Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Gregorian Calendar

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sat 06 Jan 2007, 08:22:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '-') The global flood did happen.

Prove it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '-') A different orbit or a different angle of inclination?

A different orbit.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sat 06 Jan 2007, 12:34:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '[')url=http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org/evidence/lunarcycle.shtml]AWPrime do NOT click here.[/url]

Unless...
Taken from the same website above...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t is difficult to plot the exact course of the solar system. Some astronomers, including John Anderson at JPL, Professor Richard Muller at UC Berkeley, and Professors Daniel Whitmire and John Matese at the University of Louisiana, have speculated that our solar system might be part of a long cycle binary or multiple star system . In this case the Solar System would not just be traveling around the center of the galaxy but would have an intermediate orbit thereby affecting its angular direction. If so, we would like to know exactly where it is headed.

Those real astronomers are talking about binary systems with periods of millions of years.

Therefore they don't support BRI.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby greenworm » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 00:16:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')are to expand on this?


Not really, unless you have a question I can help you with.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 07:53:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')are to expand on this?


Not really, unless you have a question I can help you with.

I just can't translate it in logical english.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 17:46:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'T')hose real astronomers are talking about binary systems with periods of millions of years.

Therefore they don't support BRI.
Really?
So the authors of BRI put information on their website that does NOT support their theory?

Most people don’t see that it was taken out of context.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe you should contact BRI and let them know of their follies...you are so smart...and maybe you should take your refutations of my ideas and take it up with Walter who runs the BRI website?

Do you know what that Walter does and is? His normal job is investment banker and venture capitalist. BRI is limited to a website. And only one calculation is given.

You're so blind, because of your desires, that you follow a fraud.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby davep » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 18:04:39

Lunar cycles do not equate to a solar year. Why should they? Did the Jews invent this conspiracy?
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 20:29:20

Raphael, there are also male moon Gods and female sun Goddesses.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 20:54:23

But you are making an universal mythological argument, is it then too much to ask that it be consistent with other mythological systems?
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 21:27:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Raphael', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'B')ut you are making an universal mythological argument, is it then too much to ask that it be consistent with other mythological systems?

What is this universal myth statement I am making specifically and what consistency in my statement am I seeking?


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e use all the technology granted to us by the exploitation of fire, a gift from the gods...This science helped replace the Solar cycle that we were connected to. Science helped soften the harshness of the enivronment represented by the Goddess...

So yeah .... Jewish scripture essentiallty killed the Goddess linked to the MOON and its cycles.
She was replaced by the Sun/Son of God...and his representative...the MALE Temple Priest.

The problem is that this argument of yours doesn't count in every culture, it is therefore not consistent.

Some cultures didn't have moon goddesses to 'kill', or had moved to a sun calander long before the arrival of monotheism.


ps. Well check out that site of yours.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby greenworm » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 23:45:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') just can't translate it in logical english.


http://www.learnenglish.de/

There you go, if you are having trouble with the english language that will help you out.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 15:12:18

It seem that we are going to have to that that quote apart bit by bit:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f one were to use a moon calendar they would not use conventional time

A but fuzzy, but I can ask why?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1')2:60 which is the basic unit of a day

?? 12:60 ??

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 's')o we can't assume that 29.5 days is set in stone as the measurement. It is the assumed measurement.

What makes it assumed.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby greenworm » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 21:17:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') but fuzzy, but I can ask why?


In my best beavis and butthead voice, " you said fuzzy butt". :lol:
Time was invented based on angular measurements and these angular measurements are based on the sun's rotation and not the moon. If you were to base it off the moon, your reference point would change in relation to if it were done using the sun. Think, umm, noon is conceptially related to the sun because, the burning ball is straight above you as oppose to a 15 degree arc.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '?')? 12:60 ??


12 hours: 60 minutes. Last time I checked these were the units that time is measured in.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat makes it assumed.


Because you assume time is based on the angular measurements of the sun, which brings us right back to the first quote.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Gregorian Calendar

Postby AWPrime » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 07:25:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', 'T')ime was invented based on angular measurements and these angular measurements are based on the sun's rotation and not the moon. If you were to base it off the moon, your reference point would change in relation to if it were done using the sun. Think, umm, noon is conceptially related to the sun because, the burning ball is straight above you as oppose to a 15 degree arc.


A day is a day. No matter what you use to measure it. Therefore I don't see 29.5 days being incorrect.
Fighting technobabble and Woo Woos.

http://www.skepticwiki.org
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron