by Denny » Fri 11 May 2007, 00:34:51
I am just thinking of Canada, and maybe the U.S.A., as that is what I am familiar with. Population density is not really so much different. Yes, if you look at the whole country, but in the populated areas, I don't the density of developed neighbourhoods is any different today, maybe even less dense.
If the typical family was cut to just 3 gallons of gas per week, and air conditioning was abolished expect for the odd day the temp exceeds say 30 degrees, don't you think our continental resources would support that for a long time to come? Over time, some larger homes could be turned into flats, so that the heating cost was spread over more people. It used to be more common.
If I look at the traffic in say Toronto today, I suspect that if everybody left their cars at home, the commute could still be done, but it would require really staggering the work day hours. Say people were to come in between 6:30 and 10:30 and leave between 2:30 and 7:30 pm. I say that as about half of the commuters today use transit. That would shift to about 90% I assume. Over time, as more transit equipment was introduced, this would change too and becomce more accommodating. Some cities, like London have about 80% of the people using transit, so it can be done, its just in the economics.
As for population density, Toronto city proper had about 600,000 people in WW2, and today it has 2.3 million, but they are spread over an area about four times as large. I'd think Toronto is typical of North American cities in this pop. growth and spread regard.
There are all kinds of basic commodities in which we are self sufficient, we are really lucked out here compared to much of the world. We have iron, copper, nickel, forests, and the best farm land in the world. We should be laughing, we have it so good.