Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Jack » Sat 19 May 2007, 23:30:47

Last night, I came across an interesting piece on a local station, during the weather. I think the numbers are right, but please bear in mind they are based on recollection. The final number is what was broadcast - it was attention-getting.

According to the item, the Earth has a large area, but only about 25% is land. And of the land, only about 10% is viable to grow crops.

Now - the bottom line, which I do remember clearly - is that the Earth supports 1,000 people with every ONE square mile of viable cropland. Which means about two-thirds of an acre per person.

This brings into focus the upcoming problem with bio-fuels competing with crops. We don't have much margin. Still worse, as the various fisheries are depleted, we have little to fall back on.

As I mentioned, this was broadcast on a network station, during the 10PM weather-cast.

What does it mean? I'm not sure. Perhaps the message about a coming dieoff is being sent?

Your thoughts?
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Sat 19 May 2007, 23:54:29

Bio-fuels are a joke, we'll never have enough crops to simultaneously provide adequate amounts of fuel and adequate amounts of food. It's one or the other. It's always funny when someone says, "I'm not worried about peak oil because we have a solution... bio-fuels." So what they are basically saying is that they'd rather drive than eat. Morons.
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Jack » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:21:13

Sure, that's certainly true - but the point is....

There are two-thirds of an acre per person to grow crops.

Supplemented, I suppose, by pastured animals and seafood.

What happens when natural gas based fertilizers become less available?

What happens as the population grows?
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby NEOPO » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:31:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'S')ure, that's certainly true - but the point is....

There are two-thirds of an acre per person to grow crops.

Supplemented, I suppose, by pastured animals and seafood.

What happens when natural gas based fertilizers become less available?

What happens as the population grows?


We eat people? :)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:31:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'S')ure, that's certainly true - but the point is....

There are two-thirds of an acre per person to grow crops.

Supplemented, I suppose, by pastured animals and seafood.

What happens when natural gas based fertilizers become less available?

What happens as the population grows?


I suspect the arable land is not evenly distributed. Some places (countries) will be better off than others. How climate change affects this is a large uncertainty.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:36:00

Q: What happens when a significant portion of that 2/3 of an acre per person is diverted from food production to producing fuel for personal vehicles??

A: A costlier and less penetrable wall between Mexico and the US must be built, for starters.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby NEOPO » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:36:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'S')ure, that's certainly true - but the point is....

There are two-thirds of an acre per person to grow crops.

Supplemented, I suppose, by pastured animals and seafood.

What happens when natural gas based fertilizers become less available?

What happens as the population grows?


I suspect the arable land is not evenly distributed. Some places (countries) will be better off than others. How climate change affects this is a large uncertainty.


Meaning, we will eat people? :-D
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Jack » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:41:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', '
')Meaning, we will eat people? :-D


Could be. But we might decide to convert them to fuel.

Once again, food and fuel compete.

That's why it's so hard to get a head these days. As the head-shrinking cannibal said...

8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Sun 20 May 2007, 00:44:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'S')ure, that's certainly true - but the point is....

There are two-thirds of an acre per person to grow crops.

Supplemented, I suppose, by pastured animals and seafood.

What happens when natural gas based fertilizers become less available?

What happens as the population grows?


What's gonna happen? I guess most people are gonna starve to death and the survivors will have to resort to cannibalism. That's what the human race gets for breeding like rabbits. We all have the "overpopulation is a myth" crowd to thank for this. And there are plenty of them... at least 90% of the people I talk to think overpopulation is a myth.

Anyways, I sense that overpopulation will soon be a thing of the past. After a nice die-off, anyways.
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby SevenTen » Sun 20 May 2007, 01:39:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'W')hat does it mean? I'm not sure. Perhaps the message about a coming dieoff is being sent?

I think that if the message were received by the bulk of the masses, there would be widespread panic.

Someone said the only thing preventing a shitstorm from breaking out is ignorance. If the message was getting out, it wasn't on purpose.

In regards to what you heard ... the land area of the planet is 148,939,100 km², multiply by 13.3%, divide by 6.5 billion = 0.003048 km² per person. This is actually 0.753 acres, more than 2/3.

That's still really small.

km² to acre conversion
CIA World Fact Book - arable land
Earth land area
User avatar
SevenTen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat 07 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Ayame » Sun 20 May 2007, 03:47:18

Well, all we need to do is look at a graph like this one to see that there is a problem and that growth in population like we have been experiencing is definitely not sustainable. It's not just because of people reproducing like rabbits it's also because people stopped dying like flies from disease due to medical advances over the past 100 years.

Concerning the land situation, yes it's very very tight. We humans are very good at exploiting resources to the maximum.
Ayame
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu 29 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby TT » Sun 20 May 2007, 04:24:07

How much of the arable land has been used to build extensive housing estates?
User avatar
TT
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 278
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Victoria, Australia

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby killJOY » Sun 20 May 2007, 07:22:47

Isn't it funny?

We sit here, watching this happen right under our noses.

We calculate yields & carrying capacities with our calculators.

We discuss it here on the internetss on fancy machines.

It keeps happening right under our noses.

Our helplessness is charming.
Peak oil = comet Kohoutek.
User avatar
killJOY
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2220
Joined: Mon 21 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: ^NNE^

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Jack » Sun 20 May 2007, 08:34:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', 'I') think that if the message were received by the bulk of the masses, there would be widespread panic.


I agree completely. Which makes it all the more surprising that the weather man on the ABC affiliate would broadcast the numbers. Granted that he appears to have simplified it for the masses, it is still -IMO - quite remarkable that he said anything.

And thank you for doing the numbers. If anything, your numbers are more disturbing, because of their austere precision.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby TheTurtle » Sun 20 May 2007, 09:12:29

China has had extensive experience with famine and mass starvation.

China is losing arable land by the minute (due to desertification and their newfound penchant for constructing miles and miles of super highways).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut worried over surging crop prices China is now clamping down on the use of corn and other edible grains for producing biofuel. While it wants to support the growth of alternative energy sources, Beijing says the issue of national food security should take precedence over the country's green agenda.

ENERGY-CHINA: Biofuels Eating Into Food Grain Stocks

Just one nation's take on the issue; because a billion hungry citizens are a billion ANGRY citizens ... 8O
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby SevenTen » Sun 20 May 2007, 13:42:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', 'I') think that if the message were received by the bulk of the masses, there would be widespread panic.


I agree completely. Which makes it all the more surprising that the weather man on the ABC affiliate would broadcast the numbers. Granted that he appears to have simplified it for the masses, it is still -IMO - quite remarkable that he said anything.

And thank you for doing the numbers. If anything, your numbers are more disturbing, because of their austere precision.

It just occurred to me, would widespread panic provide a benefit to anyone? Would it be a better alternative than some other outcome? Could it be purposefully initiated, so that it could be dealt with in a planned, managed way, instead of letting it happen randomly at some point in the future?

Or could the weatherman have been reading PO or TOD, and interjected that on his own? Does the guy still have a job? If he doesn't still have his job, it would be because they didn't want to start a panic.

I'm not keen on them either wanting to start a panic, or wanting to suppress a panic. I'd rather start the panic, on my own timetable. "Ok, I'm ready, the rest of you can now start freaking out." :)

Yes, our helplessness is adorable, isn't it? The flipside of King Canute giving orders to the tides, is when we howl at the night in impotent defiance of its darkness. Yet when we attempt to defy our own darkness, it is in silence.
User avatar
SevenTen
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat 07 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Jack » Sun 20 May 2007, 16:30:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', 'I')t just occurred to me, would widespread panic provide a benefit to anyone? Would it be a better alternative than some other outcome? Could it be purposefully initiated, so that it could be dealt with in a planned, managed way, instead of letting it happen randomly at some point in the future?


Sure. A frightened people is an easily controlled people. Get the masses quaking in their boots and they will plead for the very measures they would have cursed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', '
')Or could the weatherman have been reading PO or TOD, and interjected that on his own? Does the guy still have a job? If he doesn't still have his job, it would be because they didn't want to start a panic.


I suspect exactly this. He's been at the station many years, and is reasonably popular - however, he's getting older, so his days in TV may be numbered. He does still have a job - but this is just one, local station. I doubt many people made the connection between land area and die-off.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SevenTen', 'Y')es, our helplessness is adorable, isn't it? The flipside of King Canute giving orders to the tides, is when we howl at the night in impotent defiance of its darkness. Yet when we attempt to defy our own darkness, it is in silence.


In silence, in fear - and, more often than not, the darkness wins.
Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn! [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby greenworm » Sun 20 May 2007, 19:33:49

2/3 an acre is way off.


I feed myself and my wife on roughly 7000 sq. feet, which is roughly a quarter of your two thirds.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Jack » Sun 20 May 2007, 20:13:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '2')/3 an acre is way off.


Hmm? I repeated the calculations, and my final numbers are very close to SevenTen's at 0.75. That doesn't seem to be such a great discrepency.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '
')I feed myself and my wife on roughly 7000 sq. feet, which is roughly a quarter of your two thirds.


Is that 100% of your caloric intake?
Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn! [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Crops, Dieoff, and the MSM

Unread postby Chaparral » Mon 21 May 2007, 04:19:02

We'll be eating lower on the food chain: those of us that are still around that is.

I suspect the CAFOs will be the first local casualties of the food to fuel conversions. Why feed the unclean masses real cows when you can feed them cow-flavored corn and soybean mush? Why feed them chickens when you can feed them chicken-flavored corn and soybean mush?
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron