no techno fixes.

You have quite a bit of reading to do.

Now then - back to my bunker and garden away from fools like yourself.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby steam_cannon » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 18:06:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('roccman', 'N')ow then - back to my bunker and garden away from fools like yourself.
You're great roccman! :lol:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Pops » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 18:07:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Greg', 'J')ust my thought.


Thanks for sharing those thoughts Greg, here are mine:

It seems funny to me how many folks construe Love-of-buying-useless-crap-from-a-world-away-cuz-it-is-on-sale-or -on TV-or-the-neighbors-have-one-or-just-because-they-have- a-few-bucks-left-in-the-account:
as civilization...

and the opposite as Ludditism.

Oh well; buy away.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Heineken » Wed 13 Jun 2007, 21:24:52

Greg, goose me when those "technofixes" of yours start working. In the meantime, I cast my lot with the relocalizers.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Windmills » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:17:27

Greg,

I think you're confusing relocalizing with intentional communities, the latter of which may very well have some of the traits you describe. Some of them are set up for some pretty fruity reasons. But you really need to read more and gain a better understanding of the important differences.

Relocalization is going to be a forced adaptation to the loss of energy in the economy. It's not about psychology or other bizarre issues and politics, its about physics. High energy systems that we now have are going to break down into smaller ones as energy depletes. It won't be a matter of choice or culture. The current systems are simply going to be unsustainable. Relocalizing is going to be inevitable. The main thrust of people wanting to relocalize now is to do it while we still have the time and resources to accomplish the task with as little suffering as possible. It's going to happen one way or another. The soon, the better.
Putting it off will only make the transition more calamitous.

Unfortunately, it seems that is the way it might happen. Too many people seem bent on living high off the energy hog for as long as possible rather than using the last of our one-time hydrocarbon gift to secure a better future. It seems a number of people are just crossing their fingers, hoping to live out their life and sneak on into the next one before things get bad without regard for their children.
Windmills
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Greg » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:36:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Windmills', 'G')reg,

I think you're confusing relocalizing with intentional communities, the latter of which may very well have some of the traits you describe. Some of them are set up for some pretty fruity reasons. But you really need to read more and gain a better understanding of the important differences.


In my subject heading, I said "Some Relocalizers." I consider "intentional communities" to be a subset of the relocalization movement.
User avatar
Greg
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue 24 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Greg » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 11:46:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'G')reg, goose me when those "technofixes" of yours start working. In the meantime, I cast my lot with the relocalizers.


Here's a "goose" posted on this site.

http://peakoil.com/fortopic22900.html
User avatar
Greg
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue 24 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby jeezlouise » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 12:24:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Greg', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'G')reg, goose me when those "technofixes" of yours start working. In the meantime, I cast my lot with the relocalizers.


Here's a "goose" posted on this site.

http://peakoil.com/fortopic22900.html


I believe Heineken asked for a goose when technology visibly starts to save our asses in the present tense. The link you provided has some good ideas, but for now, that's all they are. Proposals. The chasm between "can" and "will" remains as wide as ever.
User avatar
jeezlouise
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun 05 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby gg3 » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 12:47:56

I call BS on this too, and about the smears of intentional communities.

I'm a telephone systems engineer; I work sometimes 16-hour days designing and building technology until it feels like I have it coming out my ears. In my spare time I tinker with various forms of conservation technology.

And I'm one of the ones around here who is vigorously in favor of nuclear fission. If I could get PG&E to build a reactor next to where my & mine intend to set up community, I'd do it in a flat second (though in all fairness this is a controversial position in my community). I also believe in major space exploration including sending humans to colonize other planets in other star systems: not to relieve Earth's overpopulation (which is not possible that way), but to establish new civilzations that will continue after the Sun goes nova and Earth gets vaporized.

In terms of cultural orientation about all this, I call myself an eco-industrial. And I've also got a spiritual streak, going back to single-digit age.

As for racism, I live in Oakland California which is majority black last time I checked, and I've done production work on albums by rap & hiphop artists whose names even you have probably heard (as well as punk rock and progressive and various other genres, but anyway...).

As for pulling up the proverbial drawbridge, my intentional community group was specifically founded to carry out the mission of establishing an education and skills-sharing network across the region in which we intend to settle. When we talk about relocalization we are talking about a couple of counties, not just our little plot of land and all our pals.

As for the decline & fall, as the woman in the Palmolive dish detergent commercial once said, "You're soaking in it." Just to take one example: Bush's rollback of Habeas Corpus undoes something like 400 years of Anglo-Saxon legal precedent. The anti-science religious extremists' brigade is seeking nothing less than a return to the 14th century, perhaps with a detour for Armageddon and the Second Coming (I should start referring to that as "the Second-Guessing," meaning these nutters are trying to second-guess God).

What I can do without is the "financialization of the economy" where people don't produce real things any more, they sell each other pieces of paper. And I can do without the reckless reproduction and idiotic consumerism that are trashing the planet, though frankly I wouldn't give a flying fig what other consenting adults do except that the multiplying & consuming are killing the planet, which makes me & mine & you & yours all non-consenting parties to the externalities of others' transactions.

And I can do without the creeping Franco-style fascism that's been taking over our government, and the bigotries and hatreds and violence it's unleashed. And I can do without the incompetence in the White House that's stretched our military almost to the breaking point and in general made a shitty mess of almost everything it's touched (GWB = "The King Midas of Poo," everything he touches turns not into gold but into stinking doodoo).

If it were up to me I'd be some kind of contemplative, designing technologies that interest me because they make peoples' lives better, and writing lengthy essays & fiction about abstract topics that inspire me and appeal to a few other kindred spirits, and living in the woods for the mere fact that to me the forest is the real house of God, and never having to worry about any of this decline & fall stuff.

But rather than sinking into some kind of terminal depression over all this decline & fall stuff, I've chosen to roll up my sleeves and take it as an engineering challenge.

I guess that makes me weird, huh?
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby basil_hayden » Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:14:04

Hey Greg-

Glad you climbed out from under that rock.

What's so hard about understanding that the bulk of our petroleum use is for transportation which results in the rich getting richer, and that if stuff was local the transportation (as well as environmental impact) would be greatly decreased?

This has nothing to do with techno-hate, or living in an intentional community, which I have no intention of doing.

It's not techno-hate, dude, it's corporate-hate.
Recycle those dollars locally instead of globally.
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby steam_cannon » Fri 15 Jun 2007, 13:17:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'I') call BS on this too, and about the smears of intentional communities.
thanks gg3. I have already built an intentional community (a cohousing project in Arcata, Ca.) because it is a first step in regaining local economy. We share land and responsibilities.
I checked out "Arcata, Ca" on google maps, wow what a view! Ocean, nice hills and forests, looks beautiful! And the area looks alright on long term climate change too, good deal! :)
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 17 Jun 2007, 20:31:09

Can't speak for other relocalizers, but I love technology (see me using this computer!) and I think space stuff is keen!


My screen-name does not refer to "luddite." :)
Ludi
 

Re: This Is What I Think Motivates Some Relocalizers

Unread postby TheTurtle » Mon 18 Jun 2007, 08:04:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'M')y screen-name does not refer to "luddite." :)


Because then it would be spelled "Luddi". :P
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron