Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Should we adopt the Fair Tax?

Yes
15
No votes
No
7
No votes
It hurts to think enough to decide
3
No votes
 
Total votes : 25

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby 128shot » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 02:30:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('128shot', 'T')his is true. The main problem with the Irish Famine was that it was caused by relying too much on one thing!


Sorry to shoot you down, but that's bull crap. The Irish were growing quite a diverse variety of foods. The English landlords were then taking that food and exporting it back to England. Only the potatoes were considered so lowly that the Irish were allowed to eat them. Ireland throughout the "famine" grew more than enough food to feed itself. The food was sent to England and the Irish starved. In fact there is good evidence that the system of only allowing Irish to keep the potatoes arose because the English landlords were scheming on how to reduce the Irish population and realized that if they were limited to one crop, that crop would eventually fail. The so called famine is better described by the 20th century word genocide.



Just a simple run on wikipedia disputes this "fact"


A good core of irish historians don't even call it a genocide, and thats just a basic wikipedia article.
User avatar
128shot
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Wed 18 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 03:11:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wikipedia', 'S')ome Irish, British and US historians...have long dismissed claims of a deliberate policy of extermination(emphasis in original)


Yes. A most thorough rebutal. If some historians think it was accidental or negligent policies of extermination but not an intentional policy of extermination then I obviously must be wrong. I'm sure you're right. It was just lazy Paddies too stupid to grow anything but potatoes.

If you want to pursue your education a bit further than Wikipedia, you might want to start with this from the New Jersey public high school Genocide and Holocaust Curriculum. Link

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')etween 1845 and 1850, more than a million Irish people starved to death while massive quantities of food were being exported from their country. A half million were evicted from their homes during the potato blight, and a million and a half emigrated to America, Britain and Australia, often on-board rotting, overcrowded "coffin ships". This is the story of how that immense tragedy came to pass.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')reland Before and After the Famine, author Cormac O’Grada documents that in 1845, a famine year in Ireland, 3,251,907 quarters (8 bushels = 1 quarter)) of corn were exported from Ireland to Britain. That same year, 257,257 sheep were exported to Britain. In 1846, another famine year, 480,827 swine, and 186,483 oxen were exported to Britain. (28.)

Cecil Woodham-Smith, considered the preeminent authority on the Irish Famine, wrote in The Great Hunger; Ireland 1845-1849 that, "...no issue has provoked so much anger or so embittered relations between the two countries (England and Ireland) as the indisputable fact that huge quantities of food were exported from Ireland to England throughout the period when the people of Ireland were dying of starvation." (29.)

"Although the potato crop failed, the country was still producing and exporting more than enough grain crops to feed the population. But that was a 'money crop' and not a 'food crop' and could not be interfered with." (30.)

...

Dr. Kinealy's research proves beyond a reasonable doubt that there was sufficient food in Ireland to prevent mass starvation, and that the food was brought through the worst famine-stricken areas on its way to England. British regiments guarded the ports and warehouses in Ireland to guarantee absentee landlords and commodity speculators their "free market" profits.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 03:52:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he so called famine is better described by the 20th century word genocide.


Or paddycide.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby Liamj » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 23:10:25

When does willful ignorance and knowing incompetence become deliberate malice, and is all ignorance willful? Do we have to each personally acknowledge the effects of depleted uranium or the loss of power & water on public health before collateral damage becomes genocide, or is a proportionate body count sufficient?

A jury of citizens from Armenia, Tibet, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Zimbabwe might be best to consider that one, rather than us, making excuses, at the pretty end of the pipe.
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby rogerhb » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 00:36:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Liamj', 'A') jury of citizens from Armenia, Tibet, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, and Zimbabwe might be best to consider that one, rather than us, making excuses, at the pretty end of the pipe.


Perhaps any society that thinks 42,000 road deaths per year is progress has such a low opinion on the value of life that they should be prohibited from making any decision other than which colour of plastic spoon to use.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby Liamj » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 07:55:42

Err, in an effort to rehabilitate the thread for Kevin (don't be shy lad),

I read so far some good old fashioned 'i hate taxes' reactions (duuh, dat road growed dere all by itself), some support but, and plenty of cynicism about any tax replacing another. How is replacement hardwired into the proposal you're keen on, Kev?
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Re: Fair Tax - Replace Income Tax with Sales Tax? Yes, or No

Unread postby Kevin_C » Sun 16 Jul 2006, 20:01:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Liamj', 'E')rr, in an effort to rehabilitate the thread for Kevin (don't be shy lad),

I read so far some good old fashioned 'i hate taxes' reactions (duuh, dat road growed dere all by itself), some support but, and plenty of cynicism about any tax replacing another. How is replacement hardwired into the proposal you're keen on, Kev?


I'm not shy, well not usually. Was away for a bit, then I left the thread alone when it went on its tangent. Although it was amusing to read.

I'm not actually sure what you are asking about replacement. So I'll just explain why replacement.

The goal is to reduce the massive bureaucracy on the government side that the government spends hundreds of millions on. The number of collection points would be greatly reduced as would the amount of money the IRS spends processing it.

Then we totally remove any bureaucracy on the tax payer side that isn't needed for fraud prevention. Reciets from new goods are the only signs of taxes that people deal with. The hundreds of millions that are spent per year arranging taxes stay in everyone's income instead.

The taxes cost of investing goes away. That should help encourage new investments.

Then there is the other idea on the subject. If you want to prevent something, tax it. Income tax prevent income. Taxes on investments prevent investments. On the other hand taxes on spending cause better spending habits.

As far as replacement goes, I would oppose this if it isn't total replacement. I don't like the idea that corporations would send the cost of the tax in the product to the consumer and then have a federal sales tax on top of that. It isn't a good idea.
User avatar
Kevin_C
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon 29 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests