by WildRose » Sun 08 Oct 2006, 00:30:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kylon', 'I')t's well known that men on average prefer to read/learn about factual things, then read fictional novels.
The fact of the matter is, education is geared for girls, and this is completely intentional.
A few things I've observed about the educational system (in Alberta - could be very different from where you are), through my years as a parent/school volunteer/education student:
Boys usually do prefer to read nonfiction, but many girls also do (I always prefered the factual stuff). I think people who prefer nonfiction are the ones who later go on to careers in journalism, reporting, etc. As far as the subjects we all study in school, traditionally boys have achieved higher marks and shown greater interest in maths and sciences, whereas girls are better with the language arts. Again, this is a generalization because many women go on to study commerce and medicine, and other areas that were dominated by men in the past. I really think that each person has aptitudes which determine the subjects they shine in.
I don't know what the exact percentages are currently for male/female high school dropout rates, but when I look around I see about the same number of young girls as boys working at low-paying jobs during the day when you know they would be at school, if they were still in school. I think the school system is inadequate for many girls as well as boys, and I'll tell you why.
The system is really geared for preparing kids for college degrees. Course content in the core subjects grows every year (ask any teacher if it gets any easier from year to year to cover everything they need to with their class). Course content becomes more difficult all the time (what students learned in grade 11 five years ago is now being taught in grade 9, etc.). Not all students are wired for high academic achievement, constant studying, homework for hours every day. The ones who can achieve this move along at the desired rate and a lot of the time, teachers teach for the percentage of the class that can do this. Those students who struggle with this are basically left to their own - find a tutor, get mom and dad's help on a daily basis, whatever. By the time these kids reach high school, they're often overwhelmed, their confidence has all but disappeared, they haven't had a chance to develop the areas where they have talent, which a lot of the time is in the hands-on skills such as carpentry, mechanics, cooking, art.
I can't help but think that if the kids who have aptitudes in the hands-on skills had more opportunity to study in these areas, including job placements to put what they've learned into practice, they would be much more likely to enjoy school and get their diplomas. Awarding kids for their achievements in these areas would also help. For many years, I've watched as the same students, always high academic achievers, received award after award while those who do truly excellent work in other areas are not recognized. After a while, they start to believe they are just not capable.
I also think that the way instruction is delivered to students has traditionally favored girls. Young girls typically can sit for longer periods of time than boys. Girls are also quieter than boys and not as easily distracted. If the structure of a class doesn't allow for these features in boys, what happens is they make more trips to the office, don't absorb material as well as the girls, and they end up being diagnosed by educators as having attention-deficit disorders. Of course, this is not to say that some girls don't have the same problems in school, but they're more common in boys.
Praise also goes a long way in developing students, as does recognition of each student's good ideas and talents. These steps could go a long way in helping students in their social development and achievement. Whenever I meet young kids who have left high school, I wonder in which ways the system has failed them.