Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Spreading Life

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 13:18:15

This is a bit of a split from the "If Astronomers Detected a Signal from an Alien Civilization". In it was said that practical FTL travel is impossible in our universe. I will assume for this thread that this will remain so.
Now we humans have the need to spread ourselves as far as possible. And maybe escape when the Earth/Sun goes bye bye for whatever reason. To do that I only see two options:

1. Seed ships - We make 'small' ships that will be sent out in every direction. When it finds a habitable planet it will grow and educate the human embryos into adults to colonize the planet. However I think this idea is too unreliable.

2. Mobile Planet – Creating artificial planets with moons that generate light. This is very slow, resource intensive and relies on having fusion technology or better. However it looks more reliable.

Any other ideas?
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 13:29:09

Might want to work on preserving the ability of THIS planet to support life before making it any kind of priority to take life offplanet. Other than that, I don't have a problem with people wanting to go into space. If you want to do that, I say, you should, as long as it doesn't impinge on someone else's desire to remain here on Earth and live under good conditions.

But there's good evidence living in space is not practical, or maybe even possible.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m ... 84303/pg_1
Ludi
 

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 13:40:05

Just see this discussion as seeking the best solution for what has to be done before the Sun turns into a red giant and burns us all.
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby Cobra_Strike » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 14:01:48

So long as we are not spreading ANY FORM of religion I do not see 'ark' style vessels as a bad idea...however its a better plan to stop messing up this planet (and forming the need for a new petri dish, or 4)

Even lacking FTL technology, there is some potential for very high speed craft...It does not matter if it takes 3000 years to make it to our near neighbors if no one is awake for the journey (sleeper ships).

Still, my vote is to not mess up what we have now.
We stand here, as the light of other days surrounds us.
"Hail the Dead"
Cobra_Strike
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Fri 06 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 14:27:14

Yeah, at the rate we're going with this planet, we'll make sure we won't be around by the time the Sun goes nova. I think more significant discussions would be about how to preserve the ability of the Earth to support human life, though that is much less keen and gee-whiz.

Why not concern yourself with actual problems instead of imaginary ones?
Ludi
 

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby Chuckmak » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 15:13:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Why not concern yourself with actual problems instead of imaginary ones?


*SMH* We talk about this same shit every day. Can we at least branch out sometimes? Don't make it like it's a bad thing, Ludi.
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby TheDude » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 17:48:54

You'll probably not get responses from the more informed people here who'd tell you that any kind of extraterrestrial ecosystem will fail within a decade or so, or that a ship travelling at high velocities would quickly corrode from impacts with hydrogen atoms, cosmic rays, what have you. They've butted heads over and over with the Cornucopians like Dezakin and are about as interested in this stuff as other over-done subjects like 9/11.
I love the idea of moving beyond Earth but suspect it'll be a job for robots - Mechs. People are very delicate in construction; look at our track record in space too - Apollos 1+13, plenty of near-disasters in orbit, Challenger+Columbia failures, heaps of rockets blowing up on the pad. Not for the timid, and a space colony could give out at the slightest mar - read about the fleck of paint that cracked a shuttle window once! We should stay put, reduce our numbers, take much better care of the planet, and keep researching topics like this on the side. It's not the solution to our woes.
Although you should also Google Panspermia for an even weirder idea, which is rather Invasion of the Body Snatchers-esque.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 18:46:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'Y')ou'll probably not get responses from the more informed people here who'd tell you that any kind of extraterrestrial ecosystem will fail within a decade or so

Yes if diversity is too low, that is why I have option 2.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'o')r that a ship travelling at high velocities would quickly corrode from impacts with hydrogen atoms, cosmic rays, what have you.

Option 2 saves the day again.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')reduce our numbers, take much better care of the planet, and keep researching topics like this on the side.

On the side...... that is this forum right?
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 19:08:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'N')ow we humans have the need to spread ourselves as far as possible.
You do know that tuberculosis bacteria have this exact conversation when their host ends up on a ventilator in the ICU?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 19:27:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'N')ow we humans have the need to spread ourselves as far as possible.
You do know that tuberculosis bacteria have this exact conversation when their host ends up on a ventilator in the ICU?

Yep, that is life.
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby rogerhb » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 19:34:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'J')ust see this discussion as seeking the best solution for what has to be done before the Sun turns into a red giant and burns us all.


Why "has to be done"?

Everything has a begining and an end. Same with the human race, same with the rest of life of earth. Get used to it.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby TheDude » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 20:18:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'o')r that a ship travelling at high velocities would quickly corrode from impacts with hydrogen atoms, cosmic rays, what have you.

Option 2 saves the day again.


Generation ships travelling far below C would still have to spend centuries being bombarded by radiation, and deal with degredation of their biosphere. Something along the lines of Arthur Clarke's Rama would be more robust since manned by automatons. It'll be a while before we're slapping together 50 mile long ships out at L1.
Were you inspired by Stephen Hawking saying we need to colonize extrasolar planets? Their was a quite lively post about that. Search the forums for Space Colonies and the like and you'll find plenty of good reads.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 21:36:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'Y')ep, that is life.
Ce n'est pa la vie. C'est la mort.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 28 Nov 2006, 04:22:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'G')eneration ships travelling far below C would still have to spend centuries being bombarded by radiation, and deal with degredation of their biosphere. Something along the lines of Arthur Clarke's Rama would be more robust since manned by automatons. It'll be a while before we're slapping together 50 mile long ships out at L1.
Were you inspired by Stephen Hawking saying we need to colonize extrasolar planets? Their was a quite lively post about that. Search the forums for Space Colonies and the like and you'll find plenty of good reads.


I do not contest, that robotic probes are better suited for space than humans, nevertheless it is not impossible for later to survive there sufficiently long.

Radiation concerns often expressed here are not well founded.
Most of cosmic radiation comes in form of charged particles, and those could be deflected from a spacecraft by means of magnetic or electrostatic fields.
Should a "cosmic ram jet propulsion system" proposed by R. Bussard be used to accellerate/decellerate spacecraft, than radiation deflection would be literally a by product of its normal function. BTW, few centuries of scientific progress at current rate would be needed to begin to think of putting it into practice.

Radiation would come to significant play (and could put an ultimate speed limit on travel) only at speeds close to speed of light.
Astronauts (and on board equipment) could suffer damage by blue shifted electromagnetic radiation.
However this would not be a limiting factor at 30 or even 50% of speed of light.

In no circumstances "going into space" would be an answer on overpopulation of Earth, however setting a colony in other stellar system should in principle be possible, as long as Earth like planet with liquid water, breathable atmosphere (means already harbouring some kind of life...) and bearable themperature/pressure range exists within few dosens of light years from us and there is no principle of engineering nature, which would prevent completion of interstellar travel.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Tue 28 Nov 2006, 14:55:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'o')r that a ship travelling at high velocities would quickly corrode from impacts with hydrogen atoms, cosmic rays, what have you.

Option 2 saves the day again.


Generation ships travelling far below C would still have to spend centuries being bombarded by radiation, and deal with degredation of their biosphere. Something along the lines of Arthur Clarke's Rama would be more robust since manned by automatons. It'll be a while before we're slapping together 50 mile long ships out at L1.

Option two isn't a Generation ship. Its a rogue planet that creates the needed gravity just by mass alone. Therefore its biosphere is as robust as Earths. Its light must be generated from its moon.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ere you inspired by Stephen Hawking saying we need to colonize extrasolar planets? Their was a quite lively post about that. Search the forums for Space Colonies and the like and you'll find plenty of good reads.

No, I wasn't inspired by Hawking. I been thinking about this for a long time.
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 28 Nov 2006, 15:40:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', '
')Option two isn't a Generation ship. Its a rogue planet that creates the needed gravity just by mass alone. Therefore its biosphere is as robust as Earths. Its light must be generated from its moon.

In this situation an option 2 is a plain nonsense.
Are you going to grab lets say Mars or Venus, convert it into habitable planet, fit giant rocket motors into it and fire it out into space?
Complete, total nonsense.
Btw, are you aware that Moon does not generate any light of its own?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o, I wasn't inspired by Hawking. I been thinking about this for a long time.

You are thinking too much. I does not do you any good.
I do not mean to insult, but you have to learn really a lot to run sensible conversation about this subject.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Tue 28 Nov 2006, 20:01:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', '
')Option two isn't a Generation ship. Its a rogue planet that creates the needed gravity just by mass alone. Therefore its biosphere is as robust as Earths. Its light must be generated from its moon.

In this situation an option 2 is a plain nonsense.
Are you going to grab lets say Mars or Venus, convert it into habitable planet, fit giant rocket motors into it and fire it out into space?

It is very possible, but I won't use any chemical rockets. Ion based would be better and it would take many generations just to leave the solar system.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')tw, are you aware that Moon does not generate any light of its own?

To bad that people don't read the OP good enough. The entire set up is artificial (moon and planet). And it assumes that we have fusion power to articifially create enough light from the moon.
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby rogerhb » Tue 28 Nov 2006, 20:25:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'A')nd it assumes that we have fusion power to articifially create enough light from the moon.


Nothing like assuming away all those irritating little problems, makes the theory stand up so much better. Or rather, it means it just belongs firmly in the fiction section.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Spreading Life

Unread postby AWPrime » Wed 29 Nov 2006, 07:01:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AWPrime', 'A')nd it assumes that we have fusion power to articifially create enough light from the moon.

Nothing like assuming away all those irritating little problems, makes the theory stand up so much better. Or rather, it means it just belongs firmly in the fiction section.

Heck without fusion power I don't think humanity will survive long enough to worry about the sun going red.
AWPrime
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu 07 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests