by peaker_2005 » Sun 29 Oct 2006, 01:37:33
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('WildRose', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'A') few years ago, some big pharma representative was bragging about the increase in Ritalin usage in schools. He boldly declared "By 2020, we will have achieved 50% market penetration." Knowing what I know about administering psychotropic drugs, and Ritalin in particular, to developing brains, I was honestly scared for the first time since I was a child.
Treating the symptoms a lot of kids have with drugs such as Ritalin is a big part of the problem. What happens after a few years is that the kids end up on a cocktail of pharmaceuticals to control their behavioral issues and the child becomes an adult who is truly screwed up. Usually, the child's problems have been diagnosed when they're 6 to 12 years old approximately, and the school is often the institution that recommends testing. The kid may be having trouble concentrating, for example, or be unable to sit still, may have disruptive behavior in class. A kid may be tested simply because the marks on their exams aren't impressive. The thing is, it seems that finding a label for the kid's problems and then finding medication to put him or her on, so that the kid can then fit into what really is quite a rigid education system, is the general course of action. A number of times I have found myself seriously doubting the competence of the people doing the testing at the educational level. Do you know that the number of children who are suspected of having attention/concentration disorders by their teachers and parents is huge compared to the number who actually are diagnosed by psychologists with these disorders? It's true, and quite often what appears as ADHD is often just immaturity that they will naturally outgrow given the time to do so.
I have seen this over and over again in schools, had this experience myself with one of my own children, and have talked to foster parents (really decent ones) who are trying to deal with over-medicated kids. In the hospital setting (where I work), typically what happens is a kid is admitted because they're having problems in school or at home, they're on 2 or 3 or more medications, the medications are adjusted a bit, and because of bed constraints at the hospital they're sent home quickly. Usually, their behavior is quite ideal in the hospital (because they don't have to deal with the stressors they have at home and school, whatever they might be). But when they go on a weekend pass or are discharged home, the trouble starts again. I can't help but think that the actual causes of the problems aren't dealt with; they're simply buried with the medication.
I definitely agree with the poster who said that preparation for life issues through school courses, etc. might help a lot of kids and young adults. Also, preparation for parenting would probably reduce the number of kids who go on to develop problems that are treated with medication, especially ones who are said to have "oppositional defiant disorder". Strong parenting skills alone would go a long way towards treating these kids, or actually may even prevent them from ever being diagnosed as such.
I don't go along with testing everyone, especially at an early age (preschool, as suggested in the article). That's crazy. People develop at such different rates, and I don't trust all of those professionals who are doing the assessments.
When diagnosed *correctly* and not just diagnosed with these conditionj because they want to say they diagnosed something, a fair bit of good can result - I'm living proof that the stuff actually DOES WORK - IN THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCES.
I'm in Australia, but the possibility of national mental health screening gives me mixed feelings. On one hand, there is a problem - and it DOES need to be addressed.
On the other hand, this sounds like a surefire way to condemn people the government doesn't like. Even if it doesn't start out that way it could quite easily end that way.
Then again, I was diagnosed by people whom I *know* are knowledgable in this field.