by MrBill » Fri 15 Dec 2006, 04:53:13
Mockba wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') still cannot get over how anglofones totally do not know and even less understand what is happening (been happening) in Quebec. Come on, Quebec was put under British rule over 2 centuries ago - plenty of time to figure out that things work differently in Quebec... When reffering to "the very elitist french white catholic culture of Quebec" are you talking about this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2mSJj3sMW0 (those not familiar with recent Molson commercials should first watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqUde5i4KbI )
Mockba, you know I respect most of your opinions, but on this issue I have to disagree. Maybe you just have not been 'a Canuck' long enough? ; - )
If we go back to pre-FLQ days, Montreal was Canada's largest and wealthiest city. After the Separatists came to power corporate Canada moved to Toronto, and it was only a matter of a few decades before Montreal declined in wealth and influence, while Toronto grew in stature. Yes, they shot themselves in the foot!
By the way, the biggest exodus was by the Jewish community. Of course, separatism will gain headway if more and more native English speakers leave the Province.
At the Battle on the Plains of Abraham the French were defeated. To this day I do not understand why the British decided to have two founding nations in Canada? Heck, the Scottish fought on both sides of the battle, and there were more Germans in Canada than French speakers? Canada screwed it up from the very beginning, and in pandering to the French have been messing it up ever since. Two founding nations? What about the Natives? ; -)
Multiculturalism under PET was invented in a backroom in the 1970s by a bunch of immigrants who were neither French or English. I was so happy when PET died. What a fucking asshole. He did more to damage Canada then any Prime Minister before or since.
I do not like the French in general. Not in Canada. Not in France. That is not to say I do not love France. What a country. It has everything. The food, the wine, the culture, the Atlantic and the Mediterranean, fertile farmland and the Alps. What France does not have is an Anglo-Saxen business culture or case law. And France has always suffered from super power envy. I find it ironical that France, under CdG, supported minority language rights in Canada, while repressing all regional languages in France. How do you say hypocritical in French?
Now, my step-father and step-brothers and sisters are French Catholic, and my best friend is from Montreal, so perhaps I should be careful what I say?
But Alberta and Ontario have paid and paid to keep Quebec in the union through equalization payments, and the only thanks we have ever gotten is to be spit in our face by Quebec separatists. I think it became very clear during the last referendum in the 90s that Canadians asked Quebec to stay. However, at the same time they said, stay, but under no better or no worse conditions than any other Province.
At heart, we are a very fair minded people. We are very generous, but we do not like to give special treatment to one group over another. So it was very clear that Quebec could stay or go, but we were not going to keep giving and giving with nothing to show for it. Either Quebec can accept that or not? I do not think it is my lack of understanding of Quebec? As a matter of fact, I said, if Quebec goes maybe we could give them Newfoundland as a going away present?
An aside (not directed at Mockba). For all you Conservative bashers in the crowd. The Liberal Party has been in power for 70 out of the last 100 years. How dare you try to blame the Conservatives for mistakes made and perpetrated by the Liberals.
In case some of you are interested you might actually read the NAFTA agreement, so you understand what is and what is not covered by it. And then you might do your homework and see Canada's trade balance both before and since NAFTA was implemented.
America screws Canada over even with bi-lateral agreements at their own whim. Without trade settlement mechanisms it would not only be soft wheat, hogs, beef and lumber, but anything else they felt like slapping punitive tariffs on. And NAFTA does not preclude exporting to other nations. It just so happens that the largest market in the world is on our doorstep. If it is such a bad deal for Canada why have not successive Liberal governments torn it up?
Water, not energy, is the biggest trade issue. And despite a bi-lateral agreement covering water issues between Canada and the USA several states are drawing from the Great Lakes Basin despite a ban on such withdrawls. Plus N. Dakota has been sending waste water north via the Red River into Manitoba despite protestations from Canada that it is contaminating Lake Winnipeg. So if you want to take your chances without NAFTA then just wait for a protectionist Congress to slap even more import surcharges and non-tariff barriers against Canadian exports. Maybe just to gain leverage on non-related issues?
p.s. a great youtube I am (not) Canadian video clip. Thanks.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.