by Carlhole » Wed 11 Oct 2006, 15:44:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', 'T')here just weren't photographers around to detail the damage to WTC7. They were many blocks away, running from the debris dust cloud, like everybody else. We'll never get photographic proof of the damage to WTC7.
According to a Popular Mechanics Magazine editor, its staff was shown photographs of damage to WTC7 by NYC police department. However, these photos are classified and unavailable to the public.
Why would they be classified? Or is Popular Mechanics lying about the photos?
According to the owner Silverstein, fire fighters had to be "pulled" from Building 7. He had a discussion with the Fire Chief and they decided to pull everyone out and then they all watched the building collapse. With all that attention focused on Building 7 by the owner and the City, did no one think to snap a photo as a record of the damage? Possible insurance considerations never arose in Silverstein's mind?
After all, building 7 was an enormously important building to the City of New York. The City, The Securities Exchange Commission, The IRS, The FBI, the CIA and the Secret Service - the all had offices there. Snapping a photo of the damage would have been a very simple, prudent and responsible thing for the Fire Department to do.
Mayor Rudy Giuliani was famously warned to vacate WTC7 in advance of its collapse and he is on record as saying so. Police and fire fighters are on film telling people to get out of the area because the building is going to collapse. With all that prior warning about its collapse, did no public, professional or private photographers ever take a picture of the building damage? HA!
Photos were being taken everywhere that day.
What are you asking me to believe again?