Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby mercurygirl » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 13:24:16

Interesting. He really is a brilliant and charming person. I haven't read up on his church and specific beliefs, but it seems certain that he has internalized TEOTWAWKI and is pretty bitter about it, in his own way.

I wouldn't turn down lunch with him, or maybe a madcap tequila binge in Malibu.
:twisted:
mercurygirl
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby coyote » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 15:26:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ElijahJones', '"')Train up a child in the way he should go and he will not depart from it when he is old."

That is a famous proverb and probably more insightful sociologically than we usually give it credit. It is hard to overcome the attitudes handed to us by parents. It is hard to out live the pain they cause in our lives. It is hard to overestimate the value of the good they do for us.

True words, Elijah. So true, and so seldom acknowledged.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 18:36:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'A') friend who is Jewish said he would never go to see a Mel Gibson film. I forgot about all the controversy surrounding the Passion of the Christ. Even going to this new Mel Gibson movie can offend certain people. I guess the Maya are offended because none of the main characters are from the Mayan region. They are mostly Mexicans from around Veracruz where most of the movie was made. It's hard not to generate controversy when you make a movie like this.


Thats just stupid. A few angry Jews, a few angry Mexicans, with a free mass media megaphone for their personal causes provided by Rupert Murdoch in his quest for something for the talking heads to blather about.

Daniel Quinn would probably back me up in guessing that the controversy has more to do with the portrayal of a non-christian, non-capitalist, non-EarthRaping culture as one of peace and spiritual enlightenment.

Many modern cultural forces have lots to gain from co-opting the pure, vital symbolism evident in extinguished hunter-gatherer cultures for thier own purposes, as a post-modern extension of instinctual rape and pillage behavior. I think Gibson has made an artful film which does not exploit the legacy of people who have no place in Western historical canon. Doing so, he indirectly raises moral and ethical questions that cannot be answered from within western frames of reference without producing Catholic amounts of guilt and shame. Therefore, reactions are schizophrenic, sensational, moralistic. I think Mel's public crucifixion over the drunken incident is just another aspect of this.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby mercurygirl » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 20:13:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ElijahJones', 'H')mm, is it the money or the good looks, or the midnight jew bashing that attracts you the most?


Well, since you asked, I put some thought into it.

1. His opinions are his own, and I don't share them, but I like that he has them.
2. He has huge balls.
3. He's rebellious, tormented, and angry at times (if others aren't, they haven't been paying attention.)
4. His apparent sensitivity, the flip side of which is the drunken insensitivity after a poor attempt to anaesthetize the former.
5. One of the critical reviews called him "Mad Mel". As BW also alluded to, maybe he is a bit mad in the tradition of great artists (think Van Gogh). He is trying desparately to bring this vision out of himself and place it before us, to shine a bright light on it, as he thinks and hopes it is worthy. The strain must be enormous, so he must be tremendously strong, though fallible.
6. He recognizes his flaws.

Very attractive indeed.
mercurygirl
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby seahorse » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 20:22:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e has huge balls.


Really?

Refresh my memory everyone and give me the exact quote, please, of what Gibson told the officer. Then, I would like to know, briefly, what issues are taken with it.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Revi » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 20:53:19

I read two reviews of the movie where the reviewer had not even seen the movie and was panning it. I talked to a friend who had seen it and hated it. I respect his viewpoint much more than the critics who never saw the movie. I think a little controversy is good for a movie. This controversy has nothing to do with the actual movie, however. Gibson shouldn't have said and did any of the things he did. He should have let his movies speak for themselves. Sometimes celebrities get in the way of their own creations.

The movie is the best depiction of the classic Mayan period I have ever seen. That alone is reason enough to go see it. When the Mayan cities went down they were abandoned and not repopulated for 1000 years. Guatemala just exceeded the population that was there in Mayan times. It bodes badly for civilizations. When they fall they fall hard and fast. Rome did the same thing. Rome went down to a city of 40,000 from over a million in it's heyday. They were grazing cattle where the games were held. Some of the games are still being held. The Spanish bullfight is descended from the Roman games. I wonder if they will be holding Nascar a hundred years from now...
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Zardoz » Thu 21 Dec 2006, 21:09:39

Kenneth Turan's review in the L.A. Times:

Another bloodbath, Mel Gibson’s "Apocalypto" doesn’t miss an impalement or a dismemberment.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ho knows what violence lurks in the hearts of men? Mel Gibson knows, and he just can't resist putting every last ounce of it on screen. He also can't resist pulling those bloody, still-beating hearts out of human bodies and putting them up on screen as well. And that's just the beginning...

Despite a genuine talent for taking us to another time and place, a gift that under other circumstances would be worth experiencing, Gibson has made a movie that can be confidently recommended only to viewers who have a concentration camp commandant's tolerance for repugnant savagery.

Mountains of hacked up corpses, exit wounds spewing fountains of blood, spears shattering teeth, warriors literally beating each other's brains out, it's all here in living and dying color.

Perhaps even Gibson himself doesn't know what deep need is satisfied by putting this kind of brutality on screen. But no one who's seen the disemboweling scene in "Braveheart" or the torture and crucifixion in "The Passion of the Christ" (not to mention the Gibson parody on "South Park") can doubt that need is there...If ever there was a filmmaker congenitally unable to resist shots of severed heads bouncing, bouncing, bouncing down the side of a steep pyramid, this is the man...

...Gibson unblushingly intends "Apocalypto" as a clarion call warning modern man to watch his step or risk following the Mayas into decline and near-extinction. To this end he opens the story with a famous quote from historian Will Durant about the fall of Rome: "A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within."

This is all well and good, but the reality of "Apocalypto" is that this film is in fact Exhibit A of the rot from within that Gibson is worried about. If our society is in moral peril, the amount of stomach-turning violence that we think is just fine to put on screen is by any sane measure a major aspect of that decline. Mel, no one in your entourage is going to tell you this, but you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. A big part.

I haven't seen it yet, but I suppose I will eventually. I'll try to see it on an empty stomach.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Fri 22 Dec 2006, 17:54:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ho knows what violence lurks in the hearts of men? Mel Gibson knows, and he just can't resist putting every last ounce of it on screen. He also can't resist pulling those bloody, still-beating hearts out of human bodies and putting them up on screen as well. And that's just the beginning...


Even though Mel remains fully behind the scenes and invisible in the finished product, the reviewer evokes him over and over again.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Despite a genuine talent for taking us to another time and place, a gift that under other circumstances would be worth experiencing, Gibson has made a movie that can be confidently recommended only to viewers who have a concentration camp commandant's tolerance for repugnant savagery.


Writers alliterate to approximate the visual power of an artist. Parasitically, the writer needs to feed on an artist's vision. By evoking maleific imagery, he intends to glean for himself a sort of visceral power over the reader's mind. The difference from the movie director is that his imagery is wholly contrived from an original vision, and cannot be understood outside that context.

Jealousy commands him to condemn the movie, at the same time he recognizes that it is a success ("...talent for taking us to another time and place, a gift ...")

In other words, he is betraying his craft by putting his personal tastes ahead of his artistic judgement, reminiscent of the Victorian urge to paint fig leaves over the genitalia of renaissance art.

Its my conviction that 90% of professional movie reviewers are completely wothless.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Perhaps even Gibson himself doesn't know what deep need is satisfied by putting this kind of brutality on screen.


As wikipedia says, "citation needed..."

The film is no more grotesque than any painting by Heironymous Bosch...

A movie reviewer is many things... frustrated artist, would-be director, arbiter of social taste, and occassionally, armchair psychologist.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')But no one who's seen the disemboweling scene in "Braveheart" or the torture and crucifixion in "The Passion of the Christ" (not to mention the Gibson parody on "South Park") can doubt that need is there...If ever there was a filmmaker congenitally unable to resist shots of severed heads bouncing, bouncing, bouncing down the side of a steep pyramid, this is the man...


Here the reviewer begs the artist to resist his vision. This is the voice of the cultural norm, holding its fingers over our eyes, for our own protection. This man clearly covets the power of cinema. His orthodoxy is threatened by paganism, which is what Mel's film is, essentially.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')If our society is in moral peril, the amount of stomach-turning violence that we think is just fine to put on screen is by any sane measure a major aspect of that decline.

The interesting thing to me about the reviews is that they are largely black and white, 5 stars or 1 star. He is genius or psychopath. It speaks directly to his dynamism as an artist.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Revi » Fri 22 Dec 2006, 18:17:43

At least this reviewer saw the movie. I agree, it was gory. The reviewer is right, we like lots of blood and gore on the silver screen. It was the most popular movie in the country for a short while. Gladiator was a bloodbath too. You didn't hear any of this kind of review for it. A very similar movie, really. I don't think that this review will keep anyone from seeing the movie. If he wanted to kill the movie he would have called it insipid, or boring. It wasn't boring.

The thing is, that there is lots of blood and gore going on right now, in the real world. Every American is paying about $10 a week for it. It's called the Iraq war. They are doing it for us. We all need 3 gallons of petroleum a day. We pay people to get it for us. Everyone who flies once a month, lives in a gigantic house, and drives an SUV wants war. They just don't want to see it.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Sat 23 Dec 2006, 19:22:09

Well put.

Its interesting the extent to which the cultural hoi polloi recognize the gore, but not the grotesque.

Endless stories in the media about Jesus and Christmas with a considerable de-emphasis on the vagaries of the whole pain and suffering aspect.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby mercurygirl » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 01:46:17

I know it's old news now, but this just-read review is interesting and well done. I still haven't seen the film. :cry:

Apocalypto Review
mercurygirl
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Revi » Sun 07 Jan 2007, 18:08:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mercurygirl', 'I') know it's old news now, but this just-read review is interesting and well done. I still haven't seen the film. :cry:

Apocalypto Review


This is the best review by far I have read about the movie. I like what he has to say about Tainter's Collapse of Complex Societies. His review of the movie is right on. Here's what he says about the plot:

The Mayan city in the movie, a historically accurate composite of 26 very real Mayan cities known to have existed in the region of what is now Guatemala, is resplendent eye candy to the student of the culture. And to the observant social chronicler, this Mayan metropolis is also teetering on the edge of chaos. Almost none of this is depicted in the spoken dialogue of the movie, but it is quite apparent in the costumes and acting.



According to archaeologist Dr. Richard Hansen, an adviser to Mel Gibson on the movie and a scientist who has spent a career investigating the Mayan ruins of Central America, the early Mayans focused their civilization on attempting to understand time and the relationship between mortals and the gods. Late classic Mayan civilization took this basic societal mission and from it created an entrenched ruling class, concerned with maintaining its lifestyle and privileges. Over time, the Mayan quest for learning and the resulting civilization that previously evolved began to incorporate ritualistic elements of savagery, in the form of expeditionary warfare to validate the power of what we might today label as "the state." Thus, the basis of Mayan governance shifted to spectacles that could preoccupy, if not downright manipulate, the populace through some combination of awe, humiliation, and fear. (Greg's Note: Reminds me of going through passport control at Miami International Airport.)



The Gods Must Be Angry



Apparently, the construction of the massive religious works (the steep, four-sided pyramids that you usually see in cruise ship ads today) were a Mayan form of what we might label as "big government" bureaucracy. In erecting these edifices, the Mayans wrecked the regional environment. According to Dr. Hansen, the lime alone that was required to construct the massive temples and other public and religious works necessitated that entire forests be cut down and burned in kilns. By the time of the 16th century period depicted in the movie, forests had been denuded, and firewood and other fuel was in short supply. Agriculture was failing due to climatic stresses, rain was not falling as it had in the past, and disease was making its way through the populace. (One great killer may have been smallpox, brought to the New World courtesy of the European visitors. Of course, we are also discussing a time that was several centuries before the development or understanding of germ theory. And the New World had its own gifts for the visitors, such as syphilis.)



Naturally, the Mayan leadership cadre placed the blame for these civilization-spanning problems squarely on the populace, whose lack of compliance and orderliness had apparently led to the disfavor of the deities. According to the priests, who understood such things, the gods must have been angry. The solution, according to the Mayan leadership, was the almost daily offering of human sacrifice to appease the angry gods. And if the angry gods were not appeased, then at least the bulk of the populace was kept in line by the sight of human remains being tossed down the 365 steps (interesting number, huh?) that lined each side of the steep pyramid temples.



So the movie Apocalypto is more than just an action-packed, head-bashing, blood-and-guts chase film. Sure, Zero Wolf and his gang of merry men raid the village where Jaguar Paw dwells. There is a bunch of killing and hacking, and Jaguar Paw and friends get dragged off to the big city, to be used as sacrifice bait. On the trek to the Mayan equivalent of Gotham City (or is it Las Vegas, what with all the tall temples where people pray for good fortune?), Jaguar Paw sees the horrible environmental devastation that concentrated amounts of Mayan civilization has created and, contemplatively, wonders at it all. What a guy, huh? Our hero is about to become another piece of human sushi when things happen that only happen in the movies, and he comes down off the sacrificial altar. Jaguar Paw then escapes to the jungle, to head back to his village and find his wife and young son. There is a big chase scene through the jungle, complete with horrific wild animal attacks, and arrows and spears whizzing past the camera lens. There are guys jumping off of waterfalls into the torrent below, and there are booby traps that could give even the clever and adaptive minds behind the Iraqi insurgency some new ideas.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine
Top

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 15:23:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mercurygirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ElijahJones', 'H')mm, is it the money or the good looks, or the midnight jew bashing that attracts you the most?


Well, since you asked, I put some thought into it.

1. His opinions are his own, and I don't share them, but I like that he has them.
2. He has huge balls.
3. He's rebellious, tormented, and angry at times (if others aren't, they haven't been paying attention.)
4. His apparent sensitivity, the flip side of which is the drunken insensitivity after a poor attempt to anaesthetize the former.
5. One of the critical reviews called him "Mad Mel". As BW also alluded to, maybe he is a bit mad in the tradition of great artists (think Van Gogh). He is trying desparately to bring this vision out of himself and place it before us, to shine a bright light on it, as he thinks and hopes it is worthy. The strain must be enormous, so he must be tremendously strong, though fallible.
6. He recognizes his flaws.

Very attractive indeed.


Well said. The Mad Mel label is actually a huge compliment from an industry that creates entertainment by committee. For an artist to retain the degree of control that Gibson has managed, is a breathtaking achievement.

I just read a book by Toby Young about the trials and tribulations of trying to become a script writer in Hollywood. Pretty damned bleak. That anything meaningful or spiritual manages to squeeze through the corporate creative extruder is remarkable.

It speaks well for Mel. It also indicates a sea change in terms of public receptivity to the message of potential change. People are increasingly hungry for someone or something that will point them toward a new way of thinking, feeling and ultimately, doing.

Even though, like you , Mercury Girl, I don't agree with all of his opinions, I'd rather walk on the hallowed ground he creates than drift through the hollowed arid void created by most directors, producers.

I haven't seen it yet, so am just going on the reviews Iv'e read here.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Lokutus » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 16:12:28

I'm considered a bit of film snob by friends because of my tastes for foreign and indie films. A year ago I saw Malick's The New World and loved it. Mel's Apocalypto is another brilliant film about what so-called "civilization" does to people.

I too read the reviews by PC morons who hadn'r even seen the film.

Go see it. It's the best film of the year. You have to see it on the big screen.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Mon 08 Jan 2007, 19:24:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'I')'m considered a bit of film snob by friends because of my tastes for foreign and indie films. A year ago I saw Malick's The New World and loved it.


I have not seen Malick's New World, although I plan to remedy that soon.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Revi » Wed 10 Jan 2007, 05:28:45

I thought The New World was excellent. I was watching Nova yesterday and learned something new about the Maya. Their civilization lasted about 1000 years. Their population kept on growning and growing until it suddenly collapsed. There is evidence that they crashed from the peak and trees were growing on the temples within 40 years. Their population went from over 8 million to much less within a generation. That is really scary. I've been to the temples at Tikal. They are surrounded by jungle. There are other cities all over the Peten and in the Yucatan. Uninhabited now.

This bodes very badly for us. When things go down, they go down quickly. The peak of Mayan population was just before the crash, when they were running out of resources, and the cutting of trees to make lime to appease the rain gods was at it's peak as well. The rain gods weren't impressed. It got drier and drier as they cut the forest off. At a certain point nothing worked any more. The whole thing collapsed.

That could happen to us. No matter how many Nascar races we stage the gasoline won't come back. It could go down quickly. We might not escape the fate of the classic Maya. But there are still Mayans around. They didn't live in the big temple cities, but up in the highlands. In the Nova show they showed some of the priests from the highland village of Santiago Atitlan going to the newly discovered site of San Bartolemo to pray to those same gods that still help the corn grow even now.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby Doly » Wed 10 Jan 2007, 06:43:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I')
This bodes very badly for us. When things go down, they go down quickly.


Not always, but I agree that in our current circumstances, it does look likely that things will go down quickly.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Apocalypto; New movie on civilizations by Mel Gibson

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Wed 10 Jan 2007, 19:19:13

The New World was a great movie, if a bit over-pounded by Mallick's Mallet of Ponderousness. Beautiufl and moving.

In both films, the aspect of agriculture is centrally important to understanding the context and meaning of the character's lives and sense of purpose. Its telling to me that, to the people I saw it with, such visual cues were completely invisible.

The pathology of Westernism was perfectly illustrated in Smith as a man divided against himself.

"Guile, Envy, jealousy, hate... unknown to these people..." A sustainable society hit by the economic bomb, among others. The message is that capitalism is a disease, western values a kind of commicable syndrome.

The movie proves the tokenism of modern "Thanksgiving".
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Previous

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests