by lorenzo » Sat 02 Sep 2006, 17:59:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') thought they were going to cut down the Yantze forests to plant rapeseed....
You can't have both, lorenzo, not in the same place. You can't have rapeseed fields and rainforest in the same land area. So which is it to be? Rainforests, or biofuel plantations?
See, this kind of posts really explains why people think Peak Oil fanatics are really crazy, or simply not very intelligent.
There are no forests in the Yangtze valley. That's the whole point.
Whenever I talk about biofuels that can be planted in the desert or in some place where there are no forests, - you peak oil lot come up with tropical rainforests that have nothing to do with biofuels.
That's why I kindly asked the poster to stop his intellectual dishonesty.
But then you come in, showing you don't have the vaguest clue what you're talking about.
Moreover, had you read the article, you would have learned that
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')If grown in high altitude regions, such as West China's Qinghai Province, it was two to three percentage points higher in oil content, the ministry said.
You would then have looked up "Qinghai Province", and you would have learned that there are no forests there either. The average elevation of Qinghai province is 3000 metres above sea level.
Djee, sometimes I really begin to doubt the intellectual capacities of Mr Peak Oil Average.