by Miki » Wed 06 Sep 2006, 04:29:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'I')s the man who straps the victim into the guillatine the killer? Or the one that slips the rope? Does anything change from the perspective of the restrainer if that rope slipping task becomes automated?
Does the restrainer do his task intentionally?
The restrainer is guilty to the extent that he could refuse to do his job. Unless his life was in danger for doing so (refusing), it is his moral obligation to refuse. Even if his life was in danger, he'd still be guilty (to a certain extent) if he performed the job, albeit his moral responsability would be much lower than if his life was not in danger.
So much for ambiguous ethical scenarios. Let's move on to the US:
1-Your meataphor doesn't apply. The US did not just "stage the set". The US went inside Irak with a goal in mind and all the intention to achieve that goal, whatever "collateral damage" resulted in the process. You and I know that the US started all this because they wanted a regime change in Irak. The removal of Saddam was just a tiny part of the regime change. What they really want is to put a puppet in the Iraki government that will cater to their interests (read OIL and HEGEMONIC agendas in the ME).
The Iraki insurgents and their other terrorist allies are not stupid. They know what this is all about, and they have been resourceful enough to keep the US engaged in Irak for 3 years, and to render all US efforts FUTILE, because we all know that violence in Irak increases by the day, and that the Iraki "government"/US army have no control over them whatsoever.
2-
PMS: The US stayed in both Irak and Vietnam for too long. Saddam was gone 3 years ago. We can understand an initial mistake, but 3 years of mistakes that involve thousands of innocent civilians killed is way too much. At this point, the only morally right outcome would be for Bush to sit alongside Saddam in trial.
The WORLD has been telling the US to stop the slaughter and come back home. Since the US invaded Irak, the incidence of terrorism has increased both in Irak and in the world. Your president is an extremist rigid arrogant individual who just can't accept failure and go home. On top of that, he plans to replicate his mistakes in Afghanistan, Irak and Lebanon, in Iran and Syria. How many more people have to die before America is held accountable for its "mistakes" (aka, war crimes)?