Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby RdSnt » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 20:52:38

Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby DantesPeak » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 21:04:03

I generally agree with his conclusions but some of the charts on imports into the US appear to be off. For example, imports into the US from Canada have been increasing over the last year - but his chart shows otherwise.

The key thing on exports is that throughout 2005 and 2006, US crude imports were on a plateau of about 10 million barrels per day. It appears to be slipping towards 9.6 to 9.7 mbpd right now. When you consider that exports should increase as US consumption increases, and prodcution stagnates, you realize there is a serious problem coming down the line.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby ohanian » Wed 04 Apr 2007, 21:11:11

The graphs are misleading because the Y-axis does not start from zero.

[web]http://www.robelle.com/smugbook/stats.html[/web]
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby Kingcoal » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 08:09:31

We are peaking worldwide, surprise, surprise.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby MrMambo » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 08:56:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', 'T')he graphs are misleading because the Y-axis does not start from zero.


I disagree. How many data graphs starts from zero?

Since the graphs shows the numbers on the y-axis, any half-way intelligent person can read that this is a close in look. If you want to look in detail at changes you have to zoom in.

It could however be advicable to include additional graphs starting from zero to better show the change relative to the total.
User avatar
MrMambo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby aahala » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 12:20:07

I don't believe the accuracy of Figure 3, World production and demand.

It shows five straight years where consumption has out-stripped
production and by a good margin each year. The only way this
could possibly be correct is if there were very large, or should
I say, extremely large, stockpiles of oil already produced before
the first year of the chart.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby Yvan » Thu 05 Apr 2007, 20:22:45

Well the guy is obviously a chartist. Therefore his analysis is no better than cartomancy.
User avatar
Yvan
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon 03 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 04:42:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'I') generally agree with his conclusions but some of the charts on imports into the US appear to be off. For example, imports into the US from Canada have been increasing over the last year - but his chart shows otherwise.

The key thing on exports is that throughout 2005 and 2006, US crude imports were on a plateau of about 10 million barrels per day. It appears to be slipping towards 9.6 to 9.7 mbpd right now. When you consider that exports should increase as US consumption increases, and prodcution stagnates, you realize there is a serious problem coming down the line.


Dante, I do not understand your point? Sorry, maybe it is me?

Why should exports increase as US consumption increases?

US exports are rising as the US dollar weakens. The US may not export much to the eurozone, but USD and the EUR exports do compete with one another for customers in Asia.

Also, even though energy consumption is assumed to be inelastic, overtime we would expect high prices, relative to 1999-2001 for example, to impact total demand and therefore crude imports. The transport fuel component may be less elastic, but total demand includes those uses for petroleum products for which there are substitutes. Heating oil versus natural gas versus coal generated electricity for example.

I do not know, maybe I am just missing something? So if you can clarify it for me I would appreciate it. Thanks.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 04:58:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'h')ttp://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm


RE this link?

Which charts are everyone refering to? I found only individual stocks and not imports or exports? Or world production and demand? Which day of the week are the others on?

I did find this quote quite amusing.

CHRIS PUPLAVA wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
The United States has been dependent on foreign oil imports for years now as U.S. production has been in decline since the 1980s. Falling production and rising demand has led to an increased need for imports, with many of these imports coming from politically unstable regions. The two figures below explain the “dependent” subtitle to the article.


It is like, "no shit, Dick Tracey", you can say exactly the samething about China, Germany and Japan as well. The largest economies in the world and also the largest importers of oil! Talk about stating the obvious? ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby DantesPeak » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 08:20:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'I') generally agree with his conclusions but some of the charts on imports into the US appear to be off. For example, imports into the US from Canada have been increasing over the last year - but his chart shows otherwise.

The key thing on exports is that throughout 2005 and 2006, US crude imports were on a plateau of about 10 million barrels per day. It appears to be slipping towards 9.6 to 9.7 mbpd right now. When you consider that exports should increase as US consumption increases, and prodcution stagnates, you realize there is a serious problem coming down the line.


Dante, I do not understand your point? Sorry, maybe it is me?

Why should exports increase as US consumption increases?

US exports are rising as the US dollar weakens. The US may not export much to the eurozone, but USD and the EUR exports do compete with one another for customers in Asia.

Also, even though energy consumption is assumed to be inelastic, overtime we would expect high prices, relative to 1999-2001 for example, to impact total demand and therefore crude imports. The transport fuel component may be less elastic, but total demand includes those uses for petroleum products for which there are substitutes. Heating oil versus natural gas versus coal generated electricity for example.

I do not know, maybe I am just missing something? So if you can clarify it for me I would appreciate it. Thanks.


Sorry for the confusion. Left out a few words that distorted the meaning of what I was trying to say.

Where I said "exports should increase as US consumption increases", I meant to say that exports into the US from other countries should increase since total US oil and product demand is increasing and additional supplies are not available domestically.

However even as US demand is rising, crude imports into the US during 2007 have been falling. So US inventories are running down, and the US will have to bid more agressively to rebuild inventories. But at this time, with refinery problems, the US is not bidding agressively, and marginal available supplies are going to Europe, at least for now. I am not as familiar with Eurpoean markets as you are, but they appear to have been impacted by the recent French port strike.
Last edited by DantesPeak on Fri 06 Apr 2007, 08:24:51, edited 1 time in total.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby RdSnt » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 08:23:08

Well, it may be obvious to you MrBill, but to the majority of the population it isn't.
This site though doesn't service the general population, this is a conservative site and Chris is focused on making money. In this case he and the people viewing it are gold bugs, which in an uncharitable way means people waiting for disaster, to take advantage of it and makes pots of money.
He doesn't look at this with concern for the world, it's more a simple rational look at hard data and preparing to take advantage.
Now, morality aside, if this sort of information is being disseminated along conservative channels, perhaps some will respond positively and take some individual action to mitigate the worst we've all discussed here.
After all MrBill you must admit even the finest data you can come with is a guess at best, subject to tomorrows human responses. Which invalidates whatever you came up with today.
I'm not all that concerned about the fine accuracy of the charts, it's the general tone of the message that matters to me. The more people that have some warning, the more panic is mitigated. And panic is going to be the real killer here, not running out of things.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'h')ttp://www.financialsense.com/Market/wrapup.htm


RE this link?

Which charts are everyone refering to? I found only individual stocks and not imports or exports? Or world production and demand? Which day of the week are the others on?

I did find this quote quite amusing.

CHRIS PUPLAVA wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
The United States has been dependent on foreign oil imports for years now as U.S. production has been in decline since the 1980s. Falling production and rising demand has led to an increased need for imports, with many of these imports coming from politically unstable regions. The two figures below explain the “dependent” subtitle to the article.


It is like, "no shit, Dick Tracey", you can say exactly the samething about China, Germany and Japan as well. The largest economies in the world and also the largest importers of oil! Talk about stating the obvious? ; - )
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 08:29:39

Dantespeak wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever even as US demand is rising, crude imporst into the US during 2007 have been falling. So US inventories are running down, and the US will have to bid more agressively to rebuild inventories. But at this time, with refinery problems, the US is not bidding agressively, and marginal available supplies are going to Europe, at least for now. I am not as familiar with Eurpoean markets as you are, but they appear to have been impacted by the recent French port strike.


Actually, total demand in the USA has been surprisingly high for the past quarter. Disconcertingly strong. Last week's +1.4% yoy total demand increase was almost mild by comparison.

As I understand the situation in France that was actually also impacting gasoline exports to the USA as from each barrel of crude you get diesel and gasoline, and as Europe uses more diesel than gasoline they export quite a lot of surplus unleaded gasoline to the USA. That is just one reason that unleaded gasoline inventories have been falling 8-weeks in a row. Domestic refining problems are another.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Brent oil, the European benchmark crude
oil, traded at a record high premium to the U.S. benchmark, West
Texas Intermediate, as refinery problems in the U.S. cut demand for
its crude, helping to lower the price.
Seasonal maintenance and shutdowns at some refineries, such as Valero Energy Corp.'s fire-damaged McKee plant near Sunray, Texas, have built up a surplus of oil, some industry analysts said. Valero expects to partly resume operations at its McKee refinery in early to mid April, Bill Day, a company spokesman, said this week.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Brent premium to West Texas, which is priced in Cushing,
Oklahoma, rose as high as $4.48 a barrel today and was at $3.81 at 1:34 p.m. London time. West Texas traded at an average discount of 14.5 cents a barrel to Brent in the past 12 months
.
Increased Canadian crude supplies to the U.S. have been putting
pressure on West Texas prices, according to Ehsan Ul-Haq, the head of research at PVM Oil Associates GmbH in Vienna. At the same time, militant attacks in have disrupted the supply of Nigerian oil, which is priced relative to Brent, forcing Asian refiners to search
for more crude from Europe and propping up the price of Brent.


Source: April 5 (Bloomberg)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 08:48:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RdSnt', 'W')ell, it may be obvious to you MrBill, but to the majority of the population it isn't.
This site though doesn't service the general population, this is a conservative site and Chris is focused on making money. In this case he and the people viewing it are gold bugs, which in an uncharitable way means people waiting for disaster, to take advantage of it and makes pots of money.
He doesn't look at this with concern for the world, it's more a simple rational look at hard data and preparing to take advantage.
Now, morality aside, if this sort of information is being disseminated along conservative channels, perhaps some will respond positively and take some individual action to mitigate the worst we've all discussed here.
After all MrBill you must admit even the finest data you can come with is a guess at best, subject to tomorrows human responses. Which invalidates whatever you came up with today.
I'm not all that concerned about the fine accuracy of the charts, it's the general tone of the message that matters to me. The more people that have some warning, the more panic is mitigated. And panic is going to be the real killer here, not running out of things.


Well, I certainly think you have hit the nail right on the head. Thanks.

"Now, morality aside, if this sort of information is being disseminated along conservative channels, perhaps some will respond positively and take some individual action to mitigate the worst we've all discussed here."

Accurate data is essential for good public policy making. Or as it has often been quipped, 'garbage in = garbage out'.

What we then do with the data is another story. Some will use it to profit (someone has to, right?), while some will use it to mitigate negative effects (if they can).

I would argue, for example, that the last thing America or anywhere else at the moment needs right now is cheap energy. Look at how they are wasting it in any case? Cheaper energy would just lead to more waste. We need more expensive energy, so consumers of all stripes would finally get the message to conserve and change their lifestyles and habits.

However, in defence of long-term forecasts. What is the alternative? They may all turn out to be wrong, but if you have populations that are aging and you need to eventually pay pensions then you have to have some sort of forecast as to what the world will likely look like in say 20, 30 or 50-years.

The most important part of any forecast are the underlying assumptions that are being made. The red flags. Change the underlying assumptions and you change the final outcome. That is why forecasts have to be regularly updated everytime we get new and hopefully better information.

And balanced analysis! For God's sake we can all agree to disagree, but let's try to be objective about the facts. Distorting analysis to fit an agenda is the worst type of public disservice. Some of these blog sites make my stomach churn.

If I always, only present one side of an argument, and never admit the possibility that my previous statements might be wide of the mark then it is just academic dishonesty. Speaking of morality, if others are then using my one-sided rants to make investment decisions or prepare for The Next Great Depression, how ethical is that?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby RdSnt » Fri 06 Apr 2007, 10:06:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', ' ')Speaking of morality, if others are then using my one-sided rants to make investment decisions or prepare for The Next Great Depression, how ethical is that?


Well, I guess that depends on whether you've won or lost. For those who have scored big on your data, they will probably feel very moral :lol:

I can appreciate your desire for the most accurate data possible, and I appreciate you efforts to deliver what you have.
My feeling though is as the data reported becomes more accurate, the more specialized the language becomes (no matter what the field) and the fewer people are likely to understand that data. More importantly, fewer people are able to extrapolate to the implications suggested in the data.

I tend to have a realpolitik type outlook. Some information is better than none, if it's not pristine in its honesty and accuracy, provided it leans in the direction I would like to see it, then that's a good thing.

Telling the bald-faced truth to the general public about the near term implications of peak oil and global warming and what actually needs to be done about it, won't be rejected it simply won't be understood.

It would be like a thunder clap heard in your sleep. You might wake up and wonder if there was something going on then roll over and go back to sleep.
Until the tornado sweeps over your house 8O
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Good, current snapshot of US situation,

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 09 Apr 2007, 04:09:54

RdSnT wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')elling the bald-faced truth to the general public about the near term implications of peak oil and global warming and what actually needs to be done about it, won't be rejected it simply won't be understood.

It would be like a thunder clap heard in your sleep. You might wake up and wonder if there was something going on then roll over and go back to sleep.
Until the tornado sweeps over your house


Good analogy. No you're correct. It is better to be approximately right, then dead wrong with complete accuracy! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron