by Heineken » Wed 11 Apr 2007, 22:13:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Commanding_Heights', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'N')o one has mentioned the labor (and time) involved in heating one's place entirely with wood.
As someone who heats entirely with wood, I can tell you that this is a huge oversight.
Also, Gideon is right: There is an inverse relationship between how fast wood grows and how much heat energy it supplies. That is because the slower wood grows, the denser it is, and vice versa. "Fast-growing" methods (like coppicing) aren't a magic bullet.
Wood can play an energy role in a future world, but it will be a radically different world with far fewer people.
Do you have any links/docs that dismiss coppicing as a "magic bullet"? I'm truly not trying to be a smart ass, I'd really like to read some opposing view points. My understanding is that even though the density of the wood might not be as much and the btu's not as high, the enormous growth rate more that compensates for that. I even tried a coppice experiment with a 1/4 acre wooded lot I own that has mainly poplar. (I know, I know not the best wood for heat but it is a fast grower) I was able to cut more than enough coppiced wood with some to boot in a 3 year time span.
I've also heard of people chopping the coppiced wood into bits and getting a larger return (over the long term) from wood stoves due to increased mass and less space for oxygen. Kinda like coals putting off heat for days. I know the heat wouldn't be as hot but it does make sense that maybe the wood would burn/smolder longer.
But like I said this is just something I've read/heard here and there and have no proof.
When you refer to labor involved are you referring to cutting, hauling, stacking or loading the stove. I'm guessing all of the above.
Not to beat a dead horse but coppiced woods are once again much easier to deal with in this sense because you're not dealing with trees weighing tons that require chain saws, and lots of feul for hauling. They also take a lot less time to dry.
I'm not trying to bash coppicing. For some situations I can see how it would make sense, such as, perhaps, for people with a lot of open land and relatively few trees. No, I don't have any links, just my own experience with wood and wood-burning.
Cutting coppiced wood still requires a chainsaw unless you have a very short winter (like maybe two days long).
I don't agree that methods (or species) that promote fast growth compensate for the low-density wood that results. Low-density wood tends not to form coals, which is crucial to making a hot, long-burning, clean fire. What you tend to end up with with low-density wood is a lot of smoky fluff and a fire that needs constant tending and refueling. Not to mention less heat. I'd think that chopping coppiced wood (or any wood) into tiny bits and trying to burn the result would make the problem even worse unless the stove is equipped to handle that (like a pellet stove).
Yes, the labor involves all of those things plus splitting (a biggie), cleaning out the ashes and disposing of them (I put them in my garden), chainsaw maintenance, and periodically cleaning the stovepipe (I do it just annually, but some authorities recommend more frequent cleanings). I also have to dismantle my catalytic combuster and clean it, along with the area where the pipe enters the stove, which collects creosote particles. (I hate the catalytic combuster, but I'm stuck with it for now since I have a 1980s-era Englander.)
Oh, and don't forget collecting (or making) kindling. Very important.
And then all the work in keeping the fire running just right. Many adjustments during the day, and many trips to the woodshed over the course of a week.
So between the labor items you listed and the ones I added, labor is a huge component of wood heating. I don't mind the work, and I'm used to it. But it's there, a big fat reality of this way of life.
I use mostly white oak, taken from thinning cuts to improve my stand. It's a wonderful wood. I'd burn hickory (which is even better), but I don't have much hickory and I'm trying to encourage its reestablishment on my land.