by Free » Wed 20 Sep 2006, 17:37:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'I') would like to think that too, Free. But there is a little problem here in the US. We are far more dependant on easy motoring. Houses built very far from work centers. A whole way of life built on commuting 40, 50, 60 miles in each direction every day. When gasoline becomes too expensive to support this arrangement there will be millions of people left high and dry, stranded in a dysfunctional system. It could get real ugly real fast.
That might well be true, but you have also loads of the most valuable resources on this planet: Space, soil.
There are so few people per square mile, you could feed double your current population (ok maybe an exaggeration, but you get the point.)
In contrast I shudder to think what happens if Europe has no fossil fuel agriculture anymore.
So I think you are right in the short term, lots of ruckus, big trouble, because you will "fall deeper", and have a less cohesive social organisation and tradition - but in the long run, if you manage the transition to an agrarian, sustainable system - you are way better off than for example Europe.