Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Is Life Getting Better? (Cheeseburgers and Child Mortality)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Is Life Getting Better? (Cheeseburgers and Child Mortality)

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 26 May 2007, 21:42:54

[edited by Tyler_JC] An off topic discusssion about the cost of cheeseburgers and whether or not life was improving in the world started in another thread.

It started with:


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'F')or some strange reason, everyone on this site assumes that if gasoline doubles in the price, the cost of every single good or service will double as well. Well, the cost of gasoline has tripled since 1999 and a cheeseburger at McDonald's is still a buck...


Somebody in the economy is absorbing this loss, no? Higher production costs don't just dissappear down some rathole. If prices stay the same, something else is cut. Usually someone's job.[fade]
Last edited by MonteQuest on Sun 27 May 2007, 11:22:53, edited 1 time in total.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby PolestaR » Sun 27 May 2007, 02:43:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'F')or some strange reason, everyone on this site assumes that if gasoline doubles in the price, the cost of every single good or service will double as well. Well, the cost of gasoline has tripled since 1999 and a cheeseburger at McDonald's is still a buck...


Well actually the price of the cheeseburger (and many other Maccie D burgers) has increased in many places in the world. And according to some stats I just researched the price of the BigMac has increased 29% since 2002 compared to 2007 in the USA. If I wanted to eat a cheeseburger today I would be paying about twice as much as I was back in 99 and about 8 times as much as I was paying in 89, not sure about where you're from but I suggest the price has increased a considerable amount.

Image
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby EnergySpin » Sun 27 May 2007, 08:03:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '
')
Well actually the price of the cheeseburger (and many other Maccie D burgers) has increased in many places in the world. And according to some stats I just researched the price of the BigMac has increased 29% since 2002 compared to 2007 in the USA. If I wanted to eat a cheeseburger today I would be paying about twice as much as I was back in 99 and about 8 times as much as I was paying in 89, not sure about where you're from but I suggest the price has increased a considerable amount.


I do not want to mess with your Big Mac index fantasies, but according to a paper from Princeton the price of the Big Mac in the US during the 1998 fiscal year was 2.43$ , while in 2000 it was 2.51$ (see tables 1 and 2 of http://economics.uchicago.edu/download/bigmac.pdf )

It was 3.06$ in 2005 and I guess it must be 3.22$ today. There is no way you could be eating twice as much in 1999 compared to now, unless you flanked elementary school :roll:
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby PolestaR » Sun 27 May 2007, 11:08:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', 'I') do not want to mess with your Big Mac index fantasies, but according to a paper from Princeton the price of the Big Mac in the US during the 1998 fiscal year was 2.43$ , while in 2000 it was 2.51$ (see tables 1 and 2 of http://economics.uchicago.edu/download/bigmac.pdf )

It was 3.06$ in 2005 and I guess it must be 3.22$ today. There is no way you could be eating twice as much in 1999 compared to now, unless you flanked elementary school :roll:


Hohoho another reading comprehension is for "loosers" advocate eh? I said a CHEESEBURGER (where I live) has pretty much doubled comparing the '99 price to todays price. I was paying about $1.05 in local currency in '99 for a CHEESEBURGER and today they are $2.05, so not quite double, but I did mention that.

The BigMac has gone up 29% in the USA since 2002 as I said. In case you are ignorant, the BIGMAC and CHEESEBURGER are two different McDonalds burgers. Don't you have some kind of perpetual motion energy device to be talking about EnergySpin?
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby EnergySpin » Sun 27 May 2007, 12:30:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'I')n case you are ignorant, the BIGMAC and CHEESEBURGER are two different McDonalds burgers. Don't you have some kind of perpetual motion energy device to be talking about EnergySpin?

I eat neither of those (especially from McDonalds), so the subtle differences between a cheeseburger and a BigMac elude me. Perpetual motion devices are not for me ... I stick to nuclear and wind and leave the doomer porn fantasies and the solar powered fairy tales to the experts.
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 27 May 2007, 18:58:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'I')n case you are ignorant, the BIGMAC and CHEESEBURGER are two different McDonalds burgers. Don't you have some kind of perpetual motion energy device to be talking about EnergySpin?

I eat neither of those (especially from McDonalds), so the subtle differences between a cheeseburger and a BigMac elude me. Perpetual motion devices are not for me ... I stick to nuclear and wind and leave the doomer porn fantasies and the solar powered fairy tales to the experts.


The difference is in the amount of grease.

A normal cheeseburger has around 18 units of grease per cubic foot of burger matter.

A McDonald's BigMac has around 17,000 units of grease per cubic foot of burger matter.

Personally, I stick to the salads and milkshakes...

As for the extra cost of energy costing someone his job:

I pay an extra $10 for gasoline. The extra money has to go somewhere, right?

Who is the final person to benefit from higher energy prices? My guess is some prince of the Saudi Royal Family.

That prince can do one of the following:

1. Put the money in a savings account, pushing down interest rates.

2. Put the money in a treasury bond, pushing down interest rates and funding some government spending project.

3. Put the money in the stock market, increasing the value of a company and freeing up the seller of the stock to do something else with his money.

4. Pay down his own personal debt giving the bank extra cash reserves to loan out to other people, (same effect as putting the money in a savings account)

5. Buy Stuff.

6. He could give the money away in the form of welfare projects for his people (which would quickly find its way back into the general global economy) or to his friends/family (who would likewise put the money back into the economy).

The money never disappears, it merely gets transfered from oil consuming countries to oil producing countries. If the oil producers spend the money on goods/services produced by the oil consumers or invest the money in an oil consuming country the net effect is 0.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby crapattack » Sun 27 May 2007, 20:37:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Starvid wrote:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Nope. We build more power lines. Creates lots of jobs and growth, by the way.

MQ responded:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The mindset that brought us here.

Starvid wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Exactly. And things have never been better.

MQ responded:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Nor the negative impact greater.

Starvid wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Off course, there is always a price to pay. In some countries people are not inclined to go that little extra bit. Around here, the environment is cleaner today than it was 100 years ago.

I'm especially interested in Starvid's assertion that "things have never been better" and his follow up that "there is always a price to pay".

"things are better"

Just what things and from what point of view? If you're a rich fuck living in the rich world ya, sure, things might be "better". If you live like most of the planet, no, "things" are not better. if you're a woman living in Saudi Arabia or Yemen, "things" are definately not better, if you're a shipwrecker living in the PCB ridden filth on the beaches of India things are not better. Sure, India and China are joining the madness, but it is madness. We are in a race to the cliff when we should be putting on the brakes. Progress and "things" are killing us.

"there is always a price to pay"

Really? We can have as much greed and inequity we want we just have to "pay for it"? Are you are referring to 70% of the other people on the planet who are living with the consequences of our greed and negligence? Citizen-slaves of the World Bank? Or just poor folks anywhere? Too bad for them just glad it's not you? Who do you nominate to pay the price? Do you have any conception of the scale of this "price"? Do you have any awareness of what callous fuck you sound like when you say shit like this? It's no wonder people who have absolutely nothing and no options are blowing themselves up just for a chance to take out a few rich white fucks who are so blind to what their lifestyle is truly costing they'll say things like "there's is always a price to pay". The only surprise is we are so surprised!

And BTW, if you are poor and living anywhere in the US "things" are also not better. You should try living on food stamps. Or perhaps you're living in Greensburg, Kansas http://www.kansas.com/static/slides/050 ... doaerials/ or Holly, Colorado where "things" are just gone forever http://www.denverpost.com/ci_5552519.

Now there is one thing about this you are saying that is probably true. We are going to pay the price and are paying the price in young soliders limbs and lives in Iraq and Afganistan. US towns getting swept off the map due to climate change and we're still screwing around doing nothing. We are simply spending our future right now and are about to "pay" very very heavily.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sun 27 May 2007, 21:46:23

The world's poor aren't significantly worse off than Europeans were in the 18th century. In fact, I think they are significantly better off.

British children who didn't live past age 5 in the 1730-1740 time period: 72%

British children who didn't live past age 5 in the 1810-1830 time period: 32%

Children in Senegal (African nation with a GDP per capita of only $850) who die before age 5: 13.7%

Iraqi children who don't survive past age 5 today: 12.5%


Brazilian children who don't survive past age 5 today: 3.5%

Child mortality statistics

Now can we go back to talking about Uranium Supply?

If not, I'll have to split this off into a new thread.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby crapattack » Sun 27 May 2007, 23:24:49

Ok, must make one reply though before you split off.

http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Facts.asp

Well worth a peak. A look at 2 highlights:

1. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')n analysis of long-term trends shows the distance between the richest and poorest countries was about:

* 3 to 1 in 1820
* 11 to 1 in 1913
* 35 to 1 in 1950
* 44 to 1 in 1973
* 72 to 1 in 1992

Source: Human Development Report 1999


2. $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or economic growth and almost all of the other indicators, the last 20 years [of the current form of globalization, from 1980 - 2000] have shown a very clear decline in progress as compared with the previous two decades [1960 - 1980]. For each indicator, countries were divided into five roughly equal groups, according to what level the countries had achieved by the start of the period (1960 or 1980). Among the findings:

* Growth: The fall in economic growth rates was most pronounced and across the board for all groups or countries.
* Life Expectancy: Progress in life expectancy was also reduced for 4 out of the 5 groups of countries, with the exception of the highest group (life expectancy 69-76 years).
* Infant and Child Mortality: Progress in reducing infant mortality was also considerably slower during the period of globalization (1980-1998) than over the previous two decades.
* Education and literacy: Progress in education also slowed during the period of globalization.

Source: Scorecard on Globalization1980-2000: Twenty Years of Diminished Progress, by Mark Weisbrot, Dean Baker, Egor Kraev and Judy Chen, Center for Economic Policy and Research, August 2001.


WAKE UP
More technology will not save us. More "things" won't save us - they are killing us.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 27 May 2007, 23:35:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'T')he world's poor aren't significantly worse off than Europeans were in the 18th century. In fact, I think they are significantly better off.

British children who didn't live past age 5 in the 1730-1740 time period: 72%

British children who didn't live past age 5 in the 1810-1830 time period: 32%

Children in Senegal (African nation with a GDP per capita of only $850) who die before age 5: 13.7%

Iraqi children who don't survive past age 5 today: 12.5%


Brazilian children who don't survive past age 5 today: 3.5%


And going around nature's corrective mechanisms has brought us to an overpopulation problem.

We killed off our predators.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby PraiseDoom » Mon 28 May 2007, 00:08:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '
')
We killed off our predators.


No we didn't. There are more of us around than ever.
User avatar
PraiseDoom
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 23 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby crapattack » Mon 28 May 2007, 02:35:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')ccording to UNICEF, 30,000 children die each day due to poverty. And they “die quietly in some of the poorest villages on earth, far removed from the scrutiny and the conscience of the world. Being meek and weak in life makes these dying multitudes even more invisible in death.

That is about 210,000 children each week, or just under 11 million children under five years of age, each year. http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Facts.asp


Tyler_JC: what was the population of Europe in the 1730's? Hmmm, let's see,

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n all, the nations of western Europe witnessed a population increase from 50 to 100 percent between 1730 and 1800. English population, for example, rose from approximately 5 million in 1700 to over 9 million at the end of the century. http://www.bartleby.com/67/1034.html


Wakey wakey sleepy heads. All that the industrial revolution did was increase population pressure by reducing infant mortality. This does not make a "better world" and has surely excellerated our race to the cliff's edge. More than twice the entire population of England in the 1730's, entirely comprised of children, dies every year in Starvid's modern "better" world.

This can happen because we are blind to it, because people like Starvid believe we are living in a better world. Because we believe that more and more technology is better for us and we are in love with our shiny bleepy "things" that we believe will save us and redeem us all at the same time. In the faceplates of our ipods we see ourselves reflected in glowing halos. Because globally we spend twice as much money on perfume than education, almost as much on ice cream than on all global health care, and vastly more on military than everything combined, that we have let 0.13% of people own 25% of the world's assets. The horrendous reality that in 2001, 497 people owned more than the combined incomes of half of humanity.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby Starvid » Mon 28 May 2007, 11:42:05

Things are better in the rich world today than they have ever been before. This is not very unexpected, nor that important. Things were good here 30 years ago too.

The important thing, what I really meant, is that a vast number of people are reaching out and getting something like an adequate standard of living. Hundreds and hundreds of millions, even billions, lift themselves out of total and abject poverty into some kind of global middle class while hundreds of millions leave the global middle class and join us (15-20 % the total human population) who are the global upper class. Those of us who own stuff like refrigerators and vacuum cleaners.

The price to pay... Humans affect their environment. Everyone does. The price you gotta pay is either living with that or paying for cleaning it up again. Some people, like the Americans, just don't seem to care about that. We do. We pay. With the exception of climate gas emissions that we really can't do that much about as we have already done most of what can be done, even if the left and greens fight so very hard to increase our emission again.

But still, if all developed countries emitted as little CO2 per capita as we do, pretty much no one would worry as much about climate change as they do now. And with hydrocarbons running out and coal being questioned... Who knows if we can ruin the climate even if we tried?

By the way, I am tired of your fascist wars. I detest them and would very much like if you stopped assaulting other countries and murdering innocent people.

Or hey, you're Canadian? Did you guys go to Iraq or not?
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 28 May 2007, 11:47:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'T')he important thing, what I really meant, is that a vast number of people are reaching out and getting something like an adequate standard of living. Hundreds and hundreds of millions, even billions, lift themselves out of total and abject poverty into some kind of global middle class while hundreds of millions leave the global middle class and join us (15-20 % the total human population) who are the global upper class. Those of us who own stuff like refrigerators and vacuum cleaners.


Yet more people than ever are in poverty, malnourished and die from starvation and disease than ever before.

The inequity between the haves and the have nots is growing.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby Starvid » Mon 28 May 2007, 11:56:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'T')he important thing, what I really meant, is that a vast number of people are reaching out and getting something like an adequate standard of living. Hundreds and hundreds of millions, even billions, lift themselves out of total and abject poverty into some kind of global middle class while hundreds of millions leave the global middle class and join us (15-20 % the total human population) who are the global upper class. Those of us who own stuff like refrigerators and vacuum cleaners.


Yet more people than ever are in poverty, malnourished and die from starvation and disease than ever before.

The inequity between the haves and the have nots is growing.

Off course, we could all kill ourselves. Then no one would be poor, malnourished or starving.

The reason poverty grew so much is that populations grew due to lower mortality in the undeveloped world. The same thing happened in the developed world way back. But with greater wealth, population growth fell and then turned negative. Vast parts of the world have until rather recently been denied the chance to improve the lots of their citizens. Now that is changing. They are also going through the great population rollover. Birthrates have been falling, and then crashing, since the 60's.

Now the question is, can the planet take 6, 7 or 8 billion people living at an adequate standard of living, not to mention the standards 15-20 % of us (that's you and me) live at?

Frankly, I don't know, and I don't think anyone does. But we're going to find out. And there is no reason to fret about this, as it is inevitable anyway.


(If it weren't for the small detail called Peak oil...)
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 28 May 2007, 12:09:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', ' ')Now the question is, can the planet take 6, 7 or 8 billion people living at an adequate standard of living, not to mention the standards 15-20 % of us (that's you and me) live at?

Frankly, I don't know, and I don't think anyone does. But we're going to find out. And there is no reason to fret about this, as it is inevitable anyway.


The leading pherologists estimate that the earth can support 2 to 3 billion on a sustainable basis.

We may not know exactly, but how far off the mark can they be?

Suffice to say, the number is less than what we have now.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby PraiseDoom » Mon 28 May 2007, 12:58:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'T')he important thing, what I really meant, is that a vast number of people are reaching out and getting something like an adequate standard of living. Hundreds and hundreds of millions, even billions, lift themselves out of total and abject poverty into some kind of global middle class while hundreds of millions leave the global middle class and join us (15-20 % the total human population) who are the global upper class. Those of us who own stuff like refrigerators and vacuum cleaners.


Yet more people than ever are in poverty, malnourished and die from starvation and disease than ever before.

The inequity between the haves and the have nots is growing.


Are you suggesting something like Communism might be the answer, and do you think it can be achieved before we slide into the Gorge? And I thought we were supposed to be talking about uranium?
User avatar
PraiseDoom
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 23 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Is Life Getting Better? (Cheeseburgers and Child Mortali

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Mon 28 May 2007, 14:25:57

Crapattack, nice to meet you - what a great poster!

Getting back to hamburgers, I was in Sacramento, and stopped in at a Carl's Jr. - I hadn't been in one of those in years. So, they had all these "Value Meals" that were something like $7, and all I wanted was a jalapeno burger. And a cup of water - it was a hot day and water sounded better than anything. So, I had that and it was like $3, it was huge, it was a very good meal. But that is not what most people are buying when they go in there, they sort of point and grunt, at the largest pictures on the menual which are .... the "value meals".

Now I can't even fault 'em that badly for that, since most Americans get a 1/2-hour lunch hour, and maybe 10 minutes if they're lucky to actually eat. When you're in a crowd of hungry people with literally seconds to decide and order, point and grunt at the biggest picture gets you fed.

So it's not the slob with the bleary eyes from working from 6AM on with no food pointing and grunting, it's the way we do things, cogs in the machine, where point and grunt at the biggest picture might be the only "individual" act you're allowed to do all day, that is the problem.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Uranium Supply

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 28 May 2007, 17:14:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', 'W')ith the exception of climate gas emissions that we really can't do that much about as we have already done most of what can be done, even if the left and greens fight so very hard to increase our emission again.

But still, if all developed countries emitted as little CO2 per capita as we do, pretty much no one would worry as much about climate change as they do now.


Its a nice boast but its not true.[smilie=eusa_boohoo.gif]

Sweden emits about 6 tons of CO2 per person per year.

There are over a hundred countries with lower per capita CO2 emissions then Sweden.

The 6 tons of CO2 emitted by every Swedish person every year builds up in the atmosphere just like the CO2 emitted by people in other rich countries, and helps to cause Global Warming. Sweden, like every other rich country, would have to reduce their CO2 emissions to near zero to stop adding new CO2 into the atmosphere. [smilie=headbang.gif]
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Is Life Getting Better? (Cheeseburgers and Child Mortali

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Mon 28 May 2007, 17:46:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')akey wakey sleepy heads. All that the industrial revolution did was increase population pressure by reducing infant mortality. This does not make a "better world" and has surely excellerated our race to the cliff's edge. More than twice the entire population of England in the 1730's, entirely comprised of children, dies every year in Starvid's modern "better" world.


Reducing child mortality does not make for a "better world"?!?! :shock:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he inequity between the haves and the have nots is growing.


Sure and in 1975, Bill Gates had a net worth of say, two times the national average.

Now his wealth exceeds theirs by a ratio of say, 1,000,000 to 1.

Does that mean we are half a million times poorer than we were in 1975?

Or could it be that Bill Gates just got a lot wealthier, a lot faster than they did?

The only way that inequity really matters is if the rich are stealing wealth from the poor and reducing the average standard of living of the poor over time.

So far, I don't see that happening. The countries that have seen shrinking per capita GDP over the past couple decades can blame most of their problems on AIDS, terrible dictatorships, or civil war.

As for uncontrolled population growth...

Take a look at America's fertility rate over time. As we became richer, our fertility rate plummeted even without birth control, legalized abortion, voting rights for women, economic opportunity for women, etc.

Image
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron