by Ingenuity_Gap » Fri 24 Nov 2006, 17:10:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TITAN', 'S')ince there now seems to be a serious attempt at building a working fusion reactor, the path has opened for plausible travel within the closest stars. It is only a matter of time before this technology is applied to space travel, I would say within the next 100 years or so.
Although "fusion" sounds like a big word it's actually worthless when talking about interstellar space travel.
Space travel is something totally different than what we are used to. To be more than Star Trek fantasy there are:
1. Energy requirements
To allow for a meaningful trip (during the lifetime of a human or less) to the nearest star (4.3 ly) the energy requirements are so huge, there is no way they can be overcome with our current or even near-future technology. We are still using ICE engines based on fossil fuels, for god's sake.
2. Propellant requirements
All current modes of space transportation are based on carrying the propellant necessary for propelling the spacecraft with the spacecraft.
Sending one school bus size payload past Alpha Centauri within 900 years (I know, it's almost a joke) would require:
Chemical engines (like the ones in the space shuttle) are completely useless. There is not enough matter in the entire universe to allow for that.
Fission 1 billion naval supertankers.
Fusion would require 1000 naval supertankers.
In the
best case (fictional antimatter engine at 100% efficiency) 10 railway tankers.
3. Technological breakthroughs
To go beyond the nearest stars we need a totally different type of propulsion, one that is capable of faster-than-light speeds, otherwise the time spent on a journey would be prohibitive. As we all know wormholes, warp drives, antigravity engines are still only science-fiction.
When you start to grasp the difficulty of the problem you calm down and come back to Earth quickly.
"The world is becoming too complex and too fast-paced to manage." - Thomas Homer-Dixon