by JustinFrankl » Sat 30 Dec 2006, 14:21:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustinFrankl', 'I') would not classify all these groups as being "violent"
Look again. Every single group listed practices devastating violence, the reason I wouldn't want to live next door to any of them. I don't see any way to disagree with that, other than to believe that children are not humans.
I think I'm open minded and accepting of cultural differences, but yes within certain bounds -- specifically excluding violence. I'm perfectly willing to criticize violent behavior in any culture, and I don't want to live near it (both from self-preservation and distaste). If that makes me a hypocrite, so be it. If being pro-multiculturalism means being accepting of
all behavior, then I'm proud to say I'm not.
If you were to discuss "a violent earthquake", there would be an understanding of damage, death, and devastation. When using "violent" to describe human actions as in "a violent murder", there is an additional understanding of malice, ill-will, and hatred.
Many things humans do cause harm to each other, and to other living things, but not all of them are with the
intent to harm. Some tribal cultures may practice infanticide, but it is a method of population control, not for the intent of causing harm to children.
I find all the poll options offensive, though the Pol Pot branch only
wants to kill the intellectuals, so far no actual action has been taken. For any group I might belong to, whites, males, intellectuals, there are other members in my groups who want to harm members of other groups, and other groups who might want to harm me simply because of my group affiliation. But the desire alone is not sufficient for violence.
And the slavemasters, well I'm sure there are those who treated their slaves (slavery still being offensive in my book) better than I treat my dog, still not violent.
And are the jackbooted nazis marching up and down the streets at night and keeping me awake? Has anyone been threatened? No? Still not violent.
And I'm still not endorsing, recommending, or advocating any of the poll options. I still don't like what they represent. But they're not necessarily violent.
This kind of nitpicky defense of word-choice is not uncommon with INTPs. Would you have problems living next to an INTP?
Multiculturalism is a bad idea, supportable only while we're still awash in cheap energy. "Bland gick" indeed. Bland toxic gick.