Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Discovery Channel Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby NEOPO » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 02:21:57

I saw the commercial which made me go "pffft" and "heh heh" but otherwise I missed it and was hoping that some cornucopian or peaker with too much time on their hands would come post a thread and shine light on the finer points saving us all the trouble :o
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby perdition79 » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 05:29:44

Only at Peakoil.com would the phrase "future car" be an oxymoron. :lol:
http://www.thepeoplescube.com/

"We are building a religion; we are building it bigger. We are widening the corridors and adding more lanes."
Cake - Comfort Eagle
User avatar
perdition79
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Babylon

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby eXpat » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 08:06:53

Does it flight? I'm old enough to remember that i was promised by 2K flighing cars and robots that will relieve us of all human chores. I'll settle for a flighing car.
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 08:32:33

When I was a kid we had (among thousands of others!) a book with planes with counterrotating props on the nose that would take off and land streight up, and a sort of flying platform with a guy dressed like Dilbert, hell no, no helmet, casually standing there holding the controls, and all sorts of other idiotic stuff.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby peaker_2005 » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 08:51:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('perdition79', 'O')nly at Peakoil.com would the phrase "future car" be an oxymoron. :lol:


You win the thread.

:lol:
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." - Douglas Adams
User avatar
peaker_2005
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby Pablo2079 » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 11:12:51

I watched part of it last night. The parts I saw were about Hydrogen in Norway and solar cars.

The hydrogen part was interesting, yet fictional. They were discussing possible future Hydrogen filling stations that produced the gas at the location and also used solar to do it. The unit generating the hydrogen is supposedly about the size of an American Refrigerator. I thought it interesting that they pointed out "American".

After they got into the solar cars, I had to turn it off. I can only watch so much.

It was interesting trying to watch the show as if I didn't know anything about the subject at all. "Technology will save us all" was the feeling I got from the 20 or so minutes I invested.
User avatar
Pablo2079
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed 08 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Cascadia

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby Peak_Modernity » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 13:44:02

I saw the first part with ethanol and turned it off.

I still remember when they had the show "Beyond 2000" showing all the great stuff we were going to have. They conveniently left out how far beyond 2000 it would be.
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby Aaron » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 13:51:19

I love that show!

It's all about the stuff I was promised as a young man... flyin cars & RingWorlds & cute ET's & such.

Sweet...

I am Hydrocarbon Man & I will have my freakin flyin car...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby eXpat » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 14:43:46

Flying car ready for take-off!!!!link, 8 years ago... :(
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby PrairieMule » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 19:03:35

In the future our cars will run on oats and sugar cubes
Image

Tips Appreciated.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby MD » Thu 22 Feb 2007, 19:46:05

I have three channels programmed into my favorites:

The History Channel -- Because I want to know where we've been.

National Geographic -- Because I want to know where we are.

The Science Channel -- Because I want to know where we're going.


I liked the electric solar powered ultralight car that was shown in that program.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: anyone watching this futurecar b.s. on discovery channel

Postby Chuckmak » Fri 23 Feb 2007, 02:14:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Modernity', 'I') still remember when they had the show "Beyond 2000" showing all the great stuff we were going to have. They conveniently left out how far beyond 2000 it would be.


hahahahahah
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City

THE Discovery Channel Thread (merged)

Postby advancedatheist » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 00:58:37

I've started to watch the Discovery Channel's series "Building the Future." Just 15-20 minutes into the first episode, about finding energy for a desperate industrial civilization, it shows the construction of huge wind mills for generating electricity in the North Sea off of the Netherlands. The blades require diesel trucks to move from the factory to a ship, and the ship of course needs bunker fuel to transport the blades and foundation for installation in a rough sea. The whole process requires a massive subsidy of energy from fossil fuels to work, in other words, indicating that the windmill technology can't bootrstrap and sustain itself as the oil supply continues to decline. But the series just ignorantly passes this effort off as a "solution" to the energy crisis instead of a feel-good exercise.
"There was a time before reason and science when my ancestors believed in all manner of nonsense." Narim on <I>Stargate SG-1</i>.
User avatar
advancedatheist
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Discovery's clueless "Building the Future"

Postby Falconoffury » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 01:36:50

I like the part where they went on about how cheap and safe nuclear fusion-based energy is. They went on to say that we expect it to be 50 years away from commercial use, but didn't elaborate on why. Fusion has been 50 years away since the beginning of the entire project. The truth is, we have no idea how long it will take to harness fusion for our uses.

The unwavering optimism disgusts me. The people interviewed in this show basically said we have huge problems, and we'll solve all of them. Has it ever occurred to them that maybe we won't?
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Discovery's clueless "Building the Future"

Postby Doly » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 10:15:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'H')as it ever occurred to them that maybe we won't?


Yes, but they were not paid to say that on TV.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Discovery's clueless "Building the Future"

Postby gnm » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 10:32:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('advancedatheist', 'T')he whole process requires a massive subsidy of energy from fossil fuels to work, in other words, indicating that the windmill technology can't bootrstrap and sustain itself as the oil supply continues to decline. But the series just ignorantly passes this effort off as a "solution" to the energy crisis instead of a feel-good exercise.


While I agree that the availability of cheap fossil fuel makes programs like this easy, and we could run afoul of "receding horizons" while trying to deploy alternatives, its not actually true that such systems could not produce useable fuel. Electricity can be used to synthesize ammonia which can be used to fuel conventional ice-type engines.

-G
gnm
 

Re: Discovery's clueless "Building the Future"

Postby Windmills » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 10:56:04

Most optimists discussing wind and solar power often fail to mention that decent energy storage is not yet in our grasp. One result is that for every unit of installed wind or solar, you need a larger amount of conventional generating capacity to ensure that you don't have an intermittent system. Wind and solar can't stand on their own. They're more like conservation systems than anything, allowing us to stretch our fossil fuel reserves a little farther. And as with all conservation efforts, they will be undone by Jevons', the fact that we greedily cling to an infinite growth/consumption economic model, and constant population growth.
Windmills
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Discovery's clueless "Building the Future"

Postby advancedatheist » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 10:58:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gnm', ' ')While I agree that the availability of cheap fossil fuel makes programs like this easy, and we could run afoul of "receding horizons" while trying to deploy alternatives, its not actually true that such systems could not produce useable fuel. Electricity can be used to synthesize ammonia which can be used to fuel conventional ice-type engines.


But where do you get the net energy to build, transport and assemble the replacements for existing windmills, which will eventually wear out? The Discovery Channel show basically devoted an hour to perpetual motion machines.
"There was a time before reason and science when my ancestors believed in all manner of nonsense." Narim on <I>Stargate SG-1</i>.
User avatar
advancedatheist
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Discovery's clueless "Building the Future"

Postby gnm » Mon 11 Jun 2007, 11:12:00

Advanced, wind is one of the few alternative energy systems which has a fairly high return on investment. There is no reason even a 19th century economy couldn't build and maintain wind generators. Maybe not 400ft monsters out in the sea, but certainly large land based ones. Now if we can get past the NIMBY crap.

Windmills, I am not generally considered an optimist. I run PV but I don't expect them to save anything. Just a way of keeping the lights on for a lucky few.

Wind should not be lumped together with PV as is far easier to construct and deploy. granted is lacks in consistency and storage capacity but lead acid batteries are a very primitive technology and aren't going away.

For small localized uses wind works great. So does PV but we'll never build enough of them to make much difference...

-G
gnm
 

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron