Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Thunder Horse Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby Leanan » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 13:59:52

This is why I think Skrebowski and others who try to predict the peak by counting new projects coming online may be too optimistic. Unexpected project delays are all too common. You rarely see unexpected project accelerations.
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby Geko45 » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 14:18:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')ests over four months ``revealed metallurgical failure in components of the subsea system,'' which will now be retrieved and rebuilt, London-based BP said in a statement today.

That's what happens when you put all your eggs on one jacket.
Geko45 - Producer of Doomer Porn
User avatar
Geko45
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby nth » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 14:21:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'T')his is why I think Skrebowski and others who try to predict the peak by counting new projects coming online may be too optimistic. Unexpected project delays are all too common. You rarely see unexpected project accelerations.

This puzzles me. Skrebowski maybe too optimistic, but if it is just delay in project rather than lack of oil, then Campbell, Deffeyes et al are too pessimistic as there seems to be more oil in the ground than what they claim as they are claiming it is lack of oil on the ground causing PO and not inability to ramp up production fast enough. At least Deffeyes has stuck to his predictions, even though the odds seem to be he is off a few years at best, but the jury is still out. Campbell's number is dynamic due to ever changing URR, so it is hard to debate using his model.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby Leanan » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 14:29:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', ' ')This puzzles me. Skrebowski maybe too optimistic, but if it is just delay in project rather than lack of oil, then Campbell, Deffeyes et al are too pessimistic as there seems to be more oil in the ground than what they claim as they are claiming it is lack of oil on the ground causing PO and not inability to ramp up production fast enough.

I don't think you understand Deffeyes' work. I dunno about Campbell; I haven't read his stuff. But Deffeyes makes it very clear that what he is talking about when he says "peak oil" is peak production. How fast you can get it out of the ground.
Deffeyes believes that half the oil that ever existed is still in the ground. It's just that the second half is a lot harder to get out of the ground than the first half. Because the low-hanging fruit - the large, easy to find, easy to produce oil reserves - is picked first.
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 15:07:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('strider3700', 'O')r BP realizes that 250,000 barrels/day will be worth far more 3 years from now then tommorrow and in the long run it's best to take their time

Oh please... or the housing bubble pops in the US, sending the US into recession, sending the world into a recession along with it and possibly oil plummets in price. As if BP is going to sit on it.
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby DantesPeak » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 16:50:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', 'W')hatever the reason, the problems with Thunderhorse should temper the optimism about getting oil out of the ground in this "new" deepwater Gulf of Mexico find, 27k feet below.

Interesting that BP refused to estimate how much it would cost to fix Thunder Horse. Not frequently mentioned here also is the huge cost just to acquire the lease to drill in sections of the GOM. When all the costs are counted, will Thunder Horse be the first mega-project whose costs exceed expected income? Keep in mind, we don't what hurricanes will come in the future.

The new Lower Tertiary discovery zone is in the exact place where GOM winds will be the strongest - in a few recent hurricanes winds were aroung 170 MPH there. Funny how the subject of hurricane, and even possibly earthquake, damage never comes up when the bashing of 'peak oil pranksters' appears in the media.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby seahorse2 » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 17:02:48

Funny how Lynch the economist, who believes oil prices are determined by politics and economics, not geology, is predicting a return to the low $40s in oil, while at the same time Opec is saying they want oil above $60.

In the end, if Opec wants oil above $60, they can keep it there by reducing production. Lynch knows this, so his saying oil will go down the the $40s is complete bs. It just goes to show he too has an agenda, he's not playing with the facts.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby nth » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 17:29:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I') don't think you understand Deffeyes' work. I dunno about Campbell; I haven't read his stuff. But Deffeyes makes it very clear that what he is talking about when he says "peak oil" is peak production. How fast you can get it out of the ground.
Deffeyes believes that half the oil that ever existed is still in the ground. It's just that the second half is a lot harder to get out of the ground than the first half. Because the low-hanging fruit - the large, easy to find, easy to produce oil reserves - is picked first

I understand just fine, unless you are saying politics and natural disasters are also factored into his model, which from my understanding it is not.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby pup55 » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 20:30:45

Lesson: The bigger and more complicated the platform, the more vulnerable to a catastrophe like this.
I did some calculations one time on the Chinese rigs in the Bohai field, and the jist of it is that their strategy is: many more, much simpler operations. Less economically efficient in the short run, but maybe not in the long run.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby frankthetank » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 00:05:29

YUp...they should've thought of KISS before building this beast...

I guess they could make it into and artificial reef or something? Maybe turn it into high end condos?
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby Leanan » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 09:27:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'I') understand just fine, unless you are saying politics and natural disasters are also factored into his model, which from my understanding it is not.

It most certainly is. "Harder to get out of the ground" doesn't just mean geology. It also means weather, political problems, labor issues, etc. These have always been a part of the oil industry. They affected production during the first half of the oil age, and will affect it even more in the second half.
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: BP's Thunderhorse 140,000 bpd

Unread postby mekrob » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 09:55:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')oor Thunder Horse. Will it ever produce oil?

Given its location and structure, probably not. It will take two more years to get it underway and what are the chances that by then another hurricane doesn't come roaring through? Even if it lasts two years, it will have to continue to dodge hurricanes every year. You simply can't keep that up for a few decades.

I imagine that once they start losing assets in other countries due to nationalization, then they won't have the capital to continue idiotic adventures like this one and its plug will be pulled.
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby DantesPeak » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 11:53:53

Good technical story on Thunder Horse. Does anyone know if this hydrogen problem could also be creeping into other platforms?
Image
A manifold at BP's Thunder Horse oil and gas platform is deployed in this file photo. One of the four manifolds on the ocean floor failed, possibly the result of corrosion.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')ept. 19, 2006, Thunder Horse still in the stall Corrosion could slow startup of BP Gulf platform
Corrosion may be to blame for yet another problem for oil giant BP, this time a lengthy delay in the startup of its already overdue Thunder Horse platform in the Gulf of Mexico. The company said Monday a key piece of undersea production equipment, called a manifold, failed during testing, possibly the result of a kind of corrosion that made the steel brittle.

The company plans to retrieve all four manifolds — equipment resting on the ocean floor that helps control the flow of oil and natural gas from multiple wells — for tests onshore. While testing of the equipment is still ongoing, BP and FMC officials believe the failures may have been caused by a process called hydrogen embrittlement.

Hydrogen embrittlement, a kind of corrosion, occurs when hydrogen atoms, the smallest of all atoms, become embedded in the pores of metal, said Larry Spears, a chemistry professor at the University of Houston-Downtown. "If enough hydrogen accumulates in the holes or voids, it can exert great pressure and push out and create small holes," Spears said, reducing the strength of the steel. "You usually don't think of a gas being able to do that, but it can weaken it from within."

Detecting hydrogen embrittlement can be particularly difficult and often isn't discovered until after a piece of metal has failed, Spears said. The manifolds were being tested using seawater at the time of the failure, but BP said it believes the failure occurred because of hydrogen in the sea- water outside of the manifolds.

Chron
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby nth » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 12:35:26

DantesPeak, Good article. From other sources, I can confirm it is corrosion. Not maybe. As for what caused it, I cannot confirm that. The break/corrosion is at the welding joint, so could this mean bad welding? I am not an expert, so no idea. BP's Thunderhorse is in a mess. They are not able to pass any of their tests without finding out more problems. This is the nth time they had to fix or replace bad pipes.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Thunder Horse delayed....again

Unread postby nth » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 12:40:03

Leanan, You missed my point. Deffeyes claimed his 2005 date is driven by geology and that no matter how politics or resources play out- we will never be able to produce more.

Are you saying I misunderstood Deffeyes and that he is simply claiming from his modeling/view point that we have hit PO in 2005 due to politics, geology and other human led constraints? If that is the case, then it is news to me.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Atlantis, Thunder Horse Platforms Delayed Again

Unread postby DantesPeak » Tue 06 Feb 2007, 19:54:04

Image
Thunder Horse after hurricane damage

Image
Atlantis

Matt Simmons, among others, have been predicting a labor and equipment shortage that may stall the energy industry offshore.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')P Delays Atlantis, Thunder Horse Platforms Again(Update2)
By Stephen Voss and Maher Chmaytelli
Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) -- BP Plc, Europe's second-largest oil company, again delayed the start of production at the Atlantis and Thunder Horse platforms in the Gulf of Mexico, saying the postponements will crimp output this year and next. Atlantis will be running by the end of this year and Thunder Horse by the end of 2008, Chief Executive Officer-designate Tony Hayward told reporters today. Atlantis was originally scheduled to start last year and Thunder Horse in late 2005.

Competition for the skilled labor of oil service company workers is slowing the start-up, following earlier delays caused by storm damage and equipment failures. "The supply chain is stretched to breaking point,'' Hayward said at a press conference in London. "Thunder Horse will start up. It's just taking longer than we thought.''

The slowdowns will shave BP's 2007 production by 150,000 barrels a day and by 100,000 barrels a day a year later, Hayward said. The company today reported its lowest profit in two years because of declining output and falling energy prices. Before today, BP had said Atlantis would start in the second half of this year, with Thunder Horse beginning during the second half of 2008.

Atlantis, 44 percent owned by BHP Billiton Ltd., is planned to have the capacity to produce 200,000 barrels a day of oil and 170 million cubic feet a day of gas from 11 wells. Thunder Horse, designed to process 250,000 barrels of oil a day and 200 million standard cubic feet of gas per day, was originally damaged during Hurricane Dennis in July 2005, leaving it listing at a 20-degree angle. The platform is 25 percent owned by Exxon Mobil Corp.

Hayward named seven major projects that BP will start this year, including Atlantis and King Subsea in the Gulf of Mexico, Red Mango in Trinidad and the San Juan coal-bed methane expansion project in the U.S. The remaining three are in Angola; Greater Plutonio, Rosa and Kizomba A phase 2.
Last Updated: 6 Feb 2007
Bloomberg
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Atlantis, Thunder Horse Platforms Delayed Again

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 06 Feb 2007, 23:44:21

Poor Thunderhorse. So many questions:
a. Sounds pretty bad, which the viewers of PO.com were aware at the time. Were the stockholders informed of this appropriately at the time?

b. How sick would you be of paying interest/capital costs on this money to have this white elephant being worked on all the time, and not pumping oil?

c. If Gulf hurricanes are going to be more common, do we now budget in X number of months during the life of the project shut down due to hurricanes? If this is the case, does this effectively make some reserves off limits because it is too risky/expensive to get to them?

d. If you are building a new platform in the Gulf, in a place like the new field that was discovered last summer (which is directly in the historical path of the most severe hurricanes on record), do you build one humongous platform, like this one, or several smaller ones, like the Chinese do?
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Atlantis, Thunder Horse Platforms Delayed Again

Unread postby seldom_seen » Wed 07 Feb 2007, 00:56:51

If you will, let me tell you a story about a man named Jed; a poor mountaineer barely kept his family fed. Then one day he was shootin' at some food. When up from the ground come a bubblin' crude...oil, that is. Black gold. Texas tea. Those were the days.
When I see those massive oil platforms. I understand Simmon's point that oil is way underpriced. Imagine if we had to work that hard to get fresh water or coffee beans?
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Atlantis, Thunder Horse Platforms Delayed Again

Unread postby DantesPeak » Wed 07 Feb 2007, 13:37:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'P')oor Thunderhorse. So many questions:
a. Sounds pretty bad, which the viewers of PO.com were aware at the time. Were the stockholders informed of this appropriately at the time?
b. How sick would you be of paying interest/capital costs on this money to have this white elephant being worked on all the time, and not pumping oil?
c. If Gulf hurricanes are going to be more common, do we now budget in X number of months during the life of the project shut down due to hurricanes? If this is the case, does this effectively make some reserves off limits because it is too risky/expensive to get to them?
d. If you are building a new platform in the Gulf, in a place like the new field that was discovered last summer (which is directly in the historical path of the most severe hurricanes on record), do you build one humongous platform, like this one, or several smaller ones, like the Chinese do?

Good questions. Apparently relying on 21st technology is not always profitable, or so BP seems to admit:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ayward also said the start-up of Atlantis, another Gulf of Mexico project, is now due by the end of 2007. The company had previously said production was scheduled to start in the second half of the year. The platform's planned capacity is 200,000 barrels of oil and 180 million cubic feet of gas a day.
About Thunder Horse, Hayward said "it will happen." The project is now three years behind the original schedule. Thunder Horse is "something that hasn't been done before...We probably pushed the technology envelope a little bit too far," he added.

Hayward said the new guidance, more cautious than previously announced, was largely due to supply-chain issues, with the oil services sector now running at full tilt. "There was no new incident. It's just recognizing the reality of the industry today," he said.
Rigzone
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Atlantis, Thunder Horse Platforms Delayed Again

Unread postby seahorse2 » Wed 07 Feb 2007, 15:13:39

I like this quote about why Thunderhorse is not producing yet:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hunder Horse is "something that hasn't been done before...We probably pushed the technology envelope a little bit too far," he added.

If Thunderhorse pushed the envelope and thus, we aren't getting any oil yet, wait until they try to produce from the ultra deep water Jack discovery. It makes one wonder whether the new "JacK" discovery will ever amount to anything.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests