Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Donald Rumsfeld (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Rumsfeld: democracy dieing in America

Unread postby Bobbotov » Thu 11 May 2006, 07:05:23

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country... Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money-power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed"

Abraham Lincoln

"If fascism came to America it would be on a program of Americanism"

Huey Long

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power"

Benito Mussolini

"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders . . . All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism."

Hermann Goering

"It also gives us a very special, secret pleasure to see how unaware the people around us are of what is really happening to them."

Adolf Hitler

"Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play."

Joseph Goebbels

"It is not the public who votes that determines a country's destiny but rather the ones who count the votes."

Joseph Stalin
User avatar
Bobbotov
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Rumsfeld: democracy dieing in America

Unread postby gg3 » Thu 11 May 2006, 08:04:53

That last quote is particularly ironic in light of the latest news of yet another fatal security hole found in Diebold voting machines:

You put a little program on a flash drive, then discretely plug it into the USB port on the machine, and your little program walks right into the stored folders in the MS Access database and rearranges the votes in whatever way you like. Then you remove your flash drive, walk away, and wash your hands.

That McGovern guy who stood up to Rumsfeld was a senior CIA analyst during the Bush Senior admin who was responsible for Bush's morning intel briefings. Not what I'd call a flaming liberal.

And the fact that he did it, and he held Rumsfeld's feet to the fire, and the whole thing was broadcast on national television, was IMHO not a sign of the end of democracy, but a sign of its continued strength and vigor.

We shall overcome this band of military incompetent, fiscally imprudent (Republicans just increased the national debt ceiling to TEN TRILLION DOLLARS), kleptocratic, lawbreaking, wanna-be tyrants, and they will go down in history as the worst Administration this nation has ever had to suffer. And we will move on.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby max_power29 » Tue 30 May 2006, 10:03:36

It looks like Rummy let a little bit of truth slip..oopsy! What do you all think of this?

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/143607/ru ... onfession/
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby LadyRuby » Tue 30 May 2006, 10:10:09

Means diddly.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby max_power29 » Tue 30 May 2006, 10:21:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('LadyRuby', 'M')eans diddly.


If it means "diddly" why wasn't this fact included in the "official" story? It rings of when bush mentioned the plane hitting the second tower before it hit the second tower.
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby gnm » Tue 30 May 2006, 10:33:32

Actually Bush said the he saw the video of the plane hitting the second tower.. He said it after it had actually hit the tower but well before any video had been available of it actually hitting the second tower. I think thats what you were referring to..

-G
gnm
 

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby max_power29 » Tue 30 May 2006, 11:24:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gnm', 'A')ctually Bush said the he saw the video of the plane hitting the second tower.. He said it after it had actually hit the tower but well before any video had been available of it actually hitting the second tower. I think thats what you were referring to..

-G


Ahhh yes, thanks.
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby jeezlouise » Tue 30 May 2006, 12:35:22

When is this from? It's very telling. Any speech or body language analysts out there who wanna give this one a shot??

And just for the record.. I think he said he saw the 1st plane crash (into the North tower) when the only footage of that wasn't available until the next day, but my guess is that he was just mixed up as usual.
User avatar
jeezlouise
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun 05 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby max_power29 » Tue 30 May 2006, 13:34:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jeezlouise', 'W')hen is this from? It's very telling. Any speech or body language analysts out there who wanna give this one a shot??

And just for the record.. I think he said he saw the 1st plane crash (into the North tower) when the only footage of that wasn't available until the next day, but my guess is that he was just mixed up as usual.


If i remember right, Bush actually mentioned seeing footage. Does anybody have access to this? I think the speech where he said this may have gone down the memory hole.
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby AlCzervik » Tue 30 May 2006, 14:32:12

Here is some stuff on the Bush slip up. I think his drug-addled brain just has everything mixed-up, but maybe there is more to it.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/bushlie.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bushflub.htm
AlCzervik
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Wed 14 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Motor City

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby Atlantean_Relic » Tue 30 May 2006, 14:57:35

I think Bush could get up and devulge his plans for world domination and nothing would happen. You know as long as I'm safe from furry little terrorists in my SUV, It's all good.
User avatar
Atlantean_Relic
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon 24 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North of Id, west of Oz, and infront of the damned rabbit

Re: Rumsfeld lets some truth slip

Unread postby max_power29 » Tue 30 May 2006, 15:13:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Atlantean_Relic', 'I') think Bush could get up and devulge his plans for world domination and nothing would happen. You know as long as I'm safe from furry little terrorists in my SUV, It's all good.


This is true, but people are always dismissing conspiracy as tin foil hat wearing subject matter for paranoid people. Here is a video with Rumsfeld saying that flight 93 was shot down, but somehow this was overlooked in the official report? Conspiracy is real folks and it happens every day and it is overlooked. Thats why large conspiricies are possible, the facts are simply overlooked or dismissed.
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun

Three Retired Officers Demand Rumsfeld's Resignation

Unread postby qwerty » Mon 25 Sep 2006, 19:16:32

Rummy MUST RETIRE!!


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hree retired military officers who served in Iraq called today for the resignation of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, telling a Democratic "oversight hearing" on Capitol Hill that the Pentagon chief bungled planning for the U.S. invasion, dismissed the prospect of an insurgency and sent American troops into the fray with inadequate equipment.

The testimony by the three --two retired Army major generals and a former Marine colonel -- came a day after disclosure of a classified intelligence assessment that concluded the war in Iraq has fueled recruitment of violent Islamic extremists, helping to create a new generation of potential terrorists around the world and worsening the U.S. position.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n testimony before the Democratic Policy Committee today, retired Maj. Gen. John R.S. Batiste, who commanded the 1st Infantry Division in Iraq in 2004 and 2005 and served as a senior military assistant to former deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz, charged that Rumsfeld and others in the Bush administration "did not tell the American people the truth for fear of losing support for the war in Iraq."

He told the committee, "If we had seriously laid out and considered the full range of requirements for the war in Iraq, we would likely have taken a different course of action that would have maintained a clear focus on our main effort in Afghanistan, not fueled Islamic fundamentalism across the globe, and not created more enemies than there were insurgents."

Joining his call for Rumsfeld to resign were retired Army Maj. Gen. Paul D. Eaton, who was responsible for training Iraq's military and police in 2003 and 2004, and retired Marine Col. Thomas X. Hammes, who served in Iraq in 2004 and helped establish bases for the reconstituted Iraqi armed forces.

Rumsfeld, appearing at a news briefing with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, rejected the demands for his resignation. Asked about the Capitol Hill hearing and whether he was considering stepping down, Rumsfeld shook his head slightly and mouthed the word "no" before calling for the next question.

Democrats today sought to make the most of the National Intelligence Assessment and of the retired officers' remarks at the hearing, which Democratic leaders said they had to hold by themselves outside the regular congressional process because of the Republican leadership's persistent "neglect" of oversight.
"...the US, Great Britain, and Israel; the real Axis of Evil..." - Michael C. Ruppert
User avatar
qwerty
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun 03 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby Zardoz » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 03:10:22

I think this qualifies as a "bombshell":

Papers sold to military: ‘Rumsfeld must go’

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ust days after President Bush publicly affirmed Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's job security through the end of his term, a family of publications catering to the military will publish an editorial calling for the defense secretary's removal...

...The editorial will appear just one day before the midterm election, in which GOP candidates have been losing ground, according to recent polls.

"This is not about the midterm elections," continued the editorial, which will appear in the Army Times, Air Force Times, Navy Times, and Marine Corps Times on Monday. "Regardless of which party wins Nov. 7, the time has come, Mr. President, to face the hard bruising truth: Donald Rumsfeld must go."

Not about the elections? The timing is just a coincidence? Yeah, right!

This is another indicator of the deep resentment felt in the military about their so-called Commander-In-Chief, his henchman Rummy, and the Neocons in general. These people have made life miserable for a lot of U.S. military personnel, and it looks like there's some score-settling attempts being made here.
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 03:45:41

I applaud them for standing up to the administration, but I need to temper that with a phrase:

Military coup

As much as I may not like Bush, I like the idea of President Keating* a whole lot less.

*Admiral Timothy Keating is the Commander of USNORTHCOM and NATO. Since the JCS falls outside the normal chain of command, Keating (Or perhaps General James Cartwright, Commander of USSTRATCOM) seem the most likely to take over in the event of a coup.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby NEOPO » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 10:21:55

Is keating a neocon bohemian grove skull and bones person?;-)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby DantesPeak » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 12:22:48

It has been said Rumsfeld has previously offered to resign on more than one occasion, but 'stay the course' GWB won't accept that.

While a military coup to me is a very bad idea, as long as GWB doesn't order a nuclear attack on Iran or North Korea, the military might be able to stall GWB and hang on for another two years in Iraq - until the next President comes in. But that also might be risky - I expect eventually radical Islam will assert itself even more in Iraq or somewhere else in the Persian Gulf region. This could put the strained US military even in more of a corner.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 12:30:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'I')t has been said Rumsfeld has previously offered to resign on more than one occasion, but 'stay the course' GWB won't accept that.


Rumsfeld is doing exactly what the President wants him to do.

And even if they did mutually decide to let him resign, They'd keep it for something to trade in a negotiation with a Democrat led House or Senate. I see no positive political result for the administration in having to go through a new Secretary of Defense confirmation hearing; so they'd want to get something of high value out of the action.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile a military coup to me is a very bad idea


Leave that fantasy at the door. If there were a military coup, it would be of the far right character. The idea that the military would turn to left wing ideology has got to be the most wild fantasy that inhabits this board.

A coup would be for the purpose of nuking Iran; not to prevent it.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 12:48:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'I')s keating a neocon bohemian grove skull and bones person?;-)


I honestly don't know. I made that post right before bed last night and haven't had the time to research his bio yet. I'll have to get back to you on that.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', 'L')eave that fantasy at the door. If there were a military coup, it would be of the far right character. The idea that the military would turn to left wing ideology has got to be the most wild fantasy that inhabits this board.

A coup would be for the purpose of nuking Iran; not to prevent it.


That's what I'm saying. The prospect of another 2 years of Bush is pretty depressing, but the prospect of "President Keating" or worse, "President Cartwright" should be downright terrifying.

Nobody (and I do mean NOBODY) here should be hoping for a military coup to save them.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Military publications call for Rumsfeld's ouster

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 13:02:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', 'Y')ou mean... gulp... we have to save ourselves? :roll:


Well, nobody else is going to do it for you. Only you can make the choice - master of your own destiny, or slave to the will of others.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest