by mekrob » Mon 14 Aug 2006, 20:30:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Taskforce_Unity', 'P')artially yes, a 75% watercut is nothing unusual though. Many fields are produced with a watercut around that size (being depleted as such).
They can even be much much higher. Quoting from Twilight in the Desert (not perfect for analytical purposes, but fine for historical):
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hile the whole "water in oilfields" issue has been a relatively obscure one, the volume of water produced from the world's oil fields is now estimated to exceed
200 million barrels per day, nearly three times the volume of the oil.
Oil wells in the United States produce more than seven barrels of water for each barrel of oil brought out of the ground. Unless if my math is way off or Simmons is wrong, that's a 75% water cut for the world and 87.5% for the US.
I can sort of believe the 87.5% figure simply because the US is so old, but 75% for the world? Could the 200 mpd of water really be injection and not extraction?