by steam_cannon » Sun 01 Apr 2007, 11:14:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mommy22', 'A') couple points on the corn syrup issue:
In my kid's school, milk with high fructose corn syrup is served at her school...really.
I hope it's just the strawberry or chocolate milk or vanilla milk (yes, my 8 year old says is now available). Why drink plain old white milk anyway?
Well, regular milk won't make kids all sugared up and bouncing off the wall... At least that is what the school administration should be thinking about. But most US schools are too disorganized to make sensible nutrition plans. I think the attitude is something like "If the kids want Pepsi, give em Pepsi, I only work here..." Corn syrup in milk, that's just awful!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mommy22', 'A') question I have, and I'm hoping someone can answer is:
In Europe, in their processed foods (including candy and soda I think) glucose is what's listed as the main sweetener. Does that have the same effect on the body as HFCS? Even Euro products produced in the us have HFCS as the sweetener (like Orangina soda).
Most articles point to High-Fructose Corn Syrup as being the most fattening of sugars. There are even some articles implicating it in being more effective in causing insulin resistance, including an article I mentioned earlier. But yeah most sweeteners in Europe not HFCS and IMO sweeteners sucrose and glucose are safer for regular consumption. But don't just take my word for it...
If you google for "corn syrup fattening"
To be fair, the most linked to article is an from 2004
Myth: High-Fructose Corn Syrup Is Especially Fattening
http://www.obesitymyths.com/myth6.2.htm
However this article refers to no animal studies and looks like propaganda rather then a clear scientific review.
The majority of newer and older articles point to HFCS as being fattening.
This quote from an article is a good example of comparing glucose and fructose.
"Sucrose is composed of glucose and fructose. When sugar is given to rats in high amounts, the rats develop multiple health problems, especially when the rats were deficient in certain nutrients, such as copper.
The researchers wanted to know whether it was the fructose or the glucose moiety that was causing the problems. So they repeated their studies with two groups of rats, one given high amounts of glucose and one given high amounts of fructose.
The glucose group was unaffected but the fructose group had disastrous results. The male rats did not reach adulthood. They had anemia, high cholesterol and heart hypertrophy-that means that their hearts enlarged until they exploded. They also had delayed testicular development. Dr. Field explains that fructose in combination with copper deficiency in the growing animal interferes with collagen production. (Copper deficiency, by the way, is widespread in America.) In a nutshell, the little bodies of the rats just fell apart. The females were not so affected, but they were unable to produce live young."
http://www.happyherbalist.com/index.asp ... ProdID=121
Getting back to the subject of cows. As Corn Syrup is implicated in weakening collagen, if you fed it to a young bull, I bet you could make some really tender veil!
But also if it is the practice to feed corn to cows, the cows may be weakened, live shorter lives and that translates to higher milk costs. Yeah, I made that connect!
