Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 20:01:45

I had a pointed discussion with a friend recently about peak oil and the economic ramifications. In response, he sent his investment firm the following e-mail:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'h')ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fo3sxhBylw

This link will take you to a short report from CNBC that was posted on YouTube - about Peak Oil. In addition to stating that is very near, the experts talk about the disasterous impact it will have on our economy.

So, it would be good to know what you all have in mind. When the oil shocks hit, it will be very bad. Obviously, we don't want to lose what we have earned. How will you protect our funds when there is essentially nowhere to hide?

J


This was their response:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J'),

Thank you for your email. I have provided below some commentary from our Director of Research, (name edited out), regarding peak oil, which I think you will find insightful.

We do not have a great way to calibrate when the world will run out of oil, but we can take guidance by two simple notions. One is that the 20th century was marked by repeated periods of fear the world would run out of oil by a certain date, and later the estimates proved too dire because underestimating supply potential. The other is that markets are smart and should price the eventuality long in advance of the event. If oil supply does indeed have a finite endpoint, there will be a shift in energy sources the world is dependent on. This might involve a big run-up in the price of oil at the beginning of that transition, but the very fact the price would rise would be a cause for the transition to occur promptly. As soon as it becomes cheaper to use some alternative energy source, producers and consumers will adapt. Until such time, it makes sense to keep using oil products. Any time there are big transitions, winners and losers are created, and such periods may be marked by recessions and such, but we have no reason to believe any abnormal dire periods are coming any time soon related to this issue.

In addition, I have attached a research piece from one of the most prominent energy research firms that specifically addressed peak oil in a report to Congress. This should provide you with the other side of the argument. Here is their basic argument:

The peak oil debate continues to rage without any obvious progress. However, upon examination, the peak oil theory falls down because of serious flaws in logic and application. CERA's view, based on two decades of research, is highly unpopular in peakist circles. However, ours is not a view of unlimited resource. A plateau will occur-but not tomorrow, and supply will not "run dry" soon thereafter. We hold that aboveground factors will play the major role in dictating the end of the age of oil.

1. Based on a detailed bottom-up approach, CERA sees no evidence of a peak before 2030. Moreover, global production will eventually follow an undulating plateau for one or more decades before declining slowly. Global resources, including both conventional and unconventional oils, are adequate to support strong production growth and a period on an undulating plateau.

2. Despite his valuable contribution, M. King Hubbert's methodology falls down because it does not consider likely resource growth, application of new technology, basic commercial factors, or the impact of geopolitics on production. His approach does not work in all cases-including on the United States itself-and cannot reliably model a global production outlook. Put more simply, the case for the imminent peak is flawed. As it is, production in 2005 in the Lower 48 in the United States was 66 percent higher than Hubbert projected.

3.The debate should now move toward a better understanding of the key drivers of production, including the scale of global resources and the likely production outlook, which form the core of current disagreements and confusion.

Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates

Please let me know if you have any additional questions or if you would like to discuss this information in more detail.

Best regards,


"Joe Blow"
Investment Counselor
"In-the-dark" Investments


This is a sad case of buying into the CERA report 100%.

How many other investment counselors and investment firms will follow suit?

The sentence in bold tells you they have not a clue.

How will people protect their funds when there is essentially nowhere to hide?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby Twilight » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 20:08:50

Maybe that's their 'Standard' Customer reply.

I wouldn't be surprised if the real customers get less of a copy & paste service. I would imagine a few tens of millions of dollars cuts through the bullshit fast.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 21:13:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow many other investment counselors and investment firms will follow suit?


All of them. I've tried bring up this subject to a friend that is an investment counselor. I figure he should know what's happening in the energy world (PO). I think they all are brainwashed. :sad:
vision-master
 

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby SchroedingersCat » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 21:26:03

The irony here is that peak oil is going to cause most of its initial damage by stomping on the house of cards that is the world's current hallucinated economy.

You shall reap what ye sow.
Civilization is a personal choice.
SchroedingersCat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu 26 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The ragged edge

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby venky » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 21:55:45

I believe that a near term economic catastrophe or collapse is unlikely though prolonged recession marked by continuous oil price shocks might achieve a similar result over a period of decades.

I think the main flaw in their reasoning is assuming that alternatives will allow us to continue business as usual. Barring breakthroughs in technology that seem unlikely , it is much more likely that 20-30 years from we will be looking at running our economy at perhaps about half to two thirds of the current energy supply with a net decline each year. That almost invariably will mean less economic activity. While I dont believe our economies will collapse, a lot of people will struggle, in finding jobs, protecting their savings and investments.........
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 22:06:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '.')..it is much more likely that 20-30 years from we will be looking at running our economy at perhaps about half to two thirds of the current energy supply with a net decline each year. That almost invariably will mean less economic activity. While I dont believe our economies will collapse, a lot of people will struggle, in finding jobs, protecting their savings and investments.........


Struggle? Finding jobs? How about keeping most service jobs at all?

How can you have investments with no growth or actually declining economic activity?

No growth means no return on any investment.

A "prolonged recession", is by definition, a depression.

Your above quote is at odds with itself.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 22:52:18

"No growth means no return on any investment."

I disagree with that statement.

Just because the entire economy isn't growing as an aggregate, does not mean that some sectors or some companies could not be growing and thus providing a growth avenue.

There will always be some growth industry somewhere, the problem is that the number of growth industry will be overtaken by the number of "decline" industries when we begin to experience energy shortages.

Most of the new growth will come from cannibalizing other businesses.

For example, Wal*Mart grows by killing small, local retailers. Are they a "growth industry"? I would be reluctant to call the addition of a Wal*Mart to one's town at the expense of two dozen other shops a "growing economy". And yet Wal*Mart provides a return on investment despite the overall decline in that town's economic output.

I know I'm splitting hairs, but to say that Peak Oil means the end of all investment has just never made sense to me.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby Jack » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 22:58:52

Delving back into memory - a hazardous journey - I recall that the U.S. did extensive planning for a full-scale nuclear exchange with the Soviets.

Their expectation was that the markets would shut down temporarily, that the economy would regress about 20 years, and that the population would be reduced by about 15% - 20%. (Again, be cautioned that my memory may be faulty).

We can contrast this with Peak Oil. In a nuclear exchange, infrastructure is instantly destroyed. With Peak Oil, it's more likely to slowly degrade, except in those instances where civil unrest damages it. Of course, our society may well be less cohesive than it was in the nuclear war planning days.

So...what does this mean for investments? Probably the markets won't instantly implode. It is possible they could go into a downward trend, with fluctuations above and below the trend line. Probably (not certainly - governments might interfere) energy-oriented investments will appreciate. Probably (again, not certainly), precious metals oriented investments will appreciate. Probably, insurance-oriented, treasury bond based, and FDIC insured investments will survive to some degree.

But I do suspect this won't occur in one terrible instant. Rather, the initial patterns will stretch over a decade or more.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby pup55 » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 23:03:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')oe Blow"
Investment Counselor
"In-the-dark" Investments


Here's the thing. If Mr. Blow was really a good investment counselor, and not just out to make a fast buck, he would acknowledge the fact that the future is, by definition uncertain, and try to set up people's portfolios to be peril-resistant, with some growth stuff that will party on if there is one, and some posterior-covering investments if TSHTF.

The fact that he is speculating on an optimistic scenario is a real danger sign that this character is commission driven, rather than looking out for his clients.

A much better response would be someting like this:

"Dear potential client, we are aware of the PO theory, and while we mainly believe in CERA, we also acknowledge that the PO theory has some validity, and this validity carries with it some risk. As part of our friendly package of investment services, and as a responsible investment advisory firm that is dedicated to the long term growth of our clients' portfolios regardless of what happens, we have designed this posterior-covering investment strategy with some built in protection and capital preservation in the event of an event", etc. etc.

This way, he does not scare anybody away with doomer talk, and acknowledges that anything can happen. In fact, it would be interesting to send your friend's Email to about 50 of these guys and see how many come back reciting the CERA line, and how many do not.

For some reason a lot of these corporate types, particularly sales guys, are high on the "judgemental" and you cannot really convince them otherwise.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 23:33:53

Those guy's are in it for only the money.
vision-master
 

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby venky » Fri 13 Apr 2007, 23:40:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '.')..it is much more likely that 20-30 years from we will be looking at running our economy at perhaps about half to two thirds of the current energy supply with a net decline each year. That almost invariably will mean less economic activity. While I dont believe our economies will collapse, a lot of people will struggle, in finding jobs, protecting their savings and investments.........


Struggle? Finding jobs? How about keeping most service jobs at all?

How can you have investments with no growth or actually declining economic activity?

No growth means no return on any investment.

A "prolonged recession", is by definition, a depression.

Your above quote is at odds with itself.


I am not convinced of the argument that end of growth as a whole means end to all possibilities of investment (like Tyler said) or or a collapse of a significant portion of our economy. After all society did not collapse during the great depression even if there was substantially lesser economic activity.
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 01:02:30

Quote:
"As soon as it becomes cheaper to use some alternative energy source, producers and consumers will adapt. "
There is no substitute for natural gas fertilizers, nor is there a ready substitute for home heating or driving fuels. This might as well say as soon as it become cheaper to die producers and consumers will do so. If there is no alternative, their logic doesn't work.

"We hold that aboveground factors will play the major role in dictating the end of the age of oil. "
Demand destruction?

"1. Based on a detailed bottom-up approach, CERA sees no evidence of a peak before 2030. "
CERA is nuts!

"2. Despite his valuable contribution, M. King Hubbert's methodology falls down because it does not consider likely resource growth, application of new technology"
All these factors have historically had no impact on the depletion curves for oil or metals.
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt...


venky
"a lot of people will struggle"
Yeah, starving for food...

pup55
"For some reason a lot of these corporate types, particularly sales guys, are high on the "judgemental" and you cannot really convince them otherwise."

My wife was signing up for a bank account today and the banker was telling some bullshit about how giving them your work number in case they need to contact you for some important info. I pointed out that yeah, they want to know where she works so if she is cutting phony checks they can find her quicker. The banker said, "yeah that's the other reason..." The thing is in business, unless you are talking directly to the owners of a company, you are not allowed to talk about negative things, even if they are the truth. That is American corporate culture. So you are required to spew bullshit and positive spin about things that are in no way positive. So it is not that these people cannot be convinced, just in American businesses they are not allowed to talk about anything negative.

venky
"I am not convinced of the argument that end of growth as a whole means end to all possibilities of investment (like Tyler said) or or a collapse of a significant portion of our economy. After all society did not collapse during the great depression even if there was substantially lesser economic activity"

If you are in a bread line hoping for food, society has collapsed (investment portfolios of the wealthy be dammed). :P

So what is the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?
EROEI is not a problem.
Peak oil will not happen, but if/when it does it will be no trouble at all.
The moon will provide our electric power with Helium-3
Helium-3 will provide us with Hydrogen for our Hydrogen Economy!
Trust big brother!!!
Or not.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 01:29:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', ' ')I know I'm splitting hairs, but to say that Peak Oil means the end of all investment has just never made sense to me.


Hard to think any other way isn't it?

Time to start.

Peak oil and the terminal decline of cheap, readily available fossil fuel energy, means the end of growth, even sustainable growth, as that is an oxymoron.

Peak oil means the end of growth as we know it and the assured return on investment. People may still invest, but there will be no guarantee of a long-term assured return.

Money will not work for you, you will work for money.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ost of the new growth will come from cannibalizing other businesses.


That isn't growth, that is switching the end use.

In the future, where will the energy come from for a new growth industry to cannibalize those in decline?

Remember, we are losing these businesses so supply can meet demand.

There is no "spare energy" for new growth. What will we use for energy for the 3 billion newcomers?

It takes energy to conserve or increase efficiency.

Hard to get your head around the fact that it takes energy to do anything.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 01:36:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', ' ') After all society did not collapse during the great depression even if there was substantially lesser economic activity.


In 1930, just before the onset of the Great Depression, we peaked in oil discovery.

We were the largest producer and exporter of energy world-wide.

We were the largest producer of manufactured goods.

We were the largest creditor nation in the world.

Now, we are the complete opposite.

But bottom line, there was no energy shortage.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby cube » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 01:39:11

I've noticed that MOST people think of investment as a 1 directional system...up. I can only imagine the absolute horror on an "investment advisor's" face if I were to tell him / her that personally I'm equally psychologically comfortable going short or long. :roll:

PO will destroy the stock market for good. The stock market as we know it today was invented in England during the industrial revolution about 300 years ago. Is it a happy coincidence that the stock market was invented at the time when humanity discovered how to harness the power of fossil fuels?

Fossil fuels/cheap energy makes it possible to have an economy based on perpetual expansion.
There can be no stock market without perpetual expansion.
The Dow Jones can't go up if you live in a steady state economy. If stocks can't go up then nobody is going to buy them --> no stock market. It's that simple.

BTW it's perfectly possible to have a commodity futures exchange in a steady state economy. However that's a totally different game. That's based on the idea that somebody has to lose so somebody else can win (aka a zero-sum game).
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby mmasters » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 01:39:52

Well if it's any consolation I used to work for Goldman Sachs and I currently work for one of the world's largest banks.

I work in the middleoffice/backoffice so I'm not where the investment decisions are made, but processed. Anyhow through my experience most people inside these places are VERY clueless on the big picture though they like to think they're part of something "important".

I personally think we have a few years of globalization followed by a global depression. Most all investments will be wiped out. Gold will form a huge bubble in the crash and then crash itself at dizzying heights. Best bet is to buy gold and when the disaster hits begin to move towards cash.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby bshirt » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 05:56:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mmasters', 'J')ust look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destory health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality.


Wow....awesome statement there.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby JasonHam » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 06:20:28

I think most people/business/government overlook the most important aspect to Peak Oil. OverPopulation. To me, that is the crux of the problem. There are going to be an enormous amount of people that will have to go without. This is going to create all kinds of problems and not just with the worlds energy supply.
User avatar
JasonHam
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby cube » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 16:25:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JasonHam', 'I') think most people/business/government overlook the most important aspect to Peak Oil. OverPopulation. To me, that is the crux of the problem. There are going to be an enormous amount of people that will have to go without. This is going to create all kinds of problems and not just with the worlds energy supply.
oops yeah I forgot about that....if there's going to be a massive die off then there will be less potential customers in the future to buy stocks. I guess that would be considered "bearish". :roll:

Unfortunately many people think that just because twice as many transistors can be stacked onto a chip every 2 years, that must mean everything else in life must also go up. Obviously that is not true. You can't grow twice as many bushels of corn on the same acre every 2 years that's for sure.

We quite often talk about a rise in energy prices here on PO.com which I guess is to be expected. However it's not just energy...take a look at the price of corn, wheat, cattle, rice. With these staple food price increases maybe there's a mini - die off happening right now in slow motion in the 3rd world. who knows?
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Maybe the biggest economic ramification of peak oil?

Unread postby Twilight » Sat 14 Apr 2007, 19:05:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JasonHam', 'I') think most people/business/government overlook the most important aspect to Peak Oil. OverPopulation. To me, that is the crux of the problem. There are going to be an enormous amount of people that will have to go without. This is going to create all kinds of problems and not just with the worlds energy supply.

oops yeah I forgot about that...

You can't grow twice as many bushels of corn on the same acre every 2 years that's for sure.

I find myself losing sight of this too sometimes. It is too easy to focus on some technological issue and forget that peak oil is not necessary for collapse at all, it simply promises to accelerate a process which has only one conclusion.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron