Texas,
Thanks so much. You cleared a lot up. One more thing if you or anyone else knows......
Considering this from
www.theoildrum.com :
From
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/2300 :
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')n update on the latest production numbers from the Energy Information Agency:
Monthly production records are unchanged:
All Liquids: the peak is still July 2006 at 85.47 mbpd, the year to date average production in 2006 (11 months) is 84.59 mbpd, up 0.01 mbpd from 2005.
Crude Oil + NGL: the peak date remains May 2005 at 82.08 mbpd, the year to date average production for 2006 (11 months) is 81.40 mbpd, down 0.03 mbpd from 2005 (11 months).
Crude Oil + Condensate: the peak date remains May 2005 at 74.15 mbpd, the year to date average production for 2006 (11 months) is 73.48 mbpd, down 0.09 mbpd from 2005 (11 months).
NGPL: the peak date remains February 2005 at 8.05 mbpd, the year to date average production for 2006 (11 months) is 7.92 mbpd, up 0.06 mbpd from 2005 (11 months).
Which of the above categories for considering peak oil would the oil derived from the TAR SANDS and OIL SHALE BE CONSIDERED?