Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that already)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that already)

Unread postby MD » Thu 16 Nov 2006, 13:14:08

Here's a nice article from an energy insider. He essentially claims the peak oil discussions have missed the point, which he redefines as "rate of conversion"

It sounds like he is a PO convert trying to sell the concept to his peers without having to appear tinfoiled.

link
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby bobcousins » Fri 17 Nov 2006, 14:23:35

I think often the headline name throws people off. We know "Peak Oil" means Peak Oil Production, but it is often construed to mean "Peak Cumulative Production". No matter how many times we say oil is not about to run out, that is the image that sticks in people's minds. They are debunking the wrong concept.

Also, the idea that production achieves a peak at all is counterintuitive to most people. If I have a jar of cookies, I eat 3 a day until it runs out. I don't start off eating one a week, peaking at 10 a day, then tailing off. I struggle to think of any everyday examples that exhibit such a peak, which makes if difficult to explain PO to people.

It's good to see some industry insiders grasping the fundamental theory, even if they don't realise it's the same thing as PO.
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby seahorse2 » Fri 17 Nov 2006, 15:27:15

Nice article. It is very similar to what Simmons says, if one reads Simmons closely. Simmons always talks about a peak coinciding with a peak in downstream infrastructure, hard to get oil, flow rates, lack of skilled people, etc.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby mekrob » Fri 17 Nov 2006, 15:44:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'I') think often the headline name throws people off. We know "Peak Oil" means Peak Oil Production, but it is often construed to mean "Peak Cumulative Production". No matter how many times we say oil is not about to run out, that is the image that sticks in people's minds. They are debunking the wrong concept.

Also, the idea that production achieves a peak at all is counterintuitive to most people. If I have a jar of cookies, I eat 3 a day until it runs out. I don't start off eating one a week, peaking at 10 a day, then tailing off. I struggle to think of any everyday examples that exhibit such a peak, which makes if difficult to explain PO to people.

It's good to see some industry insiders grasping the fundamental theory, even if they don't realise it's the same thing as PO.


Is it really that we, PO'ers, are just that smart?
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby pup55 » Fri 17 Nov 2006, 15:49:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur industry is perhaps “flat out” in terms of its abilities to add additional “low cost” supply. We may be at the peak rate of conversion reflected in increasing costs from the service providers and the squeezing of profitability for producers. In some areas, this increase in costs (and reduction in product prices) is reflected in margins of profitability being reduced to levels experienced in the 1990’s


This is a key point, I think. If there is a gap in the Mike Lynch/CERA theory it's that it makes the simplifying assumption that the price of oil will go up, but the cost of drilling infrastructure, etc. etc. will
either stay the same or at least not increase at the same rate. This would, in theory, cause new fields to open up as the price gap justifies the production from a business standpoint.

What this is suggesting is that at the current time, even though the oil price itself is nominally high, there have been enough cost increases and other issues that the overall margin and ROI may still not be sufficiently high to get this stuff out of the ground.

So you could anticipate a time when oil reached $200 per barrel but steel pipe is so expensive that it is still not worth it to drill the well.

It would be interesting to know the ratio of increased drilling costs to crude oil price, so you could model this for various fields and see what effect it has on nominal "reserves".
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby MD » Fri 17 Nov 2006, 15:52:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ur industry is perhaps “flat out” in terms of its abilities to add additional “low cost” supply. We may be at the peak rate of conversion reflected in increasing costs from the service providers and the squeezing of profitability for producers. In some areas, this increase in costs (and reduction in product prices) is reflected in margins of profitability being reduced to levels experienced in the 1990’s


This is a key point, I think. If there is a gap in the Mike Lynch/CERA theory it's that it makes the simplifying assumption that the price of oil will go up, but the cost of drilling infrastructure, etc. etc. will
either stay the same or at least not increase at the same rate. This would, in theory, cause new fields to open up as the price gap justifies the production from a business standpoint.

What this is suggesting is that at the current time, even though the oil price itself is nominally high, there have been enough cost increases and other issues that the overall margin and ROI may still not be sufficiently high to get this stuff out of the ground.

So you could anticipate a time when oil reached $200 per barrel but steel pipe is so expensive that it is still not worth it to drill the well.

It would be interesting to know the ratio of increased drilling costs to crude oil price, so you could model this for various fields and see what effect it has on nominal "reserves".


Ultimately this means the the base cost of energy is going to change permanently upwards, forcing different use patterns.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby MD » Fri 17 Nov 2006, 16:19:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '.')....
It would be interesting to know the ratio of increased drilling costs to crude oil price, so you could model this for various fields and see what effect it has on nominal "reserves".


It would be a significant metric. Same problem as always though, without transparent data.....
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball
Top

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby whereagles » Sat 18 Nov 2006, 08:37:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', '
')Also, the idea that production achieves a peak at all is counterintuitive to most people. If I have a jar of cookies, I eat 3 a day until it runs out. I don't start off eating one a week, peaking at 10 a day, then tailing off. I struggle to think of any everyday examples that exhibit such a peak, which makes if difficult to explain PO to people.


There's a simple way to explain oil production: squeezing a sponge.

At the beginning you don't need to do anything, as water comes out of it by itself.

At the middle you need to squeeze it a bit to get water out.

In the end you squeeze more and more to get less and less out.
User avatar
whereagles
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portugal
Top

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby pup55 » Sat 18 Nov 2006, 13:20:01

Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') steel steel Interest per
beams stainless $1,000,000 Day Rate Crude Oil

June 2005 132 152 $60,000 $53,581 46.65
August 2006 164 196 $80,000 $91,812 69
Price Increase 24% 29% 33% 71% 48%



Steel Cost

Interest Rates
Drilling Rig Day Rate

The crude oil figures came from the EIA.

To make a long story short, the cost of the things you need to drill for oil, namely steel, money and/or rental on a drilling rig, increased at roughly the same rate as the price of crude oil between June of '05 and August of '06.

In fact, if you use the current oil price instead of the August oil price (69$) the price of oil has not gone up as much as the price of most of these other things. Note: this does not include any increased labor costs since that time, nor does it include any increases in fuel costs.

According to Rigzone, this has not kept anybody from trying to drill anyway (rig utilization is at about 87%) because if you can drill a hole now, and pump oil later for a higher price, you are still good.

Otherwise, if the oil price and the cost of drilling the oil both increase at the same rate, for a field of a given size, the rate of return does not change, However, it becomes more and more difficult to talk the bank into loaning you the money because of the increased project size, etc.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby bobcousins » Sat 18 Nov 2006, 16:53:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'I') think often the headline name throws people off. We know "Peak Oil" means Peak Oil Production, but it is often construed to mean "Peak Cumulative Production". No matter how many times we say oil is not about to run out, that is the image that sticks in people's minds. They are debunking the wrong concept.

Also, the idea that production achieves a peak at all is counterintuitive to most people. If I have a jar of cookies, I eat 3 a day until it runs out. I don't start off eating one a week, peaking at 10 a day, then tailing off. I struggle to think of any everyday examples that exhibit such a peak, which makes if difficult to explain PO to people.

It's good to see some industry insiders grasping the fundamental theory, even if they don't realise it's the same thing as PO.
Of course oil is running out. It has been under the ground for 60-200 millions years and in a scant 150 years we have sucked out and burned half.


Do you ever actually think before posting, or do you just have a selection of idiot statements ready to cut and paste?

Your definition of "about to run out" differs from the rest of the planet.
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult
Top

Re: Peak Oil is now Rate of Conversion(but we knew that alre

Unread postby grink1tt3n » Sat 18 Nov 2006, 19:47:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', '
')Do you ever actually think before posting, or do you just have a selection of idiot statements ready to cut and paste?

Your definition of "about to run out" differs from the rest of the planet.


To put my spin on it. IF we are at peak (in 2005 or 2006), then yes, we would still have half the oil avaiable to pump out. However, that availability comes with a few caveats.

1. Demand is increasing. China, India, ME. et al. Even worse, is the fact that the world economy runs on growth and therefore requires increasing amounts of energy.

2. As we pump more oil out of the ground, it is more difficult and slower to extract. Look at Cantarell.

3. Remaining untapped oil reserves are, to my knowledge, expensive and difficult to get to (i.e., oil sands and deep drilling).

So perhaps oil is not running out, but the free-energy ride we've been coasting on for the last hundred years may soon be coming to an end. The fact that oil exists out there in the ground doesn't mean it's trivial to get into a barrel.

Keep in mind that the infrastructure of the world, America in particular, has been built-up according to cheap energy. For the past 5 years there's been a surge of suburbia development in America. If cheap oil ends, how are those communities supposed to work?

Reconstruction takes energy and investment, and no one seems to be preparing for the energy power-down.

Yes, the petrol stations will be open tomorrow, a year from now, etc. However, do we still have enough time to wriggle out of this energy addiction? That particular hourglass may indeed be quickly running out.
User avatar
grink1tt3n
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat 28 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Southern California
Top


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron