by Zardoz » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 16:12:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '.')..I was confronted this morning with a news story about schools implementing changes in their policies regarding physical games kids play. Their idea was to eliminate "competition" based games in favor of activities which don't foster competition... no winners or losers...
Huh? Where did that come from? I'd like to see that story. It must have been about some very obscure, new age, "alternative" school or something. It sure couldn't have been any sort of mainstream school.
Competitive sports for school-age kids, from preschool through college, are bigger than ever. It's a titanic industry that gets more huge every year. We're more competitive than we've ever been. If anything, we take winning and losing more seriously now than we ever have.
Hell, high-school-age kids are risking their health for the sake of getting a competitive edge. Steroids, human growth hormone, and other performance-enhancing substances are gulped and shot by the ton. We'll do anything to win.
Aaron, you have to be aware of the status of High School football in Texas, right? You must know it's a virtual religion.
And if we're not competitive, how do you explain all those sports channels on TV? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe they're all about "competition". There are very few blocks of time allocated to non-competitive activities.
Try this: Google "U.S. youth sports leagues" or "U.S. youth sports organizations", and start following some links. You think that's not about winning and losing? You think they're playing for fun? A small percentage of the participants might be, but that's not what it's all about, is it?