Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 09:24:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')idn't you claim you're in Lebanon? I don't believe you. The country is in a war and you're sitting around on the Internet all day.


Well, as it turns out, there's no gas for me to leave the house unless I need to see a Dr. Neither is it safe to drive with the IDF whimsically bombarding *any* bridges. And I live in the *safest* area at this point, as I'm 1 hour N of Beirut.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think you're a fraud. Prove that you are in Lebanon?


What you think is irrelevant to the discussion. Neither am I interested in proving anything to you. I couldn't care less about what you think.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 09:28:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')May I know why you feel so threatened by immigration? I can't make sense of that.



Immigration is okay :) ILLEGAL immigration isn't so okay :-x The government (corptocracy) encouraging illegal immigration is positively sickening [smilie=cussing.gif]


At this point it is useless to blame the corporations. The fact is that American economy depends heavily on the illegal workforce. Not to mention that the immigrants will soon outnumber the "mainstream" Americans, which of course will give them the power to decide who stays, who leaves, and who governs.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby rwwff » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 09:37:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'A')t this point it is useless to blame the corporations. The fact is that American economy depends heavily on the illegal workforce. Not to mention that the immigrants will soon outnumber the "mainstream" Americans, which of course will give them the power to decide who stays, who leaves, and who governs.


We're all immigrants, and we've outnumbered to original Americans for a very, very long time.

I do know what you're talking about, but you're misreading the demographics. Northern Europeans will remain the largest ethnic group in America for a very long time; they just won't be the majority of all Americans. Not that I really understand what the big deal is, the new guys certainly don't come to Texas for the free services! Ha!
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby firestarter » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 10:21:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')May I know why you feel so threatened by immigration? I can't make sense of that.



Immigration is okay :) ILLEGAL immigration isn't so okay :-x The government (corptocracy) encouraging illegal immigration is positively sickening [smilie=cussing.gif]


At this point it is useless to blame the corporations. The fact is that American economy depends heavily on the illegal workforce. Not to mention that the immigrants will soon outnumber the "mainstream" Americans, which of course will give them the power to decide who stays, who leaves, and who governs.



In post peak America I don't suspect it'll be "useless" to blame anyone for anything, corporations included. Alpahbet soup societies generally do okay when the times are relatively properous, however, WTSHTF all bets are off, especially concerning the power of the plebes vis a vis the franchise.

As for the present workforce "depending heavily on the illegal workforce", Mr. Peter Brimelow along with many others, including myself call bs on that fiction. Hell, even the Keynsian crusader, Bob Samuelson sees clear through the workforce shibboleths.

Getting back to the original point of why illegal immigration matters, it matters because in the GWB world of cowboy diplomacy, a simpler, less bloodlusting solution would be to secure the country's borders (NAFTA be damned for the time being), especially if the "Islamofascist" threat is as serious as the chief keeps lamenting to us that it is. A porus border subsequent to 9/11 tells me more than I need to know about what the so called threat really entails: not securing the border/s makes preemption all the more necessary in the Bush administration's twisted world.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby seahorse » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 10:54:55

rwwf and Jack

I agree that "Might" always determines the current condition - but as pointed out, that doesn't mean it was used for "right." I hope that might, be it controlled by the majority or minority (military) is used for good of all - Bushido. If might is not used for "right" then killing the "few" is warranted to save the many - thus the saying that the sword is the giver of life. Three great books for any interested are "Soul of the Samuari", "Code of the Samuari" and "Book of the Tao."
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 16:45:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', 'A')s for the present workforce "depending heavily on the illegal workforce", Mr. Peter Brimelow along with many others, including myself call bs on that fiction. Hell, even the Keynsian crusader, Bob Samuelson sees clear through the workforce shibboleths.


I'm not an expert in this, but I still remember when the Major of NY said that if illegal immigrants were evicted the economy of NY would collapse in no time. Why would he say that then?
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Jack » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 20:51:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'N')o, they will *never* be replaced. Tell that to a mother that lost her baby. Should she get pregnant again to make a relacement? We are not machines; we're human beings.

*Every* human life is a treasure. *Every* *single* life is sacred, and it will always be, whether you accept it or not. You do not "own" the truth Jack, eventhough you speak as if you did.


You speak of the team dynamics of war, in which some cheers for nukes and others applaud suicide bombers. That’s the way people are – tribal. It matters not whether the two sides engage in a sporting event or a war. Cheering those one identifies with is amusing. You cheer your side, and they cheer their team; it’s all good, clean fun. Injuries and deaths stimulate the emotions, making the events more engaging to those involved. People love high casualties – on the other side; and sometimes, on their own side as well. It’s always been that way. I suspect it will remain thus.

I see that you assert that every human life is a treasure, and sacred. Surely, you don’t believe that. Our various societies do not, if we are to judge their attitudes by their actions. If one is sick, someone somewhere decides how much medical care to provide; or, they end care. If disaster strikes, those judged more valuable will receive aid; others will not. Even among individuals, we see a refutation of your premise. Largely, we simply do not care about the privations of others; especially those not part of our particular tribe. This evening, some child will starve to death. An adult will succumb to despair and opt for suicide. Murder will occur. We do not even know of their passing. Except for a limited immediate circle, no one cares.

The mother that lost her baby will weep and cry, and go through the traditional drama. If she wants a replacement, she knows the procedure. The loss of the child is of significance to only a few – in this case the mother, and perhaps the father. For the woman’s society, the dead child is a statistic. For the world, it is even less.

You make the claim that I have never been in various situations. You know only what you have seen me post. You assume; we know what assumptions do.

I notice the following statement: “*every* single life that was lost through these war crimes matters.” War crimes are a recent legal construct, properly relegated to whatever trash receptacle we use for absurdities. Those on the losing side seem remarkably fond of howling about war crimes. The winners know the costumed buffoons of the Hague command no divisions. However, since you contend that each individual life matters, you must surely deplore Hezbollah’s violation of international law in which they kidnapped two Israeli soldiers. In addition – since every life matters and is sacred – the Israelis are justified in doing whatever seems best to recover their kidnapped compatriots. If you argue that each life is sacred (whatever that means), you impeach your own arguments against Israel.

Finally, you mention southern Lebanon. Once again, I shall remind you that if one cannot drive out, one should walk out. Those unable to do so are expendable. At least, their families and fellow Lebanese have decided that – for they abandoned them. It seems your fellow Lebanese don’t perceive those lives as valuable or sacred. As for leaving a country, having visas, and all the other legal niceties – try thinking more creatively. Corruption is endemic in the world; one can use it to one’s advantage. As a friend and associate out-of-the-box thinker once said: “I love the poor. It’s cheaper to buy ‘em; and, they’re grateful.” Government officials in many areas of the world are poor. I leave it to you to connect the facts.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Jack » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 20:58:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')I'm not an expert in this, but I still remember when the Major of NY said that if illegal immigrants were evicted the economy of NY would collapse in no time. Why would he say that then?


Because he subscribes to the theory that the greatest economic activity and benefit results from lower prices to consumers. Since illegals tend to force wages down, there is an assumption that consumer prices will likewise be suppressed.

On the other hand, it may be that consumers reap little benefit; rather, corporations enjoy increased profit margins. It is understandable that the mayor would advocate a path he believes is pro-business.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby robski » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 21:20:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever, since you contend that each individual life matters, you must surely deplore Hezbollah’s violation of international law in which they kidnapped two Israeli soldiers. In addition – since every life matters and is sacred – the Israelis are justified in doing whatever seems best to recover their kidnapped compatriots. If you argue that each life is sacred (whatever that means), you impeach your own arguments against Israel.


Jack, you talk about people making assumptions, yet you assume that the Israeli soldiers were really kidnapped in Israel, rather than being captured in Lebanon.
User avatar
robski
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue 06 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Jack » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 22:44:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('robski', 'J')ack, you talk about people making assumptions, yet you assume that the Israeli soldiers were really kidnapped in Israel, rather than being captured in Lebanon.


Good point. That said, if one regards all life as sacred, it doesn't make much difference what they were doing or where they were.

If one rejects the "all life is sacred" viewpoint, then the soldiers' location becomes more of an issue.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 07:19:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', ' ')Injuries and deaths stimulate the emotions, making the events more engaging to those involved. People love high casualties – on the other side; and sometimes, on their own side as well. It’s always been that way. I suspect it will remain thus..


No, we're not all like you. Most of us cringe at high casualties. I personally can't sleep at night thinking of the suffering of Lebanese.

And no, I'm not cheering for Hisballah to kill more Israeli civilians, but I'd love for them to kick the IDF out of our country once and for all. Civilians have nothing to do with the war, so *no* civilian, Israeli or not, should be involved in this.

I have little sympathy for the 80% of Israelis who support the current atacks in Lebanon, but I don't wish any of them becomes a casualty. They're probably as brainwashed as Americans. They've been made to believe that they're in great danger and that this is their only way to survive, which is BS.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') see that you assert that every human life is a treasure, and sacred. Surely, you don’t believe that.


How do you know? You have psychic powers too?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he mother that lost her baby will weep and cry, and go through the traditional drama. If she wants a replacement, she knows the procedure. The loss of the child is of significance to only a few – in this case the mother, and perhaps the father. For the woman’s society, the dead child is a statistic. For the world, it is even less.


No. I cringe for every mother who lost her baby, regardless of whether she's my family or whether she's Lebanese. If you're a psychopath, that doesn't make most of us psychopaths.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou make the claim that I have never been in various situations. You know only what you have seen me post. You assume; we know what assumptions do.


I'm judging from your unrealistic suggestions as to how people should behave in the current situation in Lebanon. You're not in this situation, so you can't judge. I know you love playing the strategist and the computer soldier, but this is not a chess game or a videogame; this is life, and people are suffering while you crack your jokes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever, since you contend that each individual life matters, you must surely deplore Hezbollah’s violation of international law in which they kidnapped two Israeli soldiers.

The soldiers were abducted during combat, and thousands of Lebanese are jailed in Israel without a fair trial, including many minors.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n addition – since every life matters and is sacred – the Israelis are justified in doing whatever seems best to recover their kidnapped compatriots. If you argue that each life is sacred (whatever that means), you impeach your own arguments against Israel.

These statements make no sense whatsoever. The soldiers should certainly not be slaughtered or tortured, but if their lives matter, that doesn't give the IDF the right to kill 1000 people. They could simply negotiate and get their two soldiers back. That's the way to behave if one goes by the principle that everyone's life is sacred.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')inally, you mention southern Lebanon. Once again, I shall remind you that if one cannot drive out, one should walk out.

And risk being hit by planes throwing bombs?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hose unable to do so are expendable. At least, their families and fellow Lebanese have decided that – for they abandoned them.

How do you know that? You assume families don't come back for their relatives. You trivialize the work of awesome people like the Lebanese Red Cross personnel that are risking their lives to save others.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')overnment officials in many areas of the world are poor. I leave it to you to connect the facts.

Government officials in Lebanon are not poor. All the opposite; If anyone has money here, it's them. Embassy officials are certainly not poor or corrupt.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Jack » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 07:54:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')Government officials in Lebanon are not poor. All the opposite; If anyone has money here, it's them. Embassy officials are certainly not poor or corrupt.


The embassy officials probably aren't poor; as for whether they are corrupt...well... :lol:

If you can't find any poor officials at all, then I must point out to you that millions of Mexicans find it possible to live and work in the U.S. illegally. Within their actions is a lesson, don't you think?
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 08:08:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')Government officials in Lebanon are not poor. All the opposite; If anyone has money here, it's them. Embassy officials are certainly not poor or corrupt.


The embassy officials probably aren't poor; as for whether they are corrupt...well... :lol:

If you can't find any poor officials at all, then I must point out to you that millions of Mexicans find it possible to live and work in the U.S. illegally. Within their actions is a lesson, don't you think?


What does that have to do with Lebanese officials in the midst of a war that has blocked airports and sea ports? I can tell you have a rich imagination. You should use it to write fiction, not to argue about situations you know nothing about.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Jack » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 12:40:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')What does that have to do with Lebanese officials in the midst of a war that has blocked airports and sea ports? I can tell you have a rich imagination. You should use it to write fiction, not to argue about situations you know nothing about.


You resort to labels, hyperbole, and unfounded speculation. Our exchange here tells me that there is much you do not understand; worse - far worse - you do not realize the depth of your lack of understanding.

I am confident that Lebanon will have more excitement in the years ahead. This will give you some marvelous opportunities to learn.

As for those trapped in southern Lebanon - it is interesting that their families abandoned them. As I mentioned earlier, no one cares about them. No doubt that is a painful realization for them.
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby nwildmand » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 12:58:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')What does that have to do with Lebanese officials in the midst of a war that has blocked airports and sea ports? I can tell you have a rich imagination. You should use it to write fiction, not to argue about situations you know nothing about.


You resort to labels, hyperbole, and unfounded speculation. Our exchange here tells me that there is much you do not understand; worse - far worse - you do not realize the depth of your lack of understanding.


not only that but she makes broad generalizations about americans then slams me for being prejudice. pot meet kettle.

every time she gets caught saying something damaging to her credibility here, she retracts her statement and says she was just kidding.

its just to much like arguing with a brick wall.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 13:01:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'Y')ou resort to labels, hyperbole, and unfounded speculation. Our exchange here tells me that there is much you do not understand; worse - far worse - you do not realize the depth of your lack of understanding.


Our exchange tells me that you have little regard for human life or the feelings of others, that you meet the criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder, that you enjoy attention too much for your own good and you resort to provocation to get as much of it as possible, that you love playing the soldier and the strategist from your computer as many other chicken hawks around here, that you're an expert in vulgar sarcasm and cynicism, and that you're so arrogant that you think you're God and you own the truth just because you know some stuff about "Peak Oil".
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby nwildmand » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 13:33:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'Y')ou resort to labels, hyperbole, and unfounded speculation. Our exchange here tells me that there is much you do not understand; worse - far worse - you do not realize the depth of your lack of understanding.


Our exchange tells me that you have little regard for human life or the feelings of others, that you're an expert in vulgar sarcasm and cynicism, .


did you figure that out all by yourself? wow, you should be proud of yourself.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 13:37:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nwildmand', 'n')ot only that but she makes broad generalizations about americans then slams me for being prejudice. pot meet kettle.


That's a very interesting assertion indeed, considering that:

1-I've pointed several times that I have many American friends, that there are many things I like about the US, and that I think there are many decent American left, something that a few *American* posters in this forum disagree with.

2-I usually use the adjective *many* before making any claims, precisely because I'm educated enough to know that generalizations are typical prejudiced faulty reasoning.

3-When I do refer to "Americans" as a general noun, I'm criticizing those things that are pretty common in American society, such as their ignorance about foreign affairs. However, most Americans recognize that themselves, and I certainly never affirmed nor will I ever affirm that all or most Americans are like that.

You, however, are a self-proclaimed prejudiced person. I guess no one has brought the news to you yet that "prejudiced" means ignorant.

Not to mention that no poster here has ever called me prejudiced, whereas one person clearly called you a racist bigot. Here are his words in response to your educated "Muslim Gang Rape" thread:

Venky wrote: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]The poster who started this thread is a racist and a bigot, period. He basically just takes a few horror stories (which miki rightly pointed out is useless without statistical analysis) and uses that to justify all his hatred and bigotry, including the horrors of the current Israeli strike on Lebanon.


If I was you, I would take good note of that and try to get more educated about Muslims and Islam. It would certainly do you good to get better educated.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Jack » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 14:56:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'Y')ou resort to labels, hyperbole, and unfounded speculation. Our exchange here tells me that there is much you do not understand; worse - far worse - you do not realize the depth of your lack of understanding.


Our exchange tells me that you have little regard for human life or the feelings of others,


It took you this long to realize that? Miki, I'm disappointed in you.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
') that you meet the criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder,


Amateur pop-psychology at its finest! Utterly untrue, but amusing.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')that you enjoy attention too much for your own good and you resort to provocation to get as much of it as possible,


Umm? And who has one of the highest posting rates around? (You!). Who argues long and loud with one and all? (You, Miki!). Who labels others with gay abandon? Once again, you do!

So, since you seem to enjoy the amateur psychology game, perhaps I can play too. Are you merely externalizing your own dysfunctions? Perceiving symptoms in others when in fact you exhibit those same symptoms?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')that you love playing the soldier and the strategist from your computer as many other chicken hawks around here,


More labels I see. All applied while ignoring the central issues. You do realize this suggests that your arguments lack merit?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')that you're an expert in vulgar sarcasm and cynicism, and


Why, thank you! What delightful compliments.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', '
')that you're so arrogant that you think you're God and you own the truth just because you know some stuff about "Peak Oil".

Nah. If I were God, reality would be edited in a variety of ways. 8)

I note that you still have not addressed the central point:

There are, per your statements, 250,000 Lebanese in southern Lebanon. The implication is that they're not happy.

I keep offering the premise that they should start walking north and get out of danger. If they're unfit, it seems that their family, friends, and neighbors would help them. After all, the river is only 18 miles from the border - thus, the mean distance would be a mere 9 miles.

If the reasonably fit won't walk 10 miles (over the course of weeks!), what should I conclude about their cognition? If the unfit aren't helped to go those 10 miles, what should I think about the valuation placed upon their lives?

Bottom line - their families don't care about them.

If you wish to refute the premise, you'd be more effective if you concentrated on the issues at hand instead of tossing labels about.

Otherwise, I shall assume your software tools consist of:

public void GenLabel(int x){
for(int i=0;i<x;i++)
System.out.println("Jack is a " + getRandLabel());
}

:lol:
Dieoff. Fun to watch. Better with hot buttered popcorn! [smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: August 22 (From WSJ - opinion journal

Unread postby Miki » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 15:19:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', 'A')mateur pop-psychology at its finest! Utterly untrue, but amusing.

So, since you seem to enjoy the amateur psychology game, perhaps I can play too. Are you merely externalizing your own dysfunctions? Perceiving symptoms in others when in fact you exhibit those same symptoms?


I am a Psychology major Jack. I've worked as a research assistant in Clinical Psychology for years, so I know quite a bit about scientific research in this area. I'm not precisely speaking pop Psych and I'm far from being an amateur in this.

You're more than invited to check the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders latest edition (DSM-IV) for the diagnostic criteria for Antisocial Personality Disorder and corroborate for yourself that you meet the criteria. Or you can get a formal diagnostic assessment by a psychiatrist. Whichever you choose.

As for your claim above, it is a defense mechanism that Freud called projection, and your answer is: no, I'm not projecting my limitations on you. I'm just pointing out yours, given that you insist on playing the smart ass in spite of the sensitivity of this issue. I certainly have quite a bit of limitations, but a diregard for human life, a cynical attitude, and a narcissitic attention-seeking nature are not among them.

As for the Southern Lebanese, I'm not interested in your evacuation tips. Save them for the next terrorist atack in the US, which is right around the corner.
Last edited by Miki on Sun 13 Aug 2006, 15:28:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Miki
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 969
Joined: Fri 21 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests