Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 12 Dec 2006, 10:38:58

Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms by Rearranging DNA

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lew Rockwell', '[')b]Two courses

Consider two courses for synthetic biology. One is the current prevailing agenda to limit the size of human populations. Another is the prolongation of life. Let's consider the second use of synthetic biology first - to prolong the human life span. One way biologists could do this is to introduce into human fertilized ova the gene sequence for synthesis of an enzyme called gulonolactone oxidase (GLO), so that human offspring can continually synthesize vitamin C as most other mammals do.

This should be a priority among biologists since humans carry a dysfunctional gene for this enzyme, which disables the synthesis of vitamin C in the liver, making humans totally reliant upon paltry dietary doses of vitamin C to prevent scurvy. Surprisingly, there are only 142 published reports on GLO in the expansive and growing National Library of Medicine database. Biologists have demonstrated little interest in this topic.

Humans have been described as a mutant species because of their inability to produce vitamin C. Most mammals have the intact gene for GLO synthesis and produce generous daily amounts of the liver metabolite ascorbate (vitamin C), about 20 milligrams per pound of body weight (equivalent to 3200 milligrams for a 160-pound/70-kilogram human). The restoration of this missing hormone/vitamin was proposed by Irwin Stone in the 1970s to create "a new and more robust, longer-living, tough human sub-species." [Medical Hypotheses 5: 711–21, 1979]

Four enzymes are required for the conversion of blood sugar into ascorbate (vitamin C). Long ago in human history the gene that controls the fourth enzyme, gulonolactone oxidase, fell into disrepair. The injection of the GLO enzyme into guinea pigs, which suffer the same predicament as humans and cannot synthesize ascorbate, produces vitamin C. [Nutrition Reviews 1982 Oct; 40(10): 310–1] The effects of this mutation and vitamin deficiency are not solely limited to symptoms of overt scurvy (bleeding gums, sore joints, fatigue, poor wound healing). For example, without the provision of supplemental vitamin C, ~800 milligram human equivalent in a guinea pig, this animal will invariably develop cardiovascular disease and die prematurely.

The whole structure of the human GLO gene, which is similar in structure and origin to a gene in another species, has been disclosed by a computer-assisted search. Geneticists at Wakayama University in Japan know how to correct this genetic error.

Here is their description of the problem:

Only five exons (the protein coding DNA sequence of a gene), as compared to 12 exons constituting the functional rat GLO gene, remain in the human genome. A comparison of these exons with those of their functional counterparts in rats shows that there are two single nucleotide deletions (a nucleotide is a subunit of DNA as adenine, guanine, thymine, or cytosine), one triple nucleotide deletion, and one single nucleotide insertion in the human sequence. When compared in terms of codons (a specific sequence of three DNA bases within a gene), the human sequence has a deletion of a single amino acid, two stop codons, and two aberrant codons missing one nucleotide besides many amino acid substitutions. [Journal Nutrition Science Vitaminology 49: 315–19, 2003]

Furthermore, researchers at Kyoto University in Japan have successfully inserted the missing or dysfunctional GLO gene into fertilized eggs of scurvy-prone medaka fish, producing offspring that can synthesize vitamin C. [Biochemical Biophysical Research Communications 223: 650–53, 1996]

So why is there no priority among synthetic biologists to restore the major human biological flaw that has plagued mankind for centuries? The lack of expressed enthusiasm for the re-insertion of a functional GLO gene into the human genome goes unexplained. Maybe it’s because the loss of the GLO gene does not fit preconceived Darwinian theories, that mankind progressively evolved from lower species. This gene mutation would have made Homo sapiens less able to survive. Who really knows why this main concern hasn’t taken precedence within the ranks of synthetic biologists? It is believed the restoration of the GLO gene would prolong human life by many decades over and above current life expectancy. Possibly the prevailing agenda to control the size of the world’s human population would explain the absence of a GLO gene insertion project from the drawing boards of biologists.



Fascinating article.

Actually...pretty fascinating science. But I can already anticipate the tiresome, vaguely biblical neo-Luddite one-liner responses these kinds of articles elicit here on PO.com to the effect of "Man will destroy himself through his advanced science". LIke we've never heard that before.

Yet, can anyone think of an instance where Humans decided that potentially valuable knowledge or resources were better left unexplored (or left in the ground) due to possible adverse consequences?

The fact is, people can and will explore these things somehow, someway, somewhere whether it's private or military or done in another country where laws permit it. And the science of biosynthesis is potentially enormously valuable (as well as enormously dangerous). The challenge is to design some safe oversight of it to allow it to progress productively. You sure as hell cannot moralize against it and expect some sort of widespread compliance.

One can imagine a future, after the learning curve, after all the mistakes have been made, where true mastery of the discipline of DNA manipulation has been achieved. It would be a profoundly altered world.

That said, I've always suspected that the cure for the population bomb will take a cue from the calamitous 14th century (plaque).

I posted the selection above because I wasn't aware that other mammals synthesized their own Vitamin C, and that human beings have a defective gene for the production of this vitamin and so must find it in nutrition! That seems stunning to me because it flies in the face of standard Darwinian analysis. Hmmm...
Carlhole
 

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby Doly » Tue 12 Dec 2006, 10:49:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')Yet, can anyone think of an instance where Humans decided that potentially valuable knowledge or resources were better left unexplored (or left in the ground) due to possible adverse consequences?


Plenty. In fact, I can mention more cultures that will respect taboos, even long after the original reason for the taboo has been forgotten, than cultures that will, as a rule, disrespect them.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')I posted the selection above because I wasn't aware that other mammals synthesized their own Vitamin C, and that human beings have a defective gene for the production of this vitamin and so must find it in nutrition! That seems stunning to me because it flies in the face of standard Darwinian analysis. Hmmm...


No, it doesn't. Humans stopped synthesising vitamin C because there is more than enough of it in the usual diet. Vitamin C deficiency was identified in very specific groups (ie sailors) that could not have access to fresh fruit and veg, when human beings will naturally eat more than enough fresh fruit and veg for their vitamin C needs.

Darwinian selection means that if something is not used, it tends to atrophy. In our case, vitamin C synthesis.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby Carlhole » Tue 12 Dec 2006, 11:56:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')Yet, can anyone think of an instance where Humans decided that potentially valuable knowledge or resources were better left unexplored (or left in the ground) due to possible adverse consequences?


Plenty. In fact, I can mention more cultures that will respect taboos, even long after the original reason for the taboo has been forgotten, than cultures that will, as a rule, disrespect them.


The Jewish taboo about eating pork comes to mind, which was probably an early response to experience with the pork parasite Trichinella spiralis - a small part of humanity shunned pork as part of religious belief. Or the taboo about procreating with siblings and close relatives - that's widespread and ingrained but easy enough to understand given the inevitable and horrifying result. I wasn't really asking for examples of taboos, anyway.

But can you think of a time when people looked at some new and potentially very valuable knowledge or resource but decided to forego the opportunity?

The only thing that I can think of is the ancient Chinese decision to stop navigating and exploring the world outside the Middle Kingdom. But that decision really had more to do with China's internal politics at the time.

People will not simply forego a new science or resource simply because it presents something of a threat as well.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby katkinkate » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 02:22:31

And once they've solved the 'problem' of inhetero VitC synthesis, I vote the next project is to fix the gene/s that prevent human females from reabsorbing their mentrual fluid at the end of each mentrual cycle, so we can do away with periods once and for all. Only the great apes and one species of shrew actually menstruate. The rest of the mammalian sisterhood reabsorb the uterine lining and recycle the nutrients. That sounds so much more sensible.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby seldom_seen » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 02:48:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ossibly the prevailing agenda to control the size of the world’s human population would explain the absence of a GLO gene insertion project from the drawing boards of biologists.

Let me put down my crack bong, and sniff some glue. Ok, I think I see your point now Lew.

The agenda to control world population (even though the US just hit 300 million and ticking) is keeping biologists from inserting a gene in ourselves to synthesize vitamin C (even though I can walk three feet out my front door and eat some apples or berries most of the year). I think he's right?
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 14:41:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')ossibly the prevailing agenda to control the size of the world’s human population would explain the absence of a GLO gene insertion project from the drawing boards of biologists.

Let me put down my crack bong, and sniff some glue. Ok, I think I see your point now Lew.

The agenda to control world population (even though the US just hit 300 million and ticking) is keeping biologists from inserting a gene in ourselves to synthesize vitamin C (even though I can walk three feet out my front door and eat some apples or berries most of the year). I think he's right?

Are you cynical or what?
The longer consumer lives, the more money service provider will make. Most of this money will come towards the end of [as long as possible] consumer's life!
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 14:48:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '[')url=http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi55.html]Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms by Rearranging DNA[/url]

Carlhole,
I do not see any "synthetic life" via modyfying of existing DNA to minute extend. It is just already common GM life.
Will not help and will not harm from population perspective.
However GM sailor could come handy...
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Synthetic Biology: Creating New Life Forms

Unread postby Atlantean_Relic » Wed 13 Dec 2006, 16:38:49

If it could work, there are alot of traits that could be altered, fixed or deleted. I for one would like the ability to regenerate lost limbs and not scar heavily. Mammals lost that one somewhere.
Was a long and dark December
When the banks became cathedrals
And the fog
Became God
User avatar
Atlantean_Relic
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon 24 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North of Id, west of Oz, and infront of the damned rabbit


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests