by Miki » Thu 27 Jul 2006, 06:21:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')True, I had a hard time finding any photos of widespread damage (most showing great detail at a small scale), much less an overview. It would be nice if we found such an image from a neutral source, though...
Honestly, I don't see the point of finding such a map. I don't see what Jack's point is either.
The areas of destruction are mostly concentrated in the South of Lebanon and Beirut. Does that render the damage negligible? Of course not. Suffice it to say that 1/3 of the Lebanese population have lost their home.
Also, if you look at a map of the South of Lebanon or of Beirut, you can see the widespread damage within those areas. If tomorrow Canada invaded the US and bombarded
half of NYC, would you find it acceptable or negligible damage just because it is half of one city? I don't think so.
And if so, why did Americans make a big fuss when 9/11 happened? The damage was
minimal, wasn't it?