Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Unread postby Omnitir » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 19:55:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')You don't just have to shrink the car, you have to shrink the rest of it too.

Of course, and that is what will happen, is happening.

The two biggest wastes of resources are in manufacturing and in transport. Both of these areas have huge amounts of room for improvement. Dramatic increases in efficiency in manufacturing cars (and everything else) and in operating cars will go a very long way. Long enough to make a transition completely away from fossil fuels.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under

Re: Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 31 Jul 2006, 20:44:06

That is not what's happening, Omnitir. Suburban sprawl has grown by leaps and bounds this year, last year, the year before it . . .
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Unread postby Omnitir » Tue 01 Aug 2006, 20:20:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')hat is not what's happening, Omnitir. Suburban sprawl has grown by leaps and bounds this year, last year, the year before it . . .

It is happening, it’s just not something discussed as much as sprawl or transport.

As I pointed out, the biggest consumer of energy is industry, which is an area with massive potential for efficiency increases. And just as there is a growing push for increased efficiency in the transport sector driven by economic factors, there is also a growing push for increased efficiency in the industrial sector driven by economic factors. Large increases in the way cars and other products are manufactured, which is absolutely achievable, will greatly reduce total oil consumption.

As car manufacturers are striving to produce more fuel efficient vehicles, they are also striving to reduce energy consumption in the manufacturing process through improved manufacturing techniques and technologies.

This is how the entire system is shrinking, and this is far more important then sprawl (which consumes a fraction of the energy that could be saved in the industrial sector).
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.
User avatar
Omnitir
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat 02 Apr 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Down Under

Re: Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Unread postby dub_scratch » Wed 02 Aug 2006, 13:36:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Omnitir', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')hat is not what's happening, Omnitir. Suburban sprawl has grown by leaps and bounds this year, last year, the year before it . . .

It is happening, it’s just not something discussed as much as sprawl or transport.

As I pointed out, the biggest consumer of energy is industry, which is an area with massive potential for efficiency increases. And just as there is a growing push for increased efficiency in the transport sector driven by economic factors, there is also a growing push for increased efficiency in the industrial sector driven by economic factors. Large increases in the way cars and other products are manufactured, which is absolutely achievable, will greatly reduce total oil consumption.

As car manufacturers are striving to produce more fuel efficient vehicles, they are also striving to reduce energy consumption in the manufacturing process through improved manufacturing techniques and technologies.


The above statement exposes the sheer folly in auto fuel economy and demonstrates why incremental energy efficiency has never lowered energy consumption and will never solve anything as far as the oil crisis and suburbia is concerned. The fact that you have to manufacture your way into a high MPG fleet means that it is inherently slow, costly and ironically takes shitloads of energy before you ever get there. Imagine, in order to turnover the fleet, you have to keep traffic jammed with single-loaded cars & SUVs for decades. The system clearly does not have decades of cheap oil to do that, and if it did there is every reason to think the car buying public would continue to skip the hybrids and go for the Hummers.

I will submit to you my prediction that we will see energy efficiency in the realm of the motoring system. It will all come from drastic reductions in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and not from anything but a tiny number of cars being sold. This is systemic energy efficiency-- energy efficiency from the system as a whole-- as opposed to incremental energy efficiency which is expressed in the focus on MPG.

Incidentally, the best way to improve average MPG within the average mile driven is curtailment of VMT. My Audi gets 25 MPG in typical LA clogged traffic but does 36 MPG when the highways are clear. And if the curtailment of miles driven is delegated to the least efficient cars in the overall fleet, then the average MPG of the cars driven could go up dramatically. There is every reason to expect the gas pigs would be driven less in a fuel scarce world.

It is hard to predict and measure the size of the fuel economy "bonus" that will come when we decide not to be a motoring nation. But my guess is that we could see a 10-15 MPG improvement.......And all without manufacturing anything.

Itza slam-dunk.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')This is how the entire system is shrinking, and this is far more important then sprawl (which consumes a fraction of the energy that could be saved in the industrial sector).


America's almost uniform urban layout has made our oil consumption double that of Western Europe and Japan. Sprawl will have to be reformed to some degree in order to make a low VMT world viable. It can be done.
dub_scratch
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Top

Re: Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Unread postby Heineken » Wed 02 Aug 2006, 14:12:27

I agree with dub_scratch that mileage increases won't get us out of the corner we've painted ourselves into.

US people would probably respond to better mileage by driving more. Also, the vast suburban infrastructure, a kind of universe in its eternity, would continue to grow daily, offsetting putative gains achieved through better efficiency.

As long as "growth" continues, the situation gets worse.

The only hope lies in radically changing the infrastructure. Small, self-sufficient towns where people walk and ride bicycles, surrounded by organic farms, cottage industries, and parks, surrounded in turn by wilderness. And the towns connected by railroads, not freeways.

There is NO other rational arrangement.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Automotive X-Prize site online - affordable 250mpg car

Unread postby dub_scratch » Wed 02 Aug 2006, 15:46:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')The only hope lies in radically changing the infrastructure. Small, self-sufficient towns where people walk and ride bicycles, surrounded by organic farms, cottage industries, and parks, surrounded in turn by wilderness. And the towns connected by railroads, not freeways.

There is NO other rational arrangement.


Thanks Heineken, for offering reason to this debate.

What you briefly outlined is what I like to call "systemic energy efficiency". We can also think of it as working smarter-- not harder. If we have urban structures that don't require so much transportation, then the whole system cannot help but be energy efficient.

Contrast that with the popular focus on improved MPG, or what I like to call "incremental energy efficiency". It takes a whole lot of energy just to get there, but even if you could wave the magic wand and turn all the cars into 50 MPG Prius', you still would be left with huge amounts of dependence on auto transport against a backdrop of declining fossil fuels. In 10 to 20 years you'd be back where you were, having to reinvent the whole world all over again. But that's the good news. The bad news is that high MPG cars will only inspire more cars and more sprawl (a.k.a. Jevons' Paradox). Incremental energy efficiency does not nessesarily give us systemic energy efficiency. It usualy give us the opposite.

We should pray for the affordable 250mpg car to never happen.
dub_scratch
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Top

Previous

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron