by Zentric » Wed 30 May 2007, 03:15:28
Yeah, right. And here's another passage from the same "New York Times" article:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut Republican leaders on the House Government Reform Committee, which has been reviewing the flawed leases, recently accused Interior officials of perpetuating a “culture of irresponsibility and lack of accountability” at the agency.
So, in sum, irresponsibility, lack of accountability, cronyism, cover-ups, management blunders, capitulation to oil companies, low morale amongst the auditors, unreliable data gathering on extracted oil... blah blah blah...
so what, and WHO CARES?
Look. As long as I feel assured that my government and the oil companies it cooperates with would never lie to me with respect to their reporting on the sizes of, or the changes in, our oil and gasoline stockpiles, or with how much gasoline or oil we consume from month to month, or how much consumption truly has gone down in response to higher gasoline prices and how this decrease stacks up against the stated lags in gasoline imports and domestic refining capacity, and that the Government's reports of inflation and real GDP are
always rock solid and to be believed, and that the oil companies and refiners, with the Government's assistance, are, and always have been, doing their level best to maintain a sufficient supply of gasoline for domestic use in the near, medium and long-terms[sup]*[/sup] while, of course, always working to assure for themselves a fair profit along the way - then I know what I need to know. And what does it concern me if some poor auditor is having a bad week or, for that matter, if Kerr-McKee could have gotten its hands on millions of barrels of unaccounted-for oil?
Not that it matters, but I'm skeptical. Can you
prove this article actually came from the New York Times?
[sup]*[/sup] Not that there is anything right about that, mind you.
