by Specop_007 » Wed 09 May 2007, 10:07:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ebyss', '
')Despite the fact that I find controlled game hunting for sport extremely distasteful, I do appreciate that without it things would be a lot worse for the animals. Provided the kills are used for food, I have less of a problem with it. But when species are SO endangered, I'm afraid all I see is selfishness on the part of the hunter. I understand primal instincts, I really do, but guns aren't part of it - if you want it to be a truly primal experience, then get thee a pointy stick and see how you fare. Standing back and shooting with a gun gives you much better odds than with any other weapon (bows included, despite the fact that they are a missile weapon and can be used from a distance) and really, one is removed from the "primal", real human element of it.
Hunting lions and rhino on a game reserve for no reason other than to shoot one just ain't right - they're dwindling as a species, the gene pool gets smaller and smaller. But again, game reserves control and conserve the populations of all their animals - and to afford it they must allow X amounts of animals to be killed each year. I understand that - but why any human being would want to shoot an endangered animal merely for the experience is beyond me. Gazelles, wildebeest and other plentiful herbivores - that's different. But rhino, lions and elephants? The real man, the real primal man, understands that he must take only what the Earth can spare, and right now she cannot spare these animals for one reason and one reason only - man has already brought them to the precipice of extinction. The real hunter, the one that is truly "man", would walk away. He may regret missing the experience, but he would have done the right thing so that, hopefully, future generations will have the chance just to see these animals, let alone hunt them (and who knows, maybe with concerted efforts we will one day be overrun with the things and they'll need to be controlled, lol).
I have ZERO problem with people hunting animals for meat and population/pest control (but again, the carcass should be utilised). I do have a problem with people killing an endangered animal for the sake of it.
I understand what your saying although I dont agree.
The simple fact is its a numbers game. The conservation or park rangers determine they can support X animals. If the number is high then animals will be destroyed. Period. End of story.
You can either send out Mr. Ranger to shoot them and let them lie, or you can charge some round eye an assload of money to come do the shooting for you. In the big picture having some guy come in and paying you to shoot them is all around a better experience. The populations remain in control and you expand you coffers instead of just keeping the population in control.
I cant speak to it with any degree of authority but I would assume if one had enough money and knew the right people he could be given a "free pass" so to speak to start shooting but thats another story.
Think of it as the lesser of the evils. Rather then just killing animals to meet population controls, they are making money to do the same thing.
Now the bigger issue (to me) is the loss of land the animals use. Ultimately the amount of land drives the allowable populations. If you lose land you lose the ability to support large numbers of animals.
While we're on the subject though I have an interesting story that most people wouldnt stop to consider.
I moved from Nebraska to Kansas some time ago, but was born and spent most of my life in Nebraska. When I was back home late last year I was talking to my grandfather who loves to hunt. He mentioned that the can insurance agencies contacted the Nebraska Game and Parks and said if deer populations didnt come down Nebraska residents would face a hefty increase for car insurance.
Why?
The amount of claims for collisions with deer had sharply increased. So either the population is brought down thus minimizing auto accidents or the insurance rates were coming up. I know they issued alot of permits that year, my grandfather and grandmother alone bagged 8 deer (all on legal permits).
Bet you didnt think your insurance agency had a hand in setting population numbers did you. What a tangled web we weave.....