Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Hemp Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby greenworm » Sun 30 Jul 2006, 20:45:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think it would be a really good commodity for the USA to have?


I am in agreement. One acre could produce the amount of paper 4 acres of trees could create. This seems to be a no brainer for me. I am not sure how it compares to cotton, but cotton is pesticide intensive (I have only read this, so don't quote me), so if this can be replaced, all the better. I did the math at one time to see if the US car fleet could be replaced by electric/biodiesel using this crop and I calculated that it would take roughly 8 Rhode Islands to do this which is doable, but unfortunately massive grid upgrades and investment would be needed to get this done, plus, population growth is going negate this eventually. Ralph Nader supports Industrial hemp, but try getting the sheeple to vote for somebody other than a repocrat.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Hemp for Victory

Postby dutchcyclist » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 06:10:40

Because hemp produces both fibre and seeds that you can eat and use for biofuel it is a very interesting crop. It is a shame that it is not grown in the USA. But it is not the single solution to Peak Oil, altough it might be part of the solution. The strange thing with the ban on hemp in the USA is this:
- The governement forbids hemp because they fear the THC-rich variety will be grown.
- Potheads advocate growing commercial hemp (the fibre/seed variety) because they think it will be good for their goal.

But the truth is this:

- The male pollen released by commercial hemp will screw up the product of THC-rich hemp (the drug variety) in a 10 mile radius.
So growing commercial hemp will actually prevent the growing of the drug-variety.
That makes the potheads advocating commercial hemp looking pretty stupid doesn't it?
User avatar
dutchcyclist
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun 30 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Groningen, netherlands

Re: Hemp for Victory

Postby Doly » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 06:31:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dutchcyclist', '
')- The male pollen released by commercial hemp will screw up the product of THC-rich hemp (the drug variety) in a 10 mile radius.
So growing commercial hemp will actually prevent the growing of the drug-variety.


Not 100% accurate. What will happen is that the product will be less rich in THC. So it doesn't guarantee that drug growing would disappear.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Hemp for Victory

Postby dutchcyclist » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 07:49:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '
')Not 100% accurate. What will happen is that the product will be less rich in THC. So it doesn't guarantee that drug growing would disappear.


It will not only decrease the THC level, but also the seeds will need to be removed, wich is very labour-intensive... all in all it doesnt guarantee 100 % prevention of drug-growing but it will make sure that legalizing commercial hemp will not turn into a potheads bonanza. Commercial hemp is grown in various European countries without it leading to any more drug hemp growing.
User avatar
dutchcyclist
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun 30 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Groningen, netherlands

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby Pops » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 12:37:27

I guess my point is to look at this from an economic perspective vis a vie the current investment and infrastructure.

Georgia Pacific alone owns almost 5 million acres of timberland, not to mention I’d guess, billions of dollars worth of timber related equipment and facilities

Here is the fiber part of wikipedia article on hemp (my emphasis):
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he use of hemp for fibre production has declined sharply over the last two centuries,...

... as other coarse-fibre plants were more widely grown, hemp fibre was replaced in most roles. Manila yielded better rope. Burlap, made from jute, took over the sacking market. The paper industry began using wood pulp. The carpet industry switched over to wool, sisal, and jute, then nylon. Netting and webbing applications were taken over by cotton and synthetics.

Hemp rope is notorious for breaking due to rot....
Hemp rope was phased out when Manila, which does not require tarring, became available.


Again, in all those industries huge investments were made in what I assume were better alternatives (although most have been replaced by synthetics now)

Of course jute, sisal and manila don’t have the cache of hemp, nor does soy which is a better protein source and a legume to boot (is hemp? I don’t know)

I would guess that at some point hemp may come into production in the US for specific uses, as will jute, flax, rapeseed, etc, but in my mind, converting millions of acres to hemp monoculture doesn't seem any more sustainable than the current millions in corn.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby PrairieMule » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 12:59:04

Hawiian hemp.

Hmmm. Maybe we could just light up and "float" to work?

Seriously, even in a energy crunch it will never get legalized. The Glaxo-Smith Klein lobby will never allow anything to infringe on future dicoveries that Paxil CR can be used to make Paper or durable synthetic rappelling ropes..

On the flip side, in a energy crisis it will be nearly impossible to enforce.

Have groovy day.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby greenworm » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 14:14:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'c')onverting millions of acres to hemp monoculture doesn't seem any more sustainable than the current millions in corn.


This is debatable. Corn requires pesticides, which hemp does not. Corn takes way more out of the soil than hemp does. With the right harvesting techniques you would need to add very little to the soil whereas corn is a huge nitrogen feeder. Why not grow 3 crops per year instead of what corn allows. Actually, it doesn't sound debatable at all. :lol:
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby Pops » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 14:42:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', 'A')ctually, it doesn't sound debatable at all. :lol:


http://www.answers.com/hemp&r=67
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his sort of crop is frequently cultivated on the same piece of ground for a great number of years, without any other kind intervening; but, in such cases, manure must be applied with almost every crop, in pretty large proportions, to prevent the exhaustion that must otherwise take place. It may be sown after most sorts of grain crops, especially where the land possesses sufficient fertility, and is in a proper state of tillage.



Purdue
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Hemp tends to exhaust the soil of nutrients. Some nutrients are returned to the soil after plants are harvested. On medium fertile soils a dressing of farm manure or a green-manure crop should be added and turned under. Chalk, potash, or gypsum may be applied to the soil to add the needed nutrition. Sodium nitrate and ammonium along with potassium sulfate have a beneficial effect on the fiber crop.


IOW, there is no free lunch.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby greenworm » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 14:46:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')emp tends to exhaust the soil of nutrients.


All plants do this essentially except for legumes which return nitrogen to the soil. I'll take my free lunch back. :razz: We are comparing it to corn. 1/4 the nutrients, 4 times the biomass. Enough said.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby nwildmand » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 16:41:59

disclaimer= im no expert

it depends on what your farming it for, if you use it as a seed crop it will deplete the soil as fast as anything else. if your using it for a fiber crop, and properly dry ret it most of the nutrient are returned back to the ground as the fiber is made up of mostly carbon hydrogen and oxygen. all the nitrogen phosphorus and potasuim rots off the stalk.

i tried to find a good link to back up my claim but it seems to be to buried in all the other pot literature. sorry

one good thing about peak oil, no more pot helicopters flying around with fuel at 10$ gallon. the economics of dope will be interesting. it will surley give the local farmer an edge when it just costs to much to move it. on the other hand with the country folk likley to be taking more care of themselves without the LEOs having an abundant fuel supply to harrass the potheads.

tell me what an energy sink the war on pot has been.[spoil]
Last edited by nwildmand on Mon 31 Jul 2006, 17:00:09, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby greenworm » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 16:56:18

Actually, if you are harvesting only seeds using a threshing method while returning the rest of it to the soil, this would be really good for the soil. Another PO mentioned that the stalk would need to be broken down as microbes cannot adequately break down the stalk due to it being too woody.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby nwildmand » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 17:07:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', 'A')ctually, if you are harvesting only seeds using a threshing method while returning the rest of it to the soil, this would be really good for the soil. Another PO mentioned that the stalk would need to be broken down as microbes cannot adequately break down the stalk due to it being too woody.


i guess we can agree that baling it up wet for a biomass feedstock would be the absolute worst thing. so no ethanol from weed.

i still believe the seed contains much more NPK that the stalk.
i was searching around more and it is too hard to find good information on the chemical structres of the seed and stalk. the only thing the goverment or anybody else cares about is the flower.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby Pops » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 18:05:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', 'A')ll plants do this essentially except for legumes which return nitrogen to the soil.


Which is why I pointed out the value of soyoil.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', 'I')'ll take my free lunch back. :razz: We are comparing it to corn.

Certainly corn, even if a net positive, is a bad boy, again of course we have the problem of billions invested – and more billions being invested in ethanol as we speak. A problem that has yet to be discussed in this thread. :razz: back at ya :)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('greenworm', '1')/4 the nutrients, 4 times the biomass. Enough said.

Well maybe easily enough said - I was looking for those stats but didn’t google anything right off the bat. Do you have a non-hemp promoting link? I’d be interested to read something at least somewhat impartial.

Really, I do think there is value to hemp and it should be promoted. But I am also pointing out that like so many idolized solutions, hemp isn’t the silver bullet described in the PR - otherwise it would not have been replaced way before the shorthairs thought it was making the longhairs crazy– the more one promotes it in isolation the less I think it’s credibility.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby nwildmand » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 18:45:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ')
Well maybe easily enough said - I was looking for those stats but didn’t google anything right off the bat. Do you have a non-hemp promoting link? I’d be interested to read something at least somewhat impartial.


its really hard to find good nonpartisan information reguarding hemp. most of it is from prohemp or dea circles.

here is as close as i could come, its from my local university.
http://www.lib.ndsu.nodak.edu/research/ ... plinks.php
http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_v ... ftype=.pdf

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ')Really, I do think there is value to hemp and it should be promoted. But I am also pointing out that like so many idolized solutions, hemp isn’t the silver bullet described in the PR - otherwise it would not have been replaced way before the shorthairs thought it was making the longhairs crazy– the more one promotes it in isolation the less I think it’s credibility.


of course its not a silver bullet but in our current energy crisis we should look at everything.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby Pops » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 18:59:23

Thanks for the links, I will check them out!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nwildmand', '
')of course its not a silver bullet but in our current energy crisis we should look at everything.


Yes, my point exactly and the reason I usually jump on threads titled,
Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

(not sure what "would it!!!!!" means but I assume there was a little short term attention blip in there while typing or maybe I've simply become out of touch and don’t jive text-message-english)
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby greenworm » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 22:48:31

I don't have a link, but I do remember that this was studied in Canada and that is where I retrieved the info. I also remember that the seeds are comprised of 38% oil. I am with you on the soy, in fact if the two crops were combined in an interplanting style and both could be harvested without detriment to other then we are kickin some serious ass! That is provided hemp provides a high eroei, which nobody seems to know, how frustrating. I have seen soy quoted as 3.2, that seems kind of high to me, I've grown it before and although she is an oily sucker, there just isn't enough of her. Can anyone confirm this?
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Industrial Hemp would it !!!!!

Postby greenworm » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 22:59:14

200 gallons per acre for soy. 1000 gallons per acre for hemp.

soy link

But once again, the hemp numbers are based on hearsay and no actual data from a study. The 1000 gallons is however quoted a lot, but I'd rather see some actual studies before believing it.
User avatar
greenworm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Fri 27 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Hemp for Victory

Postby JEMASCOLA » Tue 01 Aug 2006, 14:36:26

I like the idea of hemp. Not only does it provide energy, but also oil, clothes, food, plastics, etc. It's wonderful! But those government jackasses won't let us grow it legally :(. Another possible plant with a fairly high yield is switchgrass. And Brazil grows sugarcane, which also has a relatively decent yield. Unfortunately, sugarcane can't grow here.
JEMASCOLA
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: United States

Re: Hemp for Victory

Postby katkinkate » Wed 02 Aug 2006, 04:37:10

I'd like to get hold of a few industrial hemp seeds for later. When TSHTF and I've got my bit of land out in the bush, there won't be the resources to maintain a watch on ilicit agricultural activity and I will be able to build up a stock of industrial hemp for trade.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Marijuana Hemp Fuels to solve foreign dependence.

Postby The_Toecutter » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 04:22:08

Speaking of CraigX, check this link out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKZT9js4FfY

Small world.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests