by jupiters_release » Sun 10 Dec 2006, 04:02:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'J')upiter, very interesting essay there.
Since that time, we have seen a few developments that have done a world of good for preserving local musical traditions. One, inexpensive multitrack recording systems. Two, the internet. At this point, practically anyone with access to these technologies can get their music "on the air" and find an audience, whether large or small. Also, the global corporate music industry is doing a remarkable job of alienating its own audiences via intellectual property restrictions, lawsuits, and so on, thereby increasing the audience for locally produced music around the world.
Thus I am less worried about musical extinctions nowadays than in the days when the essay to which you refer was written.
Lomax is my hero and I spend all my time archiving undiscovered independent American music from 60's to present solely on my website and record label, but despite all my efforts it has little to do with culture itself which can only happen in real life with performance and participation within communities.
Internet and cheap digital recording techniques caused saturation of poorly produced soulless music, anyone can create music clicking a mouse on a computer. Despite the crap, I argue strong musical traditions are still very much alive but mostly among the older generations, people over 50 years old because the media companies have been peddling the musical equivalent of prozac at best or rat poison at worst on the radio and TV for most of my short lifetime, replacing culture with a degenerative commodity - all made possible with technology. Physical death doesn't matter without spiritual health. I'm racing to find as much cultural history I can before it'll all be lost again for good shortly here in the peak oil future, but its already been separated from the younger generations for whom die-off was an event in the past. Very few exceptions to this generalization.