by foodnotlawns » Sat 07 Oct 2006, 13:01:35
To a large degree, we are all complicit in bad government.
At the risk of repeating what everyone here says already, we support the System by buying it's junk.
In a theoretical world, if super-human saints stopped going to Wal-Mart and started carpooling and saving every extra cent and hoarding it into gold and buying up farmland to "cut out the middleman and the tax-man" then we could collapse the System from within.
But being as we are fallible humans, we probably won't do this.
I actually held this anti-consumerist ideal for a while, and it benefitted me. I streamlined my life in many ways. I produce my own food, and I found a few other ways to gird my family against the coming hardships.
However, we have one major weakness -- we spend LOTS of money for our daughter's education and physical activities -- gymnastics, dancing (jazz, ballet and even belly dancing), piano lessons and soccer. She is a stellar student at her public school, so we are going to pretty much spend all our disposable income to send her to a nearby swanky private school. If she was not a good student, I would say, "Let her grow up to be a good Hausfrau." But because she really shows academic promise, we can not in good conscience deprive her of the best possible education. One thing -- we won't go into debt for it. If we can't pay as we go, we won't do it.
And so my idealistic ambition to be anti-consumerist failed spectacularly.
And everyone else has a totally justifiable reason that they cannot be anti-consumerist saints.
You know what, though? It's in the attempt to become an anti-consumerist saint, that you really find what matters. It's worth a try.
There is a common idea that the "hippie movement" was a failure. The hippies put away their love beads, gave up their organic farms, and tried to forget about that embarassing phase of their life.
But when I was in college and in the army, I met the children of hippies. They told me about their upbringing. They seemed emotionally well adjusted, and they knew a lot of good stuff that I didn't know. The female children of hippies were a lot less likely to go whoring around. The college and army girls that went really wild were the ones who had the strict religious upbringing.
I think the go-go times of the 80's disillusioned the hippies, and made them feel like they were "behind the times," when all the cool people were saying "greed is good."
But maybe they were right about a lot of things after all. The problem was, many of the hippies didn't understand the deeper reasons for being anti-consumerist crunchy granolas, and so they were easily led away from this superior lifestyle by the fashions of the times.
Someone made a point above that you need to make "off the farm income." That's true, unless the greater society decides that it's worth it to subsidize hand tool farmers. I saw a form of this in the post-Soviet Union era, in Russia in 1995. Old folks had their dacha in the countryside for free, and they had cheap rail transport from their gov't subsidized apartment in Moscow to their free dacha in the countryside. At the time, they were getting almost no pension, the equivalent of 10 dollars a month. So they would grow vegetables at their dacha, ride the railroad back to Moscow, and sell cucumbers and tomatoes at the side of the road. They even sold pickled foods, chickens, whatever. There was no USDA coming after them. They didn't have rototillers or tractors, they were hand tool farmers.
But since society isn't going to subsidize hand tool farmers, you have to make off-farm income your priority. This is kind of a shame, but it's the way it is. This is the US in 2006.
We know one thing, that America goes in boom and bust. What's the next boom? Anyone care to venture a guess? I have an answer, and I am going into the field. It's a field that makes perfect sense for doomers. Anybody want to take a guess what field I'm going into for my "off the farm" income?