Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Second Renaissance

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

When will a post-Peak Oil technological society re-emerge?

Earlier than 2050
14
No votes
2050-2100
14
No votes
2100-2250
21
No votes
2250-2500
1
No votes
2500-3000
0
0%
3000-5000
3
No votes
Later than 5000
3
No votes
 
Total votes : 56

Postby jato » Sun 07 Nov 2004, 17:19:11

Marco & gg3, great posts! A diamond in the rough considering most of this board currently engaged in a Bush bashing frenzy.

Nice scenario Marco. Just throw in a possibility of civil war or ww3 (or both at the same time) as variables. :?
jato
 

Postby TrueKaiser » Sun 07 Nov 2004, 17:21:09

correct me if i am worng but it sounds like you are saying it might return to the old city state kind of life?
User avatar
TrueKaiser
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby gg3 » Sun 07 Nov 2004, 21:58:08

Jato, thanks:-).

Kaiser, somewhat:-)

Nation-states might survive as such, but in a stripped down form of the kind that might warm an extreme libertarian's heart:-). Personally I have a strong attachment to the idea of the *United* States of America, and a breakdown of our central government would make us a tasty target for any of a number of enemies.

It's not very well known, but apparently Oregon passed a legal secession amendment -making it an independent country- a short time before Pearl Harbor. And un-passed it the day after Pearl Harbor. I take that as a very interesting lesson.

That being said, localism will necessarily have to re-emerge as a factor of transport costs, and central authority will not have the financial means to maintain its presence as universally as it currently does. Now here we have to exercise caution in forecasting, because the mythos of the Western Frontier is still recent in our history. But the strong likelihood remains, of something like what I described, whether formally or informally. And also, keep in mind that there are remote rural areas in the US right now that are de-facto similar in certain important ways. We might do well to study those cases so we can learn from their strengths and as importantly, learn from their downsides.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Postby TrueKaiser » Sun 07 Nov 2004, 22:39:24

i would kind of call my self liberal. some of my views match theres. but i do not look forward to the return of city states.. it is basicly the other extreme compared to what is happening now.
User avatar
TrueKaiser
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby smallpoxgirl » Wed 10 Nov 2004, 23:01:31

I strongly disagree with your portrayals of pre-industrial life. The invasion of the Americas by Europeans contrasts these two ways of life sharply. Despite facing 400 years of continuous genocide, Indian peoples fought courageously against impossible odds to maintain their way of life. After centuries of war. After loosing 99% of their land and seeing 99% of their people killed. After being placed in concentration camps and starved to the edge of death. After being robbed of self governance and being forced away from their tradition of comunally holding land. After seeing every single binding treaty they signed with the Americans violated. After all that, the Indians still didn't choose the white way. It was only once the government starting kidnapping Indian children and forcing them into boarding schools. Cutting off their hair. Beating them for practicing their religion or speaking their own language. Only when those boarding school children grew up, did Indians covert from their "nasty, brutal" ways and see the value of civilization.

Read Columbus's accounts of how genorous the Indians were. How kind. What good slaves they would make. Then read the accounts of his soldiers tying Indians down and slowly roasting their hands or feet over a fire. Cutting out their tongues to quiet them. Keeping half an Indian carass hanging on the porch to cut off piece by piece to feed the dogs. Read about the Spanish navagating from island to island in the Caribean by following the trail of dead Indians in the water. Read the accounts from the beginning of the first Puritan Conquest when the Indian warriors asked incredulously of the "civilized" Puritans, "Do you kill women and children?" The answer "You shall soon see". Read how the English popularized scalping because they considered it so much more efficient than their previous practice of collecting whole heads as they had done during their invasions of Ireland. Read about the bounties on Indian scalps that persisted in some states into the 1900's. Read about Colonel John Chivington's 1863 killing of two hundred Cheyennes who had allied themselves with the US. Read about how his soldiers cut off the women's breasts and played catch with them. Read about how they cut off the women's genitals and used them as hat decorations. Read his rousing call to murder Indian children. "Kill and scalp all, big and little; nits make lice" Visit the Capitol in Denver today and you will see a statue on the front steps honoring John Chivington and his men. Read about the death march of the Cherokee on the Trail of Tears. Read about the death march of the Dine (Navaho) on The Long Walk to Bosque Redondo. Read about the 18 Congressional Medals of Honor awarded to the seventh cavalry for using Gatlin Guns to mow down 350 unarmed Lakota's at Wounded Knee. Thier crime? Practicing a religious ceremony forbiden by the government. Watch Madeline Albright on 60 Minutes deffending the adminstrations decision to starve to death 500,000 Iraqi children. Read about the 4 million Vietanmese murdered to prevent some dominos from falling. Read Zbigniew Brzezinsk words when asked whether he regreted working under Jimmy Carter to intentionally instigate the Russo-Afgan war, costing 2 million Afganis thier lives: "Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it?" Think about these things, and then ask yourself how loving and kind "civilized" people are and how nasty and brutish pre-industrial people are.

One of Hitler's rules of propaganda was to find the most indeffensible thing you are doing and to loudly and repeatedly accuse your enemy of doing it. Of course most "civilized" authorities accuse pre-industrial people of being brutal "savages". They accuse Indians of scalping and being decietful. Of course George Bush accuses Sadam of spreading terror and of having weapons of mass destruction. It makes for good propaganda. The best defense is a good offense.

As far as I can see violence never decreased under industrial societies. It became larger, more blatant, and more sanitary. More industrial if you will. People got better at lying to themselves about it. Burying thier heads in the sand. As far as I'm concerned civilization is a death trap, and it can't end soon enough.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Postby jato » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 03:20:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hink about these things, and then ask yourself how loving and kind "civilized" people are and how nasty and brutish pre-industrial people are.


All people are capable of great atrocities. We here in the USA are currently fat, dumb and happy (so to speak). Take away the cheap energy, collapse the economy and see how much (more) evil we will become. We are not going to go gently into the night. None of the "aggressive" governments/countries will.

I am not down on the USA. I love the USA. I am down on people. Or in other words people let me down. Never underestimate the brutality of man.

The one idea the smart people here at PO.com often miss it is the human factor. I am talking about the dark side of human nature that has been proven by history time and time again. We will be lucky if many humans will survive through the next 100 years (ie more reason for die off).
jato
 

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 12:50:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', 'I') am not down on the USA. I love the USA. I am down on people. Or in other words people let me down. Never underestimate the brutality of man.


That would seem to be the point where you and I disagree. I think people are essentially good. In general, people are kind to eachother, one on one. This is especially true when they are living in small groups and develop relationships with eachother. They help eachother out. They care for eachother. It takes institutional organization and corupt systems of thought before they develop true brutality towards eachother. People will do things in the name of governments and in the name of churches in the name of consumerism that they would never concieve of doing on their own. When people turn off their own inate morality and start to trust the president or the reich's furer or the pope or the advertisers to be their morality, bad things happen.

The other instance where people turn off their own morality and do bad things is under the effects of intoxicating substances: alcohol, drugs, television, etc. Perhaps you are right in that Americans are so conditioned from a lifetime under the effects of mind controlling substances and corupt systems of thought that their inate senses of morality have irreversibly atrophied. When the television goes off, and the beer trucks stop running, and the talking heads in DC are silenced, I personally think people will find their moral center and will learn to live cooperatively and care for eachother again. [smilie=icon_rr.gif]
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Postby Freud » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 15:03:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I') strongly disagree with your portrayals of pre-industrial life. The invasion of the Americas by Europeans contrasts these two ways of life sharply. Despite facing 400 years of continuous genocide, Indian peoples fought courageously against impossible odds to maintain their way of life. After centuries of war. After loosing 99% of their land and seeing 99% of their people killed. After being placed in concentration camps and starved to the edge of death. After being robbed of self governance and being forced away from their tradition of comunally holding land. After seeing every single binding treaty they signed with the Americans violated. After all that, the Indians still didn't choose the white way. It was only once the government starting kidnapping Indian children and forcing them into boarding schools. Cutting off their hair. Beating them for practicing their religion or speaking their own language. Only when those boarding school children grew up, did Indians covert from their "nasty, brutal" ways and see the value of civilization.

Read Columbus's accounts of how genorous the Indians were. How kind. What good slaves they would make. Then read the accounts of his soldiers tying Indians down and slowly roasting their hands or feet over a fire. Cutting out their tongues to quiet them. Keeping half an Indian carass hanging on the porch to cut off piece by piece to feed the dogs. Read about the Spanish navagating from island to island in the Caribean by following the trail of dead Indians in the water. Read the accounts from the beginning of the first Puritan Conquest when the Indian warriors asked incredulously of the "civilized" Puritans, "Do you kill women and children?" The answer "You shall soon see". Read how the English popularized scalping because they considered it so much more efficient than their previous practice of collecting whole heads as they had done during their invasions of Ireland. Read about the bounties on Indian scalps that persisted in some states into the 1900's. Read about Colonel John Chivington's 1863 killing of two hundred Cheyennes who had allied themselves with the US. Read about how his soldiers cut off the women's breasts and played catch with them. Read about how they cut off the women's genitals and used them as hat decorations. Read his rousing call to murder Indian children. "Kill and scalp all, big and little; nits make lice" Visit the Capitol in Denver today and you will see a statue on the front steps honoring John Chivington and his men. Read about the death march of the Cherokee on the Trail of Tears. Read about the death march of the Dine (Navaho) on The Long Walk to Bosque Redondo. Read about the 18 Congressional Medals of Honor awarded to the seventh cavalry for using Gatlin Guns to mow down 350 unarmed Lakota's at Wounded Knee. Thier crime? Practicing a religious ceremony forbiden by the government. Watch Madeline Albright on 60 Minutes deffending the adminstrations decision to starve to death 500,000 Iraqi children. Read about the 4 million Vietanmese murdered to prevent some dominos from falling. Read Zbigniew Brzezinsk words when asked whether he regreted working under Jimmy Carter to intentionally instigate the Russo-Afgan war, costing 2 million Afganis thier lives: "Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it?" Think about these things, and then ask yourself how loving and kind "civilized" people are and how nasty and brutish pre-industrial people are.

One of Hitler's rules of propaganda was to find the most indeffensible thing you are doing and to loudly and repeatedly accuse your enemy of doing it. Of course most "civilized" authorities accuse pre-industrial people of being brutal "savages". They accuse Indians of scalping and being decietful. Of course George Bush accuses Sadam of spreading terror and of having weapons of mass destruction. It makes for good propaganda. The best defense is a good offense.

As far as I can see violence never decreased under industrial societies. It became larger, more blatant, and more sanitary. More industrial if you will. People got better at lying to themselves about it. Burying thier heads in the sand. As far as I'm concerned civilization is a death trap, and it can't end soon enough.


You're idealizing native american indians as a whole, a fair bit in your post and using it to bolster your distaste for the industrial world.

It's a misnomer to say "The Indians were peaceful" like it is to say "The French are wine swilling valentinos", or the "Russians blood thirsty hairy communists", or whatever.

All cultures have been barbaric on themselves and one another through this industrial age, and long long before transatlantic migration ever took place.

It doesn't make it right... but that's our nature.


There are plenty of accounts of certain Indian tribes of the northeast raping/pillaging/ and murdering the tribes they were at war with or had better resources worth taking.

Oral traditions hand down accounts of pre-europian times Manatawny (Delaware) getting into a squirmish and piking the heads of the fallen on spears along a mildly shallow tributary of the Delaware river as revenge for an unprovoked killing spree. Yeah the peaceful Delaware.....

Maybe they didn't have a tactical nuke to lob on to each other's villages, but the SHTF numerous times all around the pre-industrialised Americas. South America could have been considered gruesome by even todays standards of war, pre-industrialised SA.

Certain aboriginal tribes of Australia did the same.. and when a noted historian of Australia published a research paper documenting cannabalism in a few isolated times and locations for pre-industrialised Oz you should have seen the uproar he inadvertantly created amongst a society trained from childhood to feel mass guilt for their society and the industrialisation it brought. His name became dirt for the longest time. I wonder if he can even get a grant or interview anymore. I doubt it.


As for the possibilities for the future.... I'm sure that cold fusion all of the sudden becomes possible and viable just as the need forces that hand out.... the nanotech people will be building solar cells the size of needle tips, houses will be heated by geothermal pumps as a standard in colder climates, the X-challenge folks will have finally brought us the first nuclear powered space entry shuttles and interplanetary exploration/colonisation/ and mining will be where people invest their time energy and resources.

not to say that the transition and fighting amongst nations to prolong the time of change won't be the end of many of us... but we'll cope.

ancient man discovered fire... modern man will find it's own.

I for one can't wait to get off this planet and away from all the freaks... I probably won't in this lifetime, but the possibilities exist for my grandchildren and theirs. There's too many of us on this earth. Thats when wars start.
User avatar
Freud
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun 31 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby dhickerson » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 15:39:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'W')hen the television goes off, and the beer trucks stop running, and the talking heads in DC are silenced, I personally think people will find their moral center and will learn to live cooperatively and care for eachother again. [smilie=icon_rr.gif]

I'm all for the TV going off and shutting up the idiots in DC, but the beer trucks? Come on! What else do us poor amerian fools have to live for? I think I'm going to have to figure out how to brew my own, that would at least be a skill that post PO americans might have some interest in paying for!
User avatar
dhickerson
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Ohio

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 17:24:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Freud', '
')You're idealizing native american indians as a whole, a fair bit in your post and using it to bolster your distaste for the industrial world.

It's a misnomer to say "The Indians were peaceful" like it is to say "The French are wine swilling valentinos", or the "Russians blood thirsty hairy communists", or whatever.

All cultures have been barbaric on themselves and one another through this industrial age, and long long before transatlantic migration ever took place.


I didn't say Indians were peaceful. Columbus did. Right before he exterminated several million of them.

I am not trying to idealize Indians. If it appears that way, it is because of the contrast with the sheer horrors brought by the European invasion. The Indians had thier squables. They fought. Some groups more frequently than others. Thier ideas of violence and the European version, though, look radically different. By the 1800's at least, it was fairly common for the Lakota to attack the Crows. These attacks would typically consist of a half dozen Lakota sneaking up on a Crow camp in the middle of the night, killing the guy gaurding the horses, and stealing all the horses. When the Europeans attacked an Indian tribe, they often waited until most of the men were away hunting and then they attacked the camp killing everyone they could find including women, children, and old people and then they burned the entire camp - food, tools, shelters...everything. It was a type of warfare and violence completely foreign to the Indians when the whites first arrived. The Indians, as I mentioned earlier, expressed utter disbelief that anyone could behave in such a way. This much is documented. It survives in the writings of the very Europeans who were doing it.

You seem to have some very concrete ideas about what life was like in the Americas before the invasion. I'm curious of your source. I've spent a good bit of time reading on this topic and I have yet to see much of anything knowledgable written about the pre-contact era. For example, how much of the inter-tribal conflict noted by observers in the 1700's and 1800's was due to Europeans crowding out Indians who then fought over territory, and how much was conflict that had always existed. No one really knows. The Indians at that time did not have written languages. Some things persist in the oral tradition but they can be hard to interpret. Even by the time the first settlers arrived here, many of the coastal tribes had been reduced to about 1/10th of their previous population due to diseases introduced by traders. In fact the only first hand account I know of that reflects very much on the pre-contact state of Indians is the accounts of Columbus himself. They are as I said above: How peacefully they live. How genorous they were. How they would give him anything he asked for. How everywhere he when they welcomed him. Fed him. Gave him gifts. How much of their time was spent in leisure. How kind they were to eachother. How they didn't consider their bodies shameful things to be hidden with clothes. And how he thought that all these atributes would make them wonderful as slaves. This was a description of one group of Indians...certainly not reflective of all Indians, and certainly not an unbiased observer, though given his later brutality to the same Indians, probably not an observer prone to unjustified praise either.

What I am saying is this. It is natural to look at our own lives and to assume that anything different is likely to be worse. We have been raised in brainwash schools that tell us ad nauseum how our rulers are only taking our freedom because they are protecting us. Even more Orwelian..we are taught that our curent state of bondage is really "freedom" and that our exploitative rulers are really just expressions of our own will. I think that a fair examination of history reveals that industrial civilization has brought primarily death, destruction, oppression, and drugery to the world. It has been resisted tooth and nail at every step of implementation by the people upon whom it was being implemented, and life without it is very likely to be more enjoyable, less brutal, less drearey, and to have a good deal more free time. To steal a phrase from the Shawshank Redemption, we've become "institutionalized". We're afraid to really be free.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Postby jato » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 17:55:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n general, people are kind to eachother, one on one. This is especially true when they are living in small groups and develop relationships with eachother. They help eachother out. They care for eachother. It takes institutional organization and corupt systems of thought before they develop true brutality towards eachother. People will do things in the name of governments and in the name of churches in the name of consumerism that they would never concieve of doing on their own.


Consider that most (or all?) religions, governments, etc. are systems of control. While these systems are not evil, evil men do make them corrupt.

Also consider it only takes a small group of aggressive/persuasive people to control/modify the behavior of a large group of people.

I would agree that small groups of primitives (native American Indians) were able to do less harm to their fellow man than the industrial "white man". However, I believe this is due to the Indians' sparse & scattered populations, lack of modern transportation, infrastructure, weaponry, etc. It is also due to the lack of a centralized government or other form of (centralized) control. It is not because they were "better" than other groups of men.
jato
 
Top

Postby backstop » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 17:55:41

Smallpoxgirl - Really fine posts from a perspective that's all too rare.

As ever, the neo-darwinists are slow to realize that their wild assertions slandering human nature are but what they've been trained to believe by a power stucture that has to try justify its own aggression.

I think you're quite right to suggest that with present propagandas removed people will have the chance of finding ways to get along with eachother, and co-operate for mutual benefit and respect.

regards,

Backstop
backstop
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Varies

Postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 11 Nov 2004, 22:13:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', '
')Consider that most (or all?) religions, governments, etc. are systems of control. While these systems are not evil, evil men do make them corrupt.

Also consider it only takes a small group of aggressive/persuasive people to control/modify the behavior of a large group of people.


All religions and governments that have evolved in industrial societies are systems of control. I would say that it is that very fact...that they are designed to control people...that makes them corrupt. And yes, these systems of control are very suceptible to being coopted by persuasive people to bad ends. This is exactly the problem. When you have a system where the shepard speaks and all the sheep toe right in line, it is very succeptible to being used for bad things. When you have a system where people take responsibility for their own actions. Where they decide for themselves whether what their leader is saying is right, or it is wrong, it is much more resitant to situations where people look back on some horrific action and say "What the heck were we thinking?"

It is a very pervasive concept in American Indian societies, and I suspect in most indigenous societies the world over, that they value respectfulness very highly but they do not value obediance. When Europeans have looked at Indian societies, they try to look at them through the mirror of their own experience. Coming from societies which were controlled by a single male leader, they have always sought to identify "the chief" when they have encountered Indians. There really wasn't *a* chief in most cases. There were a variety of chiefs. Chief was typically an ad hoc position. When a situation came up that needed leadership, they would select someone with a history of leadership and an expertise in that area to be chief. Because of the hostile relationship, the chief that the Europeans came to know was usually the war chief. In truth most tribes had several war chiefs, but the Europeans usually identified one they would talk to. The war chiefs were typically male which gives the typical European a very skewed view of gender relations amongst the Indians. In most tribes, for example, the elder women held the veto power on wether the tribe went to war. The chiefs held no dictatorial power. They came up with plans, and people either went with it, or they didn't. If they really didn't like one chief's plans, they would find a different chief. It wasn't a bloody coup. Usually they just ignored the old guy and listened to somebody new. If you read the history of the Indian wars, you will learn that even the most respected war chiefs were natoriously unable to control their warriors. Crazy Horse repeatedly devised some cunning trap to beat the blue coats only to have a few of the warriors blow the deal by attacking before they were supposed to.

So I think it's all about what your society is based around. Industrial societies are based around centralized control. Their governments support it. Their economies support it. Their religions support it. Their schools support it. Consequently they are good at centralized control. Indigenous societies are generally built around individual responsibility, self determination, respectfullness, generosity, and voluntary cooperation. Their governments followed those principles. Their religions were built around those principles. The resulting societies reflected those principles.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Postby jato » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 07:16:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Indigenous societies are generally built around individual responsibility, self determination, respectfullness, generosity, and voluntary cooperation.


Do you have a modern day example of the above quote?

I don't have enough information to counter your point. Therefore I don't necessarily disagree with you. However, I don’t understand how it plays into this thread. As you stated, indigenous people have been conquered/killed/assimilated by “industrial societyâ€
jato
 
Top

Postby Pops » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 12:09:18

Great thread. Welcome smallpoxgirl.

Regarding feudalism mentioned earlier in the thread.

In the past, the feudal “Landlordâ€
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Postby Freud » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 16:56:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '
')I didn't say Indians were peaceful. Columbus did. Right before he exterminated several million of them.


so because the initial south americans fell quickly, allowing columbus to march on the more militaristic cities and empires, which he wasn't able to take by force, but rather by accidental illness, you call that "extermination"??

"He" didn't exterminate them, though he would have tried regardless, just as the Aztecs shit on every one of their own neighbours.... he and his men killed very little of those "several million".... Disease was the guilty party... way to selectively project your hate complex of modern mankind on such a silly example. :roll:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') am not trying to idealize Indians. If it appears that way, it is because of the contrast with the sheer horrors brought by the European invasion.


another red herring, you did it in your first remark, and you've done it again in this quoted remark here.... "sheer horrors".... war is horror, baby... so is life... Let's talk about the "sheer horrors" of the spanish influenza "invasion" during the world war one period.... deadly it was.. Yet you'd ignore the millions whom died from all walks of life around the globe because something more powerful than humanity killed, and focus on a hapless Spanish dickhead looking for fame and fortune.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Indians had thier squables. They fought. Some groups more frequently than others. Thier ideas of violence and the European version, though, look radically different.


aside from counting coup, how is death waged with whatever available tools different from modernized warfare with whatever available tools?

so what? You've got issues and a smidgeon of native blood to stew over.. convenient........

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y the 1800's at least, it was fairly common for the Lakota to attack the Crows. These attacks would typically consist of a half dozen Lakota sneaking up on a Crow camp in the middle of the night, killing the guy gaurding the horses, and stealing all the horses. When the Europeans attacked an Indian tribe, they often waited until most of the men were away hunting and then they attacked the camp killing everyone they could find including women, children, and old people and then they burned the entire camp - food, tools, shelters...everything. It was a type of warfare and violence completely foreign to the Indians when the whites first arrived.


so people weren't sacrificed to deitys, eaten, tortured, raped, and generally killed?

Stop using the "Indians" and state the truth... "tribes".... certain "tribes" were peaceful at times, some were violent, some cruel and vindictive by our modern standards, some utopian pipe dreams, some extinct by their own hand.

Unless every one of your ancestors formed a rape congo line from the tip of Chile to the North Pole and you're the logical outcome, you've got little room broadly generalising natives of the americas as hard done by, or innocent. Even then..... it's not you.. in the modern world living the modern life.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Indians, as I mentioned earlier, expressed utter disbelief that anyone could behave in such a way. This much is documented. It survives in the writings of the very Europeans who were doing it.

The Indians... the indians..... the europeans.... ok, whatever.... :roll:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou seem to have some very concrete ideas about what life was like in the Americas before the invasion.

Um... yeah, I think they were human beings..nothing more or less.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m curious of your source. I've spent a good bit of time reading on this topic and I have yet to see much of anything knowledgable written about the pre-contact era.

What makes you able to gauge what's knowledgable for the pre-contact era...some tribal blood? Should everything I say be wrong if I don't have tribal blood in me? Am I allowed to even comment on such things? Do you have a time machine? And if you've gone back to find out the truth, did you leave a viral 20th century disease by accident? Would I be part of the mechanizeans of the future which "exterminated" a group of people because we're in the present? Would I feel guilty... would I teach my children to pretend a time period was utopic and group of people were innocent angels taken down by something immoral?

If you want evidence that humans were humans then as are now.... do a bit of reading and listen to the stories locals tell you about the areas you visit. It's a wealth of non apologetic info...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or example, how much of the inter-tribal conflict noted by observers in the 1700's and 1800's was due to Europeans crowding out Indians who then fought over territory, and how much was conflict that had always existed. No one really knows. The Indians at that time did not have written languages. Some things persist in the oral tradition but they can be hard to interpret.

In other words you don't believe that the tribes fought or all that much.... and you would refute claims otherwise because written language wasn't used, and you wouldn't like modern non ntaive man to interpret oral history past down through the generations.....

convenient. :roll:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven by the time the first settlers arrived here, many of the coastal tribes had been reduced to about 1/10th of their previous population due to diseases introduced by traders. In fact the only first hand account I know of that reflects very much on the pre-contact state of Indians is the accounts of Columbus himself. They are as I said above: How peacefully they live. How genorous they were. How they would give him anything he asked for. How everywhere he when they welcomed him. Fed him. Gave him gifts. How much of their time was spent in leisure. How kind they were to eachother. How they didn't consider their bodies shameful things to be hidden with clothes. And how he thought that all these atributes would make them wonderful as slaves. This was a description of one group of Indians...certainly not reflective of all Indians, and certainly not an unbiased observer, though given his later brutality to the same Indians, probably not an observer prone to unjustified praise either.

you're basing all of native america on one man's encounters with the carribbean, then backpeddling by saying it's "certainly not reflective of all"

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat I am saying is this. It is natural to look at our own lives and to assume that anything different is likely to be worse.

and what I'm saying is that it's human to look back and reminsce about bygone times thinking everything was better..... or that the future will improve. Life is as life does.....

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e have been raised in brainwash schools that tell us ad nauseum how our rulers are only taking our freedom because they are protecting us. Even more Orwelian..we are taught that our curent state of bondage is really "freedom" and that our exploitative rulers are really just expressions of our own will. I think that a fair examination of history reveals that industrial civilization has brought primarily death, destruction, oppression, and drugery to the world.

It's also brought life liberty medicine technology information science understanding enjoyment and options. Like the Aztecs weren't suppressing insurrections of it's forcibly conquered and governed, or other tribes of central south america offering up the unwilling virgins of other tribes as deity sacrifices to ensure rain and sun?

One could argue that isolated communal religion and mythology is just as cruel as anything else mankind has spawned, industry included.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t has been resisted tooth and nail at every step of implementation by the people upon whom it was being implemented, and life without it is very likely to be more enjoyable, less brutal, less drearey, and to have a good deal more free time. To steal a phrase from the Shawshank Redemption, we've become "institutionalized". We're afraid to really be free.

without the industrial revolution, you and your family as mine wouldn't be here to preach on our pulpits of self righteous indignation about the very process that created us.... this large population of rapidly advancing mankind.

By all means opt out and take the rose coloured version of history as your bible... but remember this.... your children will be thin and sickly, they'll live short back breaking mundane lives and they'll never have the means to question their environment or dream of the "what ifs".

They'll be beholden to very critical communal law/tribal parameters... told where they can live, what they can do, whom they can associate with, and what they can think.... not only by their communities but by an environment that doesn't care what lives, dies, flourishes, thinks, doesn't....

and "get busy living or get busy dying", if said in an unacceptable situation would be a treason... an unpermittable questioning of the society they live in.. their environment, their individual persons...


yet we're doing it here and engaging in a healthy multinational multifaceted debate. go figure
User avatar
Freud
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun 31 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby Guest » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 17:12:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', 'D')o you have a modern day example of the above quote?.


Well...As you mentioned..the few intact indigenous societies that still exist are all heavily under attack. I would say that the Zapatistas in Mexico probably constitute a modern day example of such a society. There are a fair number of indigenous peoples still clinging to the old way throughout Central and South America. The Uwa of Columbia are one such people who have come a bit into the spotlight from their dogged oposition to Occidental Petroleum. Frankly I am more knowledgable about the indigenous peoples of the current day United States than of those currently governing themselves. From what I've heard, the community that developed at Wounded Knee, SD during the 71 day siege back in 1973 looked a lot like that. I have been told by several veterans of that siege that being surrounded by government tanks, with machine gun bullets flying overhead, little food, and few supplies, hungry and scared to death...that those 71 days were the most free they have ever been.

There are also pieces of that tradition that exist in many Indian reservations today and in the hearts of many Indian people. Certainly those communities at stressed and frayed to the max, and the traditional values are strongly challenged by the boarding school legacy, and the legacies of genocide, displacement, and poverty.

The important thing...IMHO...is not just wether those values can directly confront industrialism and win. I think we all here probably agree that industrialism is a dying dinosaur. The question was...what will human societies look like after the death of industrialism. I contend that when the monster runs out of gas and can't controll the minutia of peoples lives 2000 miles away...when people in small communities have to depend on eachother and on the gifts of mother earth for their survival...they will develop societies and values and religions...that have the same basic principles that indigenous people have always had.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', 'M')ore importantly for me, what does your view of the future hold?


Short term. The calm. Then the storm. hardship, hunger, death.

Eventually I think people will once again find a place of balance with nature. They will learn to honor and care for eachother and the world. They will learn to exist in nature as a member of a community rather than as a bully trying to beat everyone up and steal their lunch money. They will focus their time and their efforts on things more relevant than the work-consume-repeat idiocy of today. They will honor the river, because the river brings salmon, and salmon feed them. And they will know what it means to be hungry. And that will make the salmon all the more sweet. They will honor the trees, because trees make shelter and shelter keeps them warm in the winter and dry in the rain. And it will be all the more important because they will know what it means to be cold. They will know what it means to face danger and to win. And yes..some will loose. But existence will be real, and at the end of the day they will be very tired...and they will sleep very soundly. And the children will laugh...and roll thier eyes when the old people talk of living in subdivisions and working in office buildings and eating at McDonalds...because the children will know that the old people are just telling stories and that no one would really be foolish enough to want to live like that. Even the old people won't be able to remember what trafic sounded like, or what it was like to look up and not be able to see the stars because of street lights...and they too will sometimes wonder if it wasn't just a story that they made up to scare the children.

In short...my people will live, as my people always have lived. My people are the Celts. And but for a brief interlude of perhaps 300 years, when we were stricken with the white man's gold madness, this is the way we have always lived. We are fierce warriors. And we will again live free. [smilie=brave.gif]
Guest
 
Top

Postby Freud » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 20:16:30

I'm going to be an arsehole...but an honest arsehole nevertheless....


Somebody just brought in more profiling into the mix....

The "Native American Indians" and now the "Celts"....

Cultures that have been placed on mythological pedestals and propped up by dodgy dream catchers and run of the mill tattoos...

The poor celts.... all their soltices and holidays turned into white man's religions......


And the emotionally advanced and proud peoples of the north american continent struck down by whitey's greed.


Celt myth is actually quite "barbaric" if you believe in that word.... I don't... I view the myths as oral stories of humans behaving like humans......


All we need is someone to chime in with the indigenous peoples of Australia and it's a wrap!


I'm really kind of confused, I've got at least 8 known bloods running through my veins... and probably triple that in unaccounted rapes, abductions, migrations, and one night stands.

I shall blame myself I suppose, then tell myself that my shit doesn't stink, set up a college grant function, and call myself racists every time I try to access it with mutt heritage.

Or I could not give two shits, and call myself and everyone around me a human being, nothing more, nothing else.


I swear to god...... I hope the public school systems of this world go first. :roll:
User avatar
Freud
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun 31 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Pops » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 20:23:58

Well good, we have another ideological argument to distract us from the current situation.

Whew, I thought we might have to face the future instead of reliving the past.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Postby smallpoxgirl » Fri 12 Nov 2004, 22:58:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Freud', '[')smilie=naka.gif] I'm going to be an arsehole..:


Freud, you are unleashing an awefull lot of rage here. What's up man? Here....have a seat on the couch. Tell the doctor about your childhood.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') I'm really kind of confused, I've got at least 8 known bloods running through my veins... and probably triple that in unaccounted rapes, abductions, migrations, and one night stands.


Is that the problem? Feelings of ethnic inferiority? My friend...you too are an indigenous person. You may have forgotten your ancesters, but they haven't forgotten you. They knew how to live on the earth without destroying it, and they would like to share that knowledge with you. [smilie=icon_flower.gif]
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron