by grabby » Wed 19 Jul 2006, 01:07:00
It doesn't really matter what caused the peak, wether physical or political, it is still the peak.
You can say "If only we had twice the wells , producing, the peak would have been higher. yes it would have been, but it isnt and it wasnt and it is still peak anyway.
. If politics reduced the expected flow, thn other fields are decreasing meanwhile, because of the political delay, thus making it unlikly the higher production would ever happen later, just a flatter prolonged top which is what we are seeing, but it is still peak.
So no matter what the cause of the decreased production, it will still be peak, because the majority of the other supporting wells are on the increasing downslope and the longer you go the less they produced.
I think the peak could have been higher, but do to social problems it wasn't
all that means is bigger shortages sooner.
If there were 5 million extra barrels of sweet crude a day produced by monrovia stating tomorrow, price of oil would drop to 25 dollars a barrel.
So we are short of our needs.
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer