I am glad someone mentioned this book. The problem with the lot of the 911 arguments is, they would not stand up in a court of law. The main reason is because there is basically no evidence, it was either destroyed or with held. Michael Ruppert takes a different approach, he argues the things that can be proven, such as the actions of Dick Cheney. And according to him, he has a solid enough case to convict key members of the Bush administration for their part in 911, including Dick Cheney. Being an ex cop .. I am sure he knows a thing or 2 about building a case..
Now .. i love this video. In this video if you can challenge the authenticty of any of his sources he will give you $1000. A challenge for the 'debunkers' no doubt. Will you rise to the challenge or simply ignore the things you don't want to hear ?
[flash width=400 height=326]http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=8797525979024486145&hl=en-GB[/flash]