by Gorm » Thu 27 Jul 2006, 19:05:04
If a military aircraft bombs civilians intentionally, that is within the concept of war, and for that there is intrenatonally rules.
If someone blows up a military truck disgiused as a civilian, they are considered spies, infiltrators or terorrist, and for them, there are no rules.
If a nation is attaced from another nation, it is, in act, a declaration of war. Israel was attaced from lebanon. The lebanese army and goverment showed no ability to stop the attacks but still clamied sumpremacy over the area, and therefore Israel was at war with Lebanon. Not formally but practically. They chose to deal with the situation according to the ruels of war.
If israel had responded by plcacing out carboms, sending in sucidebombers dressed as mullas blowing themselfs up in mosks, and stuff like that, yes, they would have been terrorists.
One migth think that killing civlians when the enemy fighters disgiues among them and are hiding among them is wrong. I do not agree. The fault is on the behalf of those who uses civilans as shielding. And when the civilans helps to hide them, they are no loger cilvilans, no matter what.