Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Euric » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 12:44:06

http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/060918/economy.html?.v=2

Interesting article in that it shows the US deficits are not being funded. They are getting only about 50 % of the needed monthly inflow.

How long will it be before the US has to raise interest rates to exceedingly high levels to compensate?

Best thing to do is for the US to start holding euros in reserve, if they haven't started already.

Reuters
Current account gap up, capital inflows fall
Monday 2006-09-18 11:59 ET
By Doug Palmer


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Surging oil costs helped widen the U.S. current account deficit more than expected in the second quarter and capital flows into the United States in July ebbed, government reports showed on Monday.


The $218.4 billion quarterly current account shortfall was larger than Wall Street forecasts for a deficit of $214 billion, a Commerce Department report showed. The government raised its estimate of the first-quarter current account deficit to $213.2 billion from a previously reported $208.7 billion.

Both reports measure what world financial leaders call 'trade imbalances,' which include the large U.S. trade deficit and capital flows from countries with large trade surpluses to the United States. These officials have warned that a sudden shift in capital flows could endanger the world economy.

The current account, the broadest measure of U.S. trade with the rest of the world, includes both trade in goods and investment flows. The deficit totaled 6.6 percent of gross domestic output, the same as in the first quarter.

A separate Treasury Department report showed net flows of capital to the United States fell to a much smaller-than-expected $32.9 billion in July, less than half of the U.S. trade deficit in that month.

U.S. government bond prices extended losses after the data showed a sharp decline of net inflows into Treasuries. The benchmark 10-year Treasury note's price traded down 9/32 in price for a yield of 4.83 percent. (US10YT=RR).

The dollar briefly fell to session lows against the euro but then retraced most of the losses as dealers quickly turned their focus more on upcoming inflation data on Tuesday and a meeting of the Federal Reserve on Wednesday.

Stocks were little changed as a downgrade of Home Depot Inc. (NYSE:HD - News) offset optimism that Fed policy-makers will continue to hold interest rates steady.

Analysts were expecting net capital inflows into the United States of $70 billion.

CHANGING CONDITIONS

Market conditions have changed significantly since the data for both reports were collected. Oil prices were rising the second quarter and hit a record $78.40 a barrel in July, but have since fallen to about $63 a barrel in New York trading. The Dow Jones industrial average was below 10,700 in mid-July, and has since risen above 11,500.

Alan Ruskin, chief international strategist at RBS Greenwich Capital, said the most interesting feature of the current account report might have been the record $4.1 billion deficit on investment income flows in the second quarter.

"This is going to highlight ... that the U.S. is a net debtor and as such is paying out more income than it is receiving. That has been anticipated for a long time and it is finally coming home to roost," Ruskin said.

The Commerce Department revised its first-quarter estimate of the investment income balance to a deficit of $2.5 billion, from a previously reported surplus of $1.9 billion.

The goods deficit increased to $210.6 billion in the second quarter from $208.0 billion in the first.

Foreign demand for industrial supplies and materials and capital goods pushed U.S. exports to $252.8 billion in the second quarter, from $244.5 billion in the first.

That was overshadowed by the effect of higher oil prices, which boosted imports to $463.4 billion in the second quarter, from $452.5 billion in the first, the Commerce Department said.

The huge current account gap has put downward pressure on the dollar in recent years. The greenback depreciated 3 percent on a trade-weighted average basis against a Group of Seven major currencies in the second quarter, the report said.

In July, private net buying of U.S. assets fell to $31.8 billion, the lowest since May 2005, in what analysts took to be a danger sign for appetite for U.S. assets.

"This is a very disturbing number and clearly we were unable to finance our deficit for the month of July," said Michael Woolfolk, a senior currency strategist at the Bank of New York.

(Additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal)
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 15:49:51

All of this and US treasury yields are still off their highs of a few weeks ago.

What gives?

If inflows are falling and the savings rate is essentially 0, why are treasury prices being pushed up?
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Euric » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 18:21:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'A')ll of this and US treasury yields are still off their highs of a few weeks ago.

What gives?

If inflows are falling and the savings rate is essentially 0, why are treasury prices being pushed up?


It is all part of American deception. When you are bankrupt and can't pay your bills you try not to draw attention to it. You try to give the illusion that everything is fine.

If they raised the treasury rates then it would be obvious something is wrong. Raising the rates without a demand to do so would have adverse effects in other sectors of the economy, such as housing and car sales, which are miserable.

Also, remember, the federal government doesn't publish the M3 anymore, so the hope is that no one will notice that the debts are underfunded. If this article hadn't been published and thus exposing this reality, the assumption would be on the part of most investors that the debts are being secured, and thus it is safe to continue to invest.

If more articles like this surface, showing the same trend for other months, then the US will have no choice but to raise rates. I have the feeling though, that future articles like this will be impossible to find as the feds would try and block such information from being published.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 18:24:59

The treasury yields I'm talking about are the 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 30-year bonds.

Major yield decline, meaning, major price increase.

Who is bidding up the price of US debt?
Last edited by Tyler_JC on Mon 18 Sep 2006, 20:23:10, edited 1 time in total.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby rwwff » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 18:38:11

They're betting a depression will do the same as it did in the early 1930's. Solid deflation would make these bonds totally golden. Thats a big if though.

If one were to pick up some gold, and pick up some tbills, you'd be set to thread the needle. Maybe your net yield wouldn't be great if the economy just keeps on keepin on at 3%; but your capital would be preserved; and at either extreme, the gain you make on one could keep you from going under during the rocky parts.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Euric » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 18:44:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'T')he treasury yields I'm talking about are the 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 30-year bonds.

Image

Major yield decline, meaning, major price increase.

Who is bidding up the price of US debt?


Obviously no one. But then who would? If I'm the US government wanting to sell a bond, I'd set the rate at what I'm willing to pay out. I may feel that 4.8 % is the amount I'm willing to pay upon maturity.

Others may not have faith in my bonds so they don't buy. If I want to sell them bad enough, I have to raise the rates high enough to attract buyers. But maybe I don't want to, so I don't.

A home owner may wish to sell his home and expects a given price. But his price is too high and no one takes the offer. So, the house doesn't sell. Logic would state that he would have to lower his price to a point where it attracts the interest of buyers, but that price may be too low for what the home owner really wants to get, so he defies logic and keeps his price high and of course the house is on the market a long time with no sale. If it comes to a point where he needs to sell that house, for whatever reason, then he has no choice but to lower the price to an acceptable value.

Same with US treasuries. If they keep lowering the yield instead of raising it, thus going against the logical step, then they risk even selling less bonds in the future then they are now. It all depends on how long they can hold out not selling bonds before they crack and have no choice but to offer higher rates. Until then they will try to offer the lowest rates and hope to hades enough buyers are suckered in.

Time is not on their side.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 19:55:59

It sounds like the golden question is when does panic set in? Capital inflows are half of what they were, thats a pretty smart drop, and far from what they need to be. If that isn't a blip and continues the snap couldn't be far off I would think.

The only solution likely in the fed's arsenal that I can think of is rapidly raising rates and monetizing the debt as much as possible. Both would be disastrous for the economy.

Other possibilities are rapidly rising exports or declining imports, especially oil prices, very unlikely.

The only modern parrallel I can think of is Argentina

What would the revaluation of China's yuan have on the current accoun and how much effect would there be? Less imports from China and possibly more US exports to China.


... I'm actually intellectually afraid to use my brain and follow the logical steps especially when my brain is already fried from work. lol
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby NTBKtrader » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 20:24:34

According to news reports China's trade surplus reached $95.7 billion through the first eight months of the year with the US. Which means it will be about $140 billion by the end of the year. The deficit in trade, which accounted for most of the total current-account imbalance, widened to $193.8 billion in the 2nd quarter.

It appears to me if we force China to revalue it's yuan/unpeg it's currency then our current account balance would have a large possibility of being greatly improved.
User avatar
NTBKtrader
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 600
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Euric » Mon 18 Sep 2006, 23:51:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NTBKtrader', 'I')t sounds like the golden question is when does panic set in? Capital inflows are half of what they were, thats a pretty smart drop, and far from what they need to be. If that isn't a blip and continues the snap couldn't be far off I would think.



The problem isn't that the amounts invested in treasuries are half previous investments, the problem is they are only getting half what is needed to secure the present level of debt.

It is like needing to borrow 60 G$/month to keep your business afloat and only getting half that. To offset that deficit in needed funds means Washington will have to print more dollars to make up the difference. But those dollars will have no real value and too many of them floating around will cause or should cause a rapid drop in the dollar's value.

This is what happened to countries like Argentina in the past. They incurred huge debts, but because they could not get investors to lend them the money to keep the debts secured, they resorted to printing money. The result was hyperinflation.

The US never experienced hyperinflation despite their excessive debts because they have always found enough investors to buy the bonds, thanks mostly to petrodollar recycling.

Now that it is obvious the debts aren't being funded an Argentina style hyperinflation is the most likely scenario.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Euric » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 00:06:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'T')hey're betting a depression will do the same as it did in the early 1930's. Solid deflation would make these bonds totally golden. Thats a big if though.

If one were to pick up some gold, and pick up some tbills, you'd be set to thread the needle. Maybe your net yield wouldn't be great if the economy just keeps on keepin on at 3%; but your capital would be preserved; and at either extreme, the gain you make on one could keep you from going under during the rocky parts.


I take it when you write "they" that you mean the ultra rich who run the US. To those that have everything or close to it a depression would be in their best interest. To the country and the rest of the people, hyperinflation would be a better direction.

In a depression the value of money is not lost. If you don't lose your money or you have a way to make money, you will do very well. Those with debts and no or little income will suffer heavily. Depressions don't wipe away debts, so what ever debts you had before a depression begins you will still have them during.

Hyperinflation on the other hand destroys the value of money. So those that have it will see it become worthless in front of their very eyes. If you have none, you lose really nothing. Hyperinflation has the wonderful effect of wiping out debts. Thus the majority of indebted Americans would be able to pay off debts as debts don't hyperinflate.

If you owe 1000 $ and the currency hyperinflates by a factor of 1000, then obtaining the 1000 $ would be as easy as obtaining 1 $ before the economy inflated. You pay your 1000 $ debt, but the person who it is owed to only gets 1 $ in real value.

I don't think there is much one can do to chose which way the economy will go. Most likely, it will take the hyperinflation route and not the depression route.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 00:26:51

Hyperinflation would have the appreciable side affect of continuing to prop up the real estate racket a little while longer, as long as no one is really paying attention...
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 19 Sep 2006, 03:02:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'T')he treasury yields I'm talking about are the 2-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 30-year bonds.

Major yield decline, meaning, major price increase.

Who is bidding up the price of US debt?


The trade data is from Q2'06 and we are already in the third week of September. Since then the Fed paused at 5.25%, and as the data has been mixed, some long bond funds have taken it as a signal to pile back into treasuries. That is why the 10-yr UST is at 4.80% now.

The same logic why the stock market started to rally. They think either that the Fed is done or that Bernanke is a little soft on inflation? I doubt whether the Fed is done. The data is still mixed, but there are enough signs of inflation out there that I think the Fed will have to continue to raise rates. Six month and one year LIBOR are trading at or close to 5.50%, so the money markets are still pricing in at least one more rate hike.

Because the data has been mixed you have not seen excessive weakness in the dollar against the euro, but also because the euro is historically high against both the yen and the yuan. EURJPY is at 150.00 right now, while against the dollar the euro has been in a tight range around $1.2700. What this means is that eurozone exports are having a hard time to compete against dollar exports (you see the jump in US exports in the numbers from Q2 '06 which are overshadowed by imports of oil, but up none the less), and the strong euro is sucking in record amounts of Chinese imports. That is why Chinese trade with the rest of the world has grown faster than China's trade surplus with the USA.

What we have is currency manipulation on the part of Asian central banks, especially China and Japan, to keep their currencies competitive, while some OPEC producers peg their own currencies to the dollar. This effectively inhibits the downward correction in the dollar needed to address the current account deficit by making US assets more attractive. At least on the trade side. The US budget deficit is another story.

Some argue that a weaker US dollar and higher interest rates would force the US to save more and run lower budget deficits, but whereas I fully buy the currency manipulation argument, I do not accept the budget argument as I have seen zero interest from anyone in Washington interested in tackling structural deficits. With an election in November, no one is talking about this. That you cannot blame on Asian central banks. It is a domestic problem.

I never agree with anything Euric says, unless I am forced to, but in this case he is correct without knowing why he is right. There has been a noticable drop in foreign investors appetite for US assets, and the US will therefore struggle to refinance their gaping current account deficit going forward, unless the dollar is allowed to fall (not going to happen due to oil exports receipts and Asian central banks) and US real interest rates rise above where they are now (and that might trigger a hard landing). However, he is wrong that this is not out in the Press. I read the same version of this story several times already. Including at RGE Monitor on Brad Setser's blog where he does an even better job of analyzing the drop in foreign purchases of US treasuries.

RGE Monitor - Brad Setser

As for the US holding more euros in their foreign reserves. They already do hold euros as well as a basket of other currencies for intervention purposes, but when you're already running a current account deficit that you are having to refinance with higher US interest rates than in the eurozone, it makes very little sense to borrow more dollars to sell, to buy euros, which you then earn a lower interest rate on or not?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby DantesPeak » Mon 25 Sep 2006, 12:29:07

I agree pretty much with Mr. Bill, except to qualify that I don't think central banks like China have an unlimited ability to fix the dollar's exchange value within a narrow range. This is not because lack of trying, but the sheer magnitude of the current account deficit - which keeps growing and growing.

The relatively stable US dollar implies that we have not quite yet reached the absolute limit of current deficit financing by foreigners, but that limit might only be slightly higher than what they are financing now.

The trend is ominous - now the current account is grwoing just due to interest payments on prior US debt to foreigners. This is a good reason why the Fed will be very slow about cutting rates in the future.

Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U').S. Foreign Debt
Shows Its Teeth
As Rates Climb

Net Payments Remain Small
But Pose Long-Term Threat
To Nation's Living Standards
By MARK WHITEHOUSE
September 25, 2006; Page A1

Over the past several years, Americans and their government enjoyed one of the best deals in international finance: They borrowed trillions of dollars from abroad to buy flat-panel TVs, build homes and fight wars, but as those borrowings mounted, the nation's payments on its net foreign debt barely budged.

Now, however, the easy money is coming to an end. As interest rates rise, America's debt payments are starting to climb -- so much so that for the first time in at least 90 years, the U.S. is paying noticeably more to its foreign creditors than it receives from its investments abroad. The gap reached $2.5 billion in the second quarter of 2006. In effect, the U.S. made a quarterly debt payment of about $22 for each American household, a turnaround from the $31 in net investment income per household it received a year earlier.

If the trend persists, it could also raise concerns about the nation's creditworthiness, putting pressure on the U.S. currency. "It's an additional challenge for the dollar," says Jim O'Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs in London. "Economists have been warning about this for so long that people have gotten bored, but now we're starting to see the deterioration."

Since the end of 2001, when the current economic expansion began, the nation's consumption, investment and other outlays have exceeded income by a cumulative $2.9 trillion -- the largest gap on record. That current-account deficit contributes directly to the nation's total foreign debt, the value of all the U.S. stocks, bonds, real estate, businesses and other assets owned by non-U.S. residents. As of the end of 2005, total U.S. foreign debt stood at $13.6 trillion -- or about $119,000 per household. Net foreign debt, which excluded the $11.1 trillion value of U.S.-owned foreign assets, was $2.5 trillion.


Wall Street Journal
subscription may be required
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey
Top

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby Bewildebeest » Mon 25 Sep 2006, 20:10:04

I've heard many people recommend T-bills as a good safe haven, in addition to gold. Why not choose foreign currency instead, to protect against a collapsing dollar? Which should be safer in the next 2-3 years, T-bills or foreign currency (via ETF or bank CD)?
User avatar
Bewildebeest
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu 25 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Current account gap up, capital inflows fall

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 27 Sep 2006, 10:15:48

DankesPeak
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') agree pretty much with Mr. Bill, except to qualify that I don't think central banks like China have an unlimited ability to fix the dollar's exchange value within a narrow range. This is not because lack of trying, but the sheer magnitude of the current account deficit - which keeps growing and growing.


For the official record. I do not think they can hold it within a range indefinately either. At the current pace of expansion eventually the US current account deficit would consume 100% of the world's savings as opposed to 70% now, and we all know that America cannot consume more than 100%, so eventually there has to be a correction.

One simple theory (except I forgot the name) is that you can only consume what you earn over your lifetime, including what you borrow, unless you die first, and then your creditor has to accept that loss.

Applied the USA. They can only consume what they produce, plus what they borrow in the form of the current account deficit, less what they pay in interest, less what they repay, and of course, less what they default on. Any defaults will be born by the US' creditors as nations can only go broke, but they cannot go bankrupt.

The accumulated debt and interest payments will lower future consumption in the USA, and therefore lower future growth in China. I do not see a dearth of foreign investment changing that much? Rather I see private investors stepping in to plug the hole if and when central banks and oil exporters are no longer willing or able. Of course, that means higher real interest rates, likely a lower dollar, and that covering of the debt will come at the expense of investment in the real economy or stock market for example lowering growth as well.

Pain all around. There seems to be a misconception that some will avoid it and that it is an American problem? I disagree.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron