Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Oil Market

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Is the oil market effecient?

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 05 May 2006, 11:09:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'M')r. Bill you almost have me convinced (and I know this is your sole purpose in life ;) ) that markets and speculators in particular are a good thing or at worst have no effect on prices but let me pose a simplistic scenario and hopefully you can fill in the gaps in my limited knowledge of how markets work.

Lets say I make corn flakes and know I’ll need 100 pounds of corn in 6 months. Along comes a big late snowstorm, which is sure to have an impact on the crop and the price.

Knowing this I decide to lock in my 100 pounds of corn now – but seeing an opportunity to make a profit so do many others and that speculative interim demand (for lack of a better term) really jumps the price.

So corn that had been $1 before the storm now costs me $2 and the price continues on up to $3.

But, low and behold the storm wasn’t as bad as thought and the price starts to drop as speculators that bought on the way up take their profits and 6 months hence the price winds up at $1.99 to the people like me who actually take delivery and knew from experience that was about where it would finish.

So I understand from some of your previous posts that since I’m the guy with the most experience in the market and the one who really sets the price in the end I don’t get hurt and it’s only the speculators taking money from each other.

I guess the question in my admittedly little mind is what was the benefit of the extra liquidity in the market; except to the company that makes the ant-acid the farmer takes because he sold his crop early at (what seemed for a time anyway) the ridiculously low price of $1.98?

(don’t be harsh now :) )



If you trade wheaties, you probably spend sometime doing supply & demand analysis. You need to know beginning stocks of corn & other grains at the start of the growing season. You will need a crop estimate for the coming year. Maybe your own to compare against the USDA's official estimates. Then you will monitor the growing season for any expected deviations from your original forecast, and adjust your supply & demand analysis accordingly.

You will need good estimates of any imports coming into your area and any exports leaving. For this you have to have an idea of the basis between the local feed price and the price of futures at the CBOT or wherever your local delivery point is as well as rail, truck, water and barge freight rates between the local market and export or import markets.

You likely have an idea at what price your local feed dealer starts to substitute wheat for corn for barely for soybean meal for oats for fish meal for chicken poop in their feed formulas. And a general idea what your neighbors intend to do? Feed cattle or sell grain? Cut greenfeed or harvest grain or corn? And of course, everyone else in your industry is doing the same analysis. The feed companies, the elevator operators, the high fructose corn syrup maker, the foreign buyers of grain and your neighbors. If they are not doing this analysis then they are just taking price risk on the back of their own hunches. Tummy talk. The wind is blowing from the west today, so today is a good day to sell my corn.

Now assuming everyone is doing their homework they are all on the same level playing field and there is no inside information for anyone. Then between the producer and the end user are the speculators who add liquidity. They may be very sophicated and have done the same analysis or they may be technical traders and cannot be bothered. For them all the information is in the price, so no use to try to do supply & demand analysis.

They act as the liquidity between final buyer and final seller. What is their role and is it useful? Well, let us say, the price is rising and you're a farmer. You may want to wait before locking in your price for fear that you will sell while it goes even higher, and then at all the weddings this winter you will have to tell your neighbors that you sold at $2.50, and you do not want to hear the on the radio everyday at noon that futures went up to $3.00 after you sold.

The grain & feed dealer who is making feed for the poultry producer down the lane needs to buy corn at $2.50 and cannot risk the chance that prices spikes to $3.00 so he buys now. Someone has to step in between that seller who is waiting for $3.00 and can wait, and that buyer who needs $2.50 today. It might not be one speculator, but it might also be a chain of ten or 100 speculators. In the meantime (front month and futures month may be up to 12-months or more) they take the price from $2.35 to $3.15 and back down to $2.75 by the time the contract matures.

Technically, everyone is happy. The seller got his $3.00, and has bragging rights at all those curling bonspiels this winter. The grain & feed dealer locked in his price at $2.50, so he can sell his chicken feed for less than his competitor over in Hazard County. And the speculators are happy. They got to play. Some made money, some lost money. Those who won will keep playing until they lose it. Those who lost will be smarter for their experience and will maybe look to trade stocks or bonds next time. The money that one speculator takes of another is no business of the farmer or the feed & grain dealer. They got what they wanted. They hedged a rise or a fall in the price they received or paid.

Can those speculators make commodity prices go up and up and up regardless? No, because we started with that supply & demand analysis. If they take the futures price too high relative to the fundamentals of the market then the elevator operators will sell futures and buy physical grain in the country. And if the buyers are not willing to take delivery and pay storage, insurance and cost of interest (full carry) on their purchase then they want to sell their futures long before maturity.

And before next year's crop gets harvested, typically futures prices will drop in order to clear-out inventories in the elevator system to make room for next year's crop. If next year's crop is lying in the field, and there is no room in the elevator, then the grain company is going to drop the price it pays at the farmgate and offer export buyers incentives to buy grain now, so that they can get it out of the elevator terminal.

Then those futures buyers who are now holding physical grain will be competing with farmers to sell at a loss in the spot market. The farmers may be able to keep grain at home on the farm, but the speculators grain is in storage and costing money each month to roll.

Of course, the opposite may occur. The shorts always have to come to the longs. If someone sells futures they do not yet own, they need to buy them before maturity or buy the grain in the physical market and deliver it to the futures delivery point of the exchange. That may entail buying it in the country and then paying water, rail or truck freight to get it to the CBOT terminal or wherever.

Then their technical analysis ain't going to be of much use to them. Especially, when you buy a trainload of moist corn on rail and it is 90 degrees outside and sunny. And as the railroad is working flatout to ship priority coal for the electrics they shunt your cars onto a spur and there they sit, heating in the sun, until the corn starts to rot. Then you still need to make delivery to the CBOT, and you have a car full of rotten corn on the siding, which you may be able to sell for blending at 10 cents on the dollar. Forget compensation from the railroad. Unless you have a contract with them that specifies when and where and by what time they need to make delivery it all goes approximately to their schedule not yours.

Well, it has been a while since I traded grain, so maybe I missed something, but that is the general gyst of it. Hope it helps? I am really out of here this time. I had a corky bottle of white wine last night, and now I need to drink another to see if that was just an exception or not?

Have a nice weekend. Remember to eat your wheaties! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Is the oil market effecient?

Unread postby Pops » Fri 05 May 2006, 11:33:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')omeone has to step in between that seller who is waiting for $3.00 and can wait, and that buyer who needs $2.50 today.


Now I can understand that! I knew you would convince me.


Enjoy yourself and have one on me - a bowl of Wheaties that is ;>)
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 15 Aug 2006, 20:46:02

I read an article on MSMoney arguing that markets crash right when everyone decides it's a great investment. Right now, investors are making a lot of money in energy, people are getting convinced that the price of oil has no ceiling, that supply can no longer meet demand, that there is something new about today's market. It reminds me a little of the tech boom when people talked about tech being "different" from any other market and that super high valuations were warranted and that a NASDAQ at 5,000 was just the floor on the way to 10,000, then everything crashed.

What will keep this from playing out in the world oil markets? Hezbollah situation settles down, Iran settles down, North Korea settles down, etc. and people decide that oil is way overpriced at about the same time that a lot of new production comes on-line from the expensive to extract oil projects that are ramping up right now.

I'm convinced that Boone Pickens is right and that the world is pumping all it can, and it's just not enough. I think he puts the peak at 84 million barrels a day and that's about all we can do. But under what circumstances does anyone see the price going back to say $45-50 a barrel and a lot of new energy investors getting spanked? Isn't this what happened in the 1980s?

I know the short answer is that the 1970s was a political shortage and today is an actual shortage. But if you look at the Nigeria disruptions (terrorists), the Iraq disruptions (America attack), the Alaska disruptions (maybe a political angle there in political pressure not to maintain the pipeline), maybe today's failure to produce enough to meet demand is ultimately a political shortage as well.

I'm not convinced of this at all, but I'm interested in any comments about this perspective on the current state.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby americandream » Tue 15 Aug 2006, 23:27:31

I don't agree with conspiracist notions...no one with half an ounce of hedonism is going to want to shut this cruisy party we're enjoying down...NO ONE!! And if you disagree with me...I refer you to those over zealous Chinese Maoists who were quick to shed their blue rinsed overalls at the first sample of the fun.

I reckon a good 60% of our problems are down to the "Don't know" factor...we simply don't know whats down there and those Peak Oil geologists who have been working in the field are probably making a timely call seeing that our way of life is increasingly spreading it tentacles.

But conspiracy theories....NO.....maybe governtments conspire to rid themselves of competing systems and regions, but conspire to end a cruisy way of life...nope...don't believe that!

To the extent that we are manipulated and misled by well heeled elites to hang on their every word and declaration, yes, there's a conspiracy. Are these self same elites conspiring to end their cosy tenure.....not likely.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 15 Aug 2006, 23:58:48

I'm not saying that the current shortage is a deliberate political ploy like the 70s shortages. What I am saying is that the bottleneck may not be at the wellhead, it may be at the political level in a decentralized manner. Terrorists in Nigeria, insurgents in Iraq, sloppy maintenance in Alaska, nationalization in Venezuela. If you take those obstacles to peak production, which are not related to geological realities, production would be higher and would perhaps give us a better picture of how close we are to the real peak.

I'm not saying anyone is pulling the strings on the current situation, it just seems like Hubbert's Peak is about peaking production based upon geological realities, not transient political realities.

I'm not wedded to this notion, it's just something I would like to get some feedback from others on.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby Jacksoncage » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 02:47:06

Anywhere from 1/4th to 1/2 of the oil price is speculation right now. The fundamentals all say 40-60 dollars, but speculation is built into EVERY commodity. The only way there will be a price collapse is if the government outlaws speculation, but the Republicans aren't too keen on economic regulation. So, it'll happen in 2009 or 2010, when the fundamentals say 70-90 dollars a barrel and the speculations got it at 110-130 dollars. Pretty sad, really.
User avatar
Jacksoncage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 08 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby Jacksoncage » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 02:49:36

^^^^ and thats only if we have Democratic president.
User avatar
Jacksoncage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 08 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 02:59:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')'m not saying that the current shortage is a deliberate political ploy like the 70s shortages. What I am saying is that the bottleneck may not be at the wellhead, it may be at the political level in a decentralized manner. Terrorists in Nigeria, insurgents in Iraq, sloppy maintenance in Alaska, nationalization in Venezuela. If you take those obstacles to peak production, which are not related to geological realities, production would be higher and would perhaps give us a better picture of how close we are to the real peak.

I'm not saying anyone is pulling the strings on the current situation, it just seems like Hubbert's Peak is about peaking production based upon geological realities, not transient political realities.

I'm not wedded to this notion, it's just something I would like to get some feedback from others on.


Big Tex, if you can solve the problems (resource conflicts, regional wars & corruption) in Nigeria, Iran, Iraq, Chad, Sudan, Isreal/Hamas/Hizbollah/Syria, Venezuela and Bolivia for example, then you can knock $20 of geo-political risk premium off the price of crude.

But those problems are just as real as a refinery fire or a disruptive hurricane. They affect production. They are not easy to solve. Wars are probably easier to end than is endemic corruption. If you can, you'll probably win a Noble Peace Prize.

Then on the other hand, you have to address demand as well. Chindia, Asia and the developed world will suck up and use as much 'cheap' energy as you give them in pursuit of growth and higher living standards. Even solving the supply issues does nothing to curb demand which is insatiable.

At the end of the day, peak oil is a geological fact, not an economic problem to be solved.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby ohanian » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 03:02:03

According to MY CHART.

The price of oil will CRASH all the way to $67 dollars a barrel.

Image
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby SILENTTODD » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 03:13:15

I pray (and I’m an agnostic) the Peak Oil debunkers are right! But I don’t think they are. Which always leads me to the old adage “Expect The Best, But Prepare For The Worst”
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby mrobert » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 04:47:32

You don't have to be a genious to know that when using a commodity that has a fixed quantity, we will eventually run out (and peak before).
This is one side.

And offcourse, there is a lot of speculation on the market.

Open large buy orders on any stock market. The price will go up.
There is a high chance of a crash, because at some point, nobody would be interested in the respective stock.

It's not the same with oil. We are "interested in it". There won't be the case of not beeing able to sell it. So the price can be pushed up.

PeakOil is so damn easy to overcome and turn into nothing more then a news story and get over it ... but we not only that we are not helping ... we push it as much as we can.
User avatar
mrobert
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby zberry » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 05:39:38

The weekly chart of crude oil looks really strong. If the pattern holds true, we will continue to see a relentless rise in price, as we have the past three years, and as many peak oil experts predict. Not a spike necessarily, but just a continuous rise that eventually cooks us.
User avatar
zberry
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue 21 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 05:43:26

Geo-political supply risks
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t least 1.19 million barrels per day of global crude oil production is shut in due to unscheduled outages, enough to meet nearly 1.5 percent of global demand of about 85 million barrels.

Sabotage attacks, pipeline problems and hurricanes have shut in the crude. The shutdowns increase the strain on an already stretched global supply system, pumping at near full tilt to meet rapidly growing demand.

NIGERIA - AT LEAST 508,000 BPD OFFLINE

- At least 508,000 barrels per day of Nigerian crude oil output is shut in after militant attacks and pipeline leaks in the OPEC producer this year.


The gasoline-rich crude is favoured by refiners as they try to meet transport fuel demand. The crude is difficult to replace because most of the world's spare supply capacity is of heavier, sour oil.
FACTBOX-Global crude oil supply outages
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 07:54:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', 'A')nywhere from 1/4th to 1/2 of the oil price is speculation right now. The fundamentals all say 40-60 dollars, but speculation is built into EVERY commodity. The only way there will be a price collapse is if the government outlaws speculation, but the Republicans aren't too keen on economic regulation. So, it'll happen in 2009 or 2010, when the fundamentals say 70-90 dollars a barrel and the speculations got it at 110-130 dollars. Pretty sad, really.


I don't get what the "fundamentals" are that say we should be at $40-60. Like Boone Pickens says "Terror premium of $5? Who sets that premium? This is just the market price." It seems like if world demand is 85 million barrels a day but the world is only producing 84 million barrels then you can have prices go up almost indefinitely, since there is no substitute in the market (so economic analysis is not helpful, as we all know). If, however, world demand is 83 million barrels a day and the world is producing 84 million barrels a day the price COULD plummet, since you've got no excess demand to drive up prices.

But what are the "fundamentals" other than supply and demand, which only seem to ensure price volatility since a little shortage or a little surplus sends prices all over the place?

Right now there seems to be no surplus at all, which suggests the plateau or start downward on the peak curve. But if the current production is limited by political events and not geological events, is this the REAL plateau or something else?

Once again, think back to the 1970s. If you were having a peak oil conversation then a person could say "this is clearly the peak in worldwide production because of the price volatility and the lack of a surplus." The reply would have been "no, this is not a real shortage, it is a political shortage which will pass when the political events pass (OPEC embargo)."

This seems to be the conventional wisdom concerning why today is different from the 1970s. Today is the REAL peak, we say, rather than a political peak. I am just throwing the idea out there that there are a LOT of political events that are limiting production today, just like there were political events limiting production in the 1970s. There is asymmetry between the two periods because the 1970s shortage was the product of a centralized political event (OPEC embargo) and today's shortage is, in part, a product of a decentralized series of political events, but they are still political events limiting production.

I agree that rising demand is aggravating this whole situation. I also heartily agree that PO is not an economic problem with an economic solution. BUT, what were are concerned with is the TIMING of the peak, and maybe the current shortage is not as geology driven as some assume, and the real peak may be a ways off, as a downturn in the Chindian and U.S. economies and a settling down of world terrorism might demonstrate.

Again, I am not convinced of this at all, I just want to see what the different counterpoints are to this argument.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby peripato » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 08:59:49

There have been geopolitical upsets in the past (Iranian Revolution, Iran/Iraq War, Gulf War), and infrastructure bottlenecks too (Piper Alpha disaster) which kept a significant amount of oil off the international market as a result. During those occasions Saudi Arabia, as then world swing-producer, was able to flood the market with more than enough oil rather quickly (within a few months) and return the situation to normal - although this did not mean that there weren't price spikes during the duration of those crises. This time though no one is in a position to act as swing producer. Saudi production has been flat for over 3 years now, and that is the difference, which is why the "stubbornly" high prices of today are not the result of geopolitical problems, but rather because of the economics of oil at or near the peak of world oil production.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby firestarter » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 10:22:54

During the 1st Gulf War there was approx. 11bpd of spare capacity on the world market. Today, minus all the geopolitically caused supply disruptions, we'd maybe have about 2 mbd of spare capacity. However, with no apologies to the CERA crowd, that doesn't mean we haven't reached the all time peak of production potentiality. In other words, taking away the geopolitical roadblock that inhibits 2mbd of production does not ensure that we can pull anymore crude out of the ground beyond this present day, firing on all cylinders, optimal production yield. It's not inconceiveable that, politics notwithstanding, we are at peak right now, and the 2mbd offline is no more than a smokescreen to give us hope for better days ahead as long as we can potentially whip the world into shape for its 2mbd of supressed production yield.

Think of it this way, if 86mbd is the production peak, then wouldn't one look at the 2mbd spare capacity in a whole different light? If the above is true then $150 crude would probably be a bargain. That's why, unless oil traders are omniscient, the price of oil today, in the faux free market, is at best a crude (pun intended) guess.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby Scactha » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 10:24:13

Here´s a quote from The Economist August 12, that is the current issue; "Saudi Aramco´s proved reserves alone could keep the world supplied for several decades." Sound reassuring right?

Well, after you learn the difference between the reserves and resources not to mention the standard of data reporting out of SA you may be not so sure. You start to doubt the authors knowledge of the subject for even stumbling over such an important distinction.

I´d read the economical and the political picture before I decided and that says that there is great concern over this commodity in all camps. That at least is for sure.
User avatar
Scactha
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu 15 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby kjmclark » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 12:24:36

I think what we're seeing now is part market forces and part bubble. I suspect we really are at either the beginning of a short "undulating plateau" or actually at the peak of oil production. Either way, we'll be stuck at around this level of production (+- 5% or so) for a few years and then decline - slowly at first. Don't know how long a "few" will be.

If you think that the above is correct, then it would be perfectly reasonable to extend the current demand trends out a few more years and see that prices will increase *DRAMATICALLY* until there is sufficient demand destruction. It doesn't hurt (or help, depending on your perspective) that this particular commodity has some severe known and unknown risks surrounding production. These problems could, and in at least some cases probably will, result in some really astounding price spikes. This is certainly a good environment for a bubble to form, and as I said, I suspect that part of the price is due to a bubble forming.

All financial bubbles sow the seeds of their own demise, and this one is no different. The other side of the equation is demand, and while demand for petroleum is pretty inelastic in the short term, it is elastic in the long term. Falling auto, and particularly light truck, sales, falling housing sales, and inflation are some of the seeds that will eventually grow to strangle this bull by destroying demand. Happened last time, in the 70s, and will happen this time as well. I fully expect to see $40bbl oil again in the near future, within 10 years, possibly within 5.

There are two important points to remember about that. First, the drop in prices will come after prices have risen substantially, I think even from here. Second, unless there are some substantial technology improvements, petroleum finds, and/or reductions in consumption between now and then, it won't take 20+ years for prices to rise again this time. I strongly recommend Leeb's "The Oil Factor" and Kunstler's "The Long Emergency" to better understand what this process of rise, fall, and rise again should look like.
User avatar
kjmclark
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?

Unread postby NEOPO » Wed 16 Aug 2006, 14:23:10

How can you have actually read/experienced Kunstler and expect this to be similar to other "bubbles" et al of past economic cycles that existed on cheap energy?

This is denial.

Yes its still "cheap" yet this latest developement to $70+ could have been the real "correction" rather then a $40 a barrel "adjustment" that you see coming.
Write a book about that very subject "Why oil will be $20 a barrel by 2010" and I bet it would sell sell sell!!! ;-)

The price of a barrel has been kept down artificially and that brought the soviet union to its knees.
We have been playing the game for quite some time.

Lastly - show me elasticity - demonstrate real demand destruction based on price........come back once you are thoroughly exhausted and disgusted ;-)
_________________________

"Re: Is Peak Oil Really Just Oil Market Mania?"

Are you trying to humor us Tex?

$70 a barrel is cheap - a "glut" could occur yet $70 would still be CHEAP and the "glut" would be artificially induced and maintained yet I seriously doubt FOR LONG.

Factor in EROEI - Energy density - Geopolitics - exponential growth - depletion and a myriad of other factors and its easy to see that $70 is cheap.
__________________________
Walk with me ;-)

How does speculation always increase the price yet never decrease the price?

This is not a question that I desire an answer for rather a thought which I want you to ponder.

yes "why?" and I will answer now .... because we choose to believe so.
We fear the reality of the situation and attempt to create our own safer optomistic version thus "Speculation is to blame for high energy prices says a prominent economists today" makes a good news story and soothes us.

People flocked to church during the last great depression.
What do you suppose they will flock to this time?

another thought worthy of ponderance is....

Why trillions in debt to spread "democracy"?

Eternal and infinite laughter ;-)

Good luck and good night.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Efficient Market

Unread postby bulldozer » Mon 23 Oct 2006, 10:56:12

I was searching for information on "liquified coal" and discovered this article Free Market Energy Policy by Doug Bandow from the Cato Institute. It was published at a Conservative Christian website.

Mr.Bandow writes that more free markets would take care of our Oil and Energy problems.

I do wonder at his logic. He doesn't ask why we use so much energy and how. I mean, most of the suburbs we've built since 1945 would not have been built if the residents there had to pay for the massive expensive of highways, roads, sewers, water lines, and other infrastructure spread out over such low population densities.

This article was published at the Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics website. I looked at more of the website. The worldly issues it presents a focus on are abortion, homosexuality, and the theory of evolution. I find it interesting that this organization is so strongly allied with The Cato Institute. They show a strong disinterest in more relevant questions about the way we live. A strong desire to remain unconscious of the world around them and their influence on it.

It is as though they feel so entitled to so many comforts(much more unflappable than the sense of entitlement many socialists express directly) that they are willing to forego rationality to continue believing they deserve them. Just follow the right rituals, and every family can have at least two cars, a house in the suburbs, a riding lawn mower, a big screen tv, a fast growing Stock Portfolio, and not have to live near too-many-black-people or the workers who make most of the merchandise we consume. I realise Christianity means we don't have to be Jewish anymore, but does anyone remember the story about the Golden Calf?
User avatar
bulldozer
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon 23 Oct 2006, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron