Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Torture Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby eastbay » Wed 21 Jun 2006, 19:27:42

RG73,

It is not for the Iraqi resistance to end their resistance, it is for the US military to end their occupation.

It is very difficult for those of us sitting safely in our homes to even contemplate what can bring those resisting the occupation to such acts of barbarity.

But there is no arguing the fact that the root cause of the resistance and their increasing anger is the US occupation.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby eric_b » Wed 21 Jun 2006, 19:53:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', 'A')nd it's now becomming evident (obvious actually) that Saddam
was much more adept at holding the many factions in Iraq
together than the US will ever be.


Good point. Maybe the reason we removed him, worth considering....

(...)


Exactly. I've asserted this in the past. There's actually a lot of evidence
the US is indirectly supporting a lot of the shenanigans in iraq -
bombs, deathsquads, etc. It's an old 'COINTELPRO' divide and rule
tactic.

Then again, maybe not. Who knows.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby RdSnt » Wed 21 Jun 2006, 22:24:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fergus', 'T')ouchy subjext. I also agree were only there for 1 reason. Secure the oil fields. I dont know if the US will go all out and just take over the governments that hold oil, but I wager the US will engage Iran in a military conflict next, Then Venezuela or Russia????

Right or wrong, I dont know, I am not qualified for that. But I do think we have embarked on a path we can no longer turn around on. Wether we started it or not, the sleeping dog's now awake and if we dont fight there, its only a matter of time till that dog comes here and continues the jihad. While this is an oil war for us, it is survival for the jihadists and they are complelled to convert us or kill us. Its not that easy for them to just stop. Research the ideology behind the fanaticism. Its a deadly mandate laced with hate, murder and self importance.

Wether one wants this war or not, I think we have little choice left. We have to fight it till the bitter end. Can you imagine a weakened USA with Iran and Russia coupled with China's manpower all being pissed at the USA. We may have just painted our collective selves into a perverbial corner. At this point, we have to maintain a military superiority (or at least be equal in power) to the rest of the world. The bully has finally pissed off the whole school and they are ganging up on us. (Thats the way I see it anyways).



And just what kind of outcome do you expect from the "can't cut and run" scenario you've just defined?
As for the so called "jihadists" where do you think that hatred has come from? American and British international policy of subjugation
and interference.
If I come to your town and kick you out of your most precious places, take away your rights, reward the most corrupt among you, murder your family, how then can I react in shock when you get a bit upset.
They are compelled to drive you out, because you are there and murdering them with impunity.
Gravity is not a force, it is a boundary layer.
Everything is coincident.
Love: the state of suspended anticipation.
To get any appreciable distance from the Earth in
a sensible amount of time, you must lie.
User avatar
RdSnt
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby ohanian » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 09:07:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FairMaiden', '
')
I studied Islam for a VERY brief period but Jihad does NOT mean you convert or kill opposition. It means a "struggle" of faith which could be internal or external (the external could be military action). This is not a jihad...this is a country under occupation and attack. ANY country - whether it be dominated by Islamic or Christian religions - would have individuals who would fight for their freedom and their country should they find themselves under attack and occupation.

Think about it - who do you think they are trying to convert? The soldiers??


Greater G-hard : You must eliminate the influences of Shaitan from your body.

Lesser G-hard: You must eliminate the influences of Shaitan from this world.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby grabby » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 09:51:49

War is hell.
Peak oil is worse. What comes around goews around.
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby donshan » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 12:25:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('grabby', 'W')ar is hell.
.


"War is Hell" is a good short summary of the atrocities that always occur during wars.

During the British Conquest of India in the 1800s, British Forces fought the Muslim armies in Afghanistan. Rudyard Kipling accurately captured that bloody conflict in this poem:


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')When you're wounded and left on Afghanistan's plains, and the women come out to cut up what remains, jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains and go to your God like a soldier. "
Rudyard Kipling


The same sentiment existed in the US Calvary during the Indian wars in the US West:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')"Save the last bullet for yourself"


Bush should have anticipated the atrocities being committed by both sides in this war, before he started it.

War always finally ends with both sides losing.
An expert is someone who has made every mistake possible in their field and learned how to prevent them.
donshan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed 12 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State, USA
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby NiKfUrY69 » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 12:35:02

Lotsa pissy posts,

BUT I think we can all agree that this ain't the way it needs to be going. Whatever the reasons.

SO - how is the withdrawal to be implemented.

Impeachment ain't happenin'. Bet on that.

As long as politicians have ve$ted intere$t$ in companies making defense millions, how will they vote to withdraw?

Kinda like the gay marriage amendment - it hasn't got a chance of getting passed and they will play up their part in the proposal and vote.

At the end of the day - it still fails, troops are still there.

Realistic solutions wanted.... NiK
NiKfUrY69
 

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby NiKfUrY69 » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 12:37:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NiKfUrY69', 'A')s long as politicians have ve$ted intere$t$ in companies making defense millions, how will they vote to withdraw?

Kinda like the gay marriage amendment - it hasn't got a chance of getting passed and they will play up their part in the proposal and vote.

At the end of the day - it still fails, troops are still there.


Oh yeah, love it when I'm right.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ealistic solutions wanted.... NiK


Still - NiK
NiKfUrY69
 
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby SoothSayer » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 12:50:32

So what happens if we (the UK & the US) pull out?

That could mean:
- our political system is weakened
- a left-wing US government may take over
- our troops will be severely demoralised
- our people will feel cheated in various ways
- outside countries will view us as weak powers
- we lose a foothold in an oil rich area
- radical Islam will seize Iraq and probably more will die per day than at present
- we would probably lose our influence in Saudi Arabia too.

To summarise: We will end up separated from the oil areas, with a weak government and a dissillusioned army & populace. The US & UK probably could not mount a similar operation ever again. Pulling out could significantly threaten out future in the West.

Yep. Let's pull our troops out tomorrow. Might as well swallow cyanide whilst we are at it.

Image
Technology will save us!
User avatar
SoothSayer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby donshan » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 13:00:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NiKfUrY69', '
')
Realistic solutions wanted.... NiK


There are no "Realistic solutions" that are politically acceptable to Americans. We are like children that want their milk but want it produced without that smelly, dirty manure.

The fundamental problem is a century of Western interference in the MidEast because we need their cheap oil to sustain our energy guzzling lifestyle.

The "Realistic solution" is to immediately institute a fuel rationing system to reduce fuel demand so oil imports from all Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Emirates could be cut to zero within a few months. The economic and lifestyle "hardships" of such a rationing system, would change the political atmosphere in dozens of ways to create a "Realistic" energy program to adjust to reality- the petroleum age is over!

With immediate rationing, we don't need MidEast oil, we can immediately withdraw our troops and stop interfering in the internal affairs of these countries.

I read that Iran is preparing to institute petrol rationing about September to reduce internal fuel consumption to the amount that they refine domestically, so that they can do without the aprox. 30% of refinined fuels they now import. Seems to me they are now preparing for an oil conflict.

Why isn't America immediately doing something "Realistic" about our "addiction to oil" which is the root cause of the conflict? BTW, are financing BOTH sides of this conflict since some of the oil payments we make to MidEast oil coutries find their way to finance the insurgents.
Last edited by donshan on Thu 22 Jun 2006, 13:08:28, edited 1 time in total.
An expert is someone who has made every mistake possible in their field and learned how to prevent them.
donshan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed 12 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State, USA
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby NiKfUrY69 » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 13:04:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SoothSayer', 'S')o what happens if we (the UK & the US) pull out?

That could mean:
- our political system is weakened
- a left-wing US government may take over
- our troops will be severely demoralised
- our people will feel cheated in various ways
- outside countries will view us as weak powers
- we lose a foothold in an oil rich area
- radical Islam will seize Iraq and probably more will die per day than at present
- we would probably lose our influence in Saudi Arabia too.


- our political system is weakened - Not in the US. It will be biz as usual. Remember VietNam?
- a left-wing US government may take over - Maybe for a term or so, but that happens here every 8-12 years. Same two parties, same old crap.
- our troops will be severely demoralised - Not if the administration handles it correctly - exit with dignity. Someone needs a plan.
- our people will feel cheated in various ways - I will feel cheated if my kids go and die there for a buncha rags heads? for rich poli-corps? for oil? Screw that.
- outside countries will view us as weak powers - Soooo lets nuke the North Korea missle site and call it a day. Then they'll know better.
- we lose a foothold in an oil rich area - We need a different energy source. It's up to the west to develop it. Now. Screw oil. Let the monkeys eat it.
- radical Islam will seize Iraq and probably more will die per day than at present - I would worry more about the seizure of Europe by Islam, if I were you. Ditto the US.
- we would probably lose our influence in Saudi Arabia too. - Like when they went to China to cut a deal?

If oil is the reason, then energy is the solution. We need a better source.

But since the US/UK did the deed, we need to expedite whatever requirements enable us to exit. Maybe the Iraqi govt needs to knock off the hooka piping and get on the stick.

Still looking for solutions - not excuses - NiK
NiKfUrY69
 
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby NiKfUrY69 » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 13:14:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('donshan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NiKfUrY69', '
')
Realistic solutions wanted.... NiK


There are no "Realistic solutions" that are politically acceptable to Americans. We are like children that want their milk but want it produced without that smelly, dirty manure.

The fundamental problem is a century of Western interference in the MidEast because we need their cheap oil to sustain our energy guzzling lifestyle.

The "Realistic solution" is to immediately institute a fuel rationing system to reduce fuel demand so oil imports from all Muslim countries, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the Emirates could be cut to zero within a few months. The economic and lifestyle "hardships" of such a rationing system, would change the political atmosphere in dozens of ways to create a "Realistic" energy program to adjust to reality- the petroleum age is over!

With immediate rationing, we don't need MidEast oil, we can immediately withdraw our troops and stop interfering in the internal affairs of these countries.

I read that Iran is preparing to institute petrol rationing about September to reduce internal fuel consumption to the amount that they refine domestically, so that they can do without the aprox. 30% of refinined fuels they now import. Seems to me they are now preparing for an oil conflict.

Why isn't America immediately doing something "Realistic" about our "addiction to oil" which is the root cause of the conflict?


Thanks Don - yer right.

Conservation.
Revised mileage standards.
Mass transit incentives.
Fuel tax increases.
Alternative fuels.

.... to start.

How about a big ole Peak Oil boot up the ass of each and every politician in the US - National down to local dog catcher!

Yes, oil is the root cause and ultimatelly the conflict will more than go nuclear.

But sittin' in the middle of a bunch stone age kingdoms ain't gonna help anything but widow pensions.

Some one needs to set some arbitrary measurement for withdrawal so we at least have a goal.

NiK
NiKfUrY69
 
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby NiKfUrY69 » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 13:49:29

[quote="uNkNowN ElEmEnt]$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's ran by major political parties (the rich), that are paid off by mega corps/lobbyists (more rich), that ruin the average citizen (the poor & declining middle class) by exporting their jobs, holding down wages, leave them hanging in national disasters and force them to fight for corporate resources in other countries.

Probably the same for every one here, just too blind to notice or in denial.
Are you sure which web forum you are on? there are very few here that seem to buy into the crap that the US government (and its media dogs) seems to feed you people.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')isgusted - NiK
You aren't the only one my friend.[/quote]

++++++++++++++++++++++

Not sure what you're saying here, but let me show you some examples of what I mean, about this govt being neither "For" nor "of the people".

1. The govt won't raise the minimum wage but automatically give them selves a raise every year. By law.

2. The govt won't address the upcoming failure of social security, but continue to fund their own seperate private retirement accounts.

3. The govt won't adjust taxes for the poor, but want to exempt $5 million plus inheritances for thier rich bratty kids.

4. The govt continually increases H1B visas, from the present 65,000 annually to about 115,000 in 2007 and with a 20 per cent increase on an annual basis; while allowing tax exemption for foreign incomes of American companies as they export every job they can. Meanwhile importing cheap labor (amnesty for illegals) for all the low pay jobs.

5. The govt allows for the confiscation of private property for commercial development (supreme court decision).

Plenty more - just tired of typing.

Where exactly are the common people's interests represented here?

Or how about the proposed upcoming draft, because they need more folks die in thier stupid resource wars? And when was the last time you heard of some rich kid of a poli-corp dying in a war?

Those bought-and-paid-for folks in Washington represent only the interests of themselves and those of their class. And it ain't us workin' folks.

Don't group the govt with the citizen, we're not the same thing.

Still disgusted - NiK
NiKfUrY69
 
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby donshan » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 14:20:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SoothSayer', 'S')o what happens if we (the UK & the US) pull out?

That could mean:
- our political system is weakened
- a left-wing US government may take over
- our troops will be severely demoralised
- our people will feel cheated in various ways
- outside countries will view us as weak powers
- we lose a foothold in an oil rich area
- radical Islam will seize Iraq and probably more will die per day than at present
- we would probably lose our influence in Saudi Arabia too.

To summarise: We will end up separated from the oil areas, with a weak government and a dissillusioned army & populace. The US & UK probably could not mount a similar operation ever again. Pulling out could significantly threaten out future in the West.

Yep. Let's pull our troops out tomorrow. Might as well swallow cyanide whilst we are at it.

Image


I understand your position- it is widely held in the US. My view is the American people are woefully misinformed by the media, politicians and pundits as to the complexity of the threat we face, and everyone seeks simplistic solutions that sound good in a 15 second sound bite.

I would like to refer you to two outstanding essays that were prize winners in an essay contest sponsored by the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff. Both are written by serving military officers. Both are remarkable in receiving prize awards since they are at odds with current US political and military policies.

The first is by Lieutenant Colonel Michael F. Morris, USMC titled "al Qaeda as Insurgency". The paper can be downloaded at:

http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/jfq_pubs/1039.pdf

Col. Morris discusses military strategy and "who is our enemy?" You will find he concludes that our enemy is not confined to just Iraq, but identifies radical Islam known as Wahhabism which teaches "Salafist jihadist ideology as our main enemy. What Col. Morris probably could not say is this religious teaching is the State Religion of Saudi Arabia, and it is this teaching in hundreds of Islamic schools all over the Muslim world that are creating an endless supply of young jihadists.

It is this Jihadist teaching that lead to the bombings in Madrid and London, and the recent arrests of a jihadist bomb plot in Canada. We cannot win unless we understand our enemy, and our enemy is an ideology, not just insurgents in Iraq, with an endless supply of replacements.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')The Strategic Challenge

Such an assessment dictates a different kind of response at the strategic level. The conflict is between competing visions of Islam. Moderate Islam is willing and able to accommodate modernism; radical Islam insists that the religion return to the halcyon days of the 7th and 8th centuries. This is a kind of civil war, and the West is poorly positioned to referee it or encourage its end. The contest is not the venue of an information operation writ large. Rather it is the age-old debate on religion’s role in governance. Each people must make its own choice; Madison Avenue marketing and Western-style politics are neither necessary nor sufficient to sway the result. Instead, a sophisticated form of political warfare must support and encourage moderate governments that champion tolerant forms of the Islamic faith while opposing religious fascism. The National Security and Combating Terrorism strategies mention but do not stress this war of ideas. It deserves more emphasis and attention because failure in this arena will render moot even the destruction of al Qaeda. Osama bin Laden’s movement is merely representative of the threat posed by Salafist theology. Other groups, though less well known, harbor similar political objectives and the conflict will continue until the underlying ideas are rejected by the Muslim umma. The threat posed by radical Islam today resembles that posed in 1917 by communism—a bad idea poised to justify the spread of totalitarianism."


The other prize winner was by Lt. Col John M. Amidon, USAF titled " America’s Strategic Imperative: A “Manhattan Project” for Energy". Col Amidon goes though an analysis of the military costs of defending our MidEast Oil supply, discusses peak oil, and alternatives and concludes america could solve the energy problem more cheaply by a non-military "Manhattan" Style energy program. He calculates military costs in the MidEast have cost American tax payers $1.28 per each gallon of fuel used:

Link to pdf file is:

http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/jfq_pubs/1339.pdf


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')merica’s Strategic Imperative
The current world energy situation poses a national threatunparalleled in 225 years. The economy, particularly the transportation component, has become heavily dependent on foreign oil. Concurrent with rising demand are indications that world production may soon peak, followed by permanent decline and shortage. Moreover, most of the remaining oil is concentrated in distant, politically hostile locations, inviting interdiction by enemies.

Over the last 60 years, policymakers have repeatedly applied diplomatic and military triage to the problem of national energy security while generally ignoring the economic prospects for a solution. Today, the Nation is engaged in a global war on terror throughout the same resource-rich area on which the safety of its economy hinges.
Economicstagnation or catastrophe lurk close at hand, to be triggered by another embargo, collapse of the Saudi monarchy, or civil disorder in any of a dozen nations. Barring these events, rising world demand and falling productioncould place the United States in direct military competition with equally determined nations. It is doubtful that any military, even that of a global hegemon, could secure an oil lifeline indefinitely. Failing to take urgent economic steps now will necessitate more painful economic steps later and likely require protracted military action.

Meeting this dilemma with a technical solution plays on America’s greatest strengths, those of the inventor and the innovator. Rapid execution of a two-phase Manhattan Project for energy will provide near-term relief measures while laying the foundation for the long-term establishment of an “Energy Power Shift” economy. Reduced dependence on imported oil would also allow the Nation to pursue a more pragmatic foreign policy, freed of the necessity to engage in all episodes of Middle East or OPEC history. This strategy denies al Qaeda and its allies a key argument in their war against the United States; reducing the strategic importance of the Middle East will obviate the need for “us” to be “there” and diminish the cultural friction between Muslims and the West. Absent the plausible charge that the U.S. role in the Middle East is motivated solely by oil, U.S. efforts to nurture democracy, and local perception of those efforts, could result in a new era of good will."
An expert is someone who has made every mistake possible in their field and learned how to prevent them.
donshan
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed 12 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Washington State, USA
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby aflurry » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 15:58:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SoothSayer', '[')b]Maybe this attitude of valuing ourselves more than others is part of why.

I value myself & my family & my friends and possibly my neighbours more than others.

I would be worried if anyone expressed any different opinion about themselves or their family.


And other americans should be considered as "friends and family" on the basis of what?
User avatar
aflurry
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby SoothSayer » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 17:09:11

Thanks for your post donshan.

Having worked for some years for a large high tech company in a very Moslem area of a British city I have become 100% convinced that a "Clash of Civilisations" is unavoidable.

There has been - and still is - too much appeasement to Moslems in the West.

In the UK we have had MUCH more media coverage of the Brazilian who was accidentally shot, and of attempts to "bond" with the Moslem community than we have had of the poor people blown to pieces in the London attacks.

One UK city police chief even made all his officers wear Moslem ribbons after the bombings to show "community spirit".

In my opinion we are in a slow motion war with Islam and retreat of any sort will be regarded as weakness.

Losing Iraq (even if the original invasion was stupid) will simply accelerate the pace of global Islamification.

It's time to play hard ball - especially as energy resources fade - or will we simply lose the game.

The Islamic hardliners must be laughing at all the Chomsky style introspection going on in the USA at the moment. They know that the tough America of old is rotting from within.
Technology will save us!
User avatar
SoothSayer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby untothislast » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 18:08:45

Would anyone like to hazard a guess at how much the US has spent - cumulatively - on armaments, R&D and military campaigns since, say, 1945?*

Whatever figure you can come up with, reflect that the merest fraction of that expenditure - expressed in the form of a doctrine of benevolent goodwill - might have done so much to reinvigorate and win over those parts of the world currently serving as recruiting grounds for terrorist organisations. Ultimately, the US' jackboot diplomacy will be its own ultimate undoing. The only (temporary) winners being scum like Halliburton.

(Hint: $455bn - in 2004 alone)
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Thu 22 Jun 2006, 21:34:44

I hate to break it to you, but you don't have a democracy. IN the democracy first described by socrates the people who are elected are done so "by the people". You don't you have a select group of people or the "party" chooses a couple different people and they elect one of those to be the candidate for the party.

then the parties put their puppet up before the people so that they can pretend that die bold machine don't select the winner or the next president of the US. See you don't get to elect the best person for the job, you get to pretend to pick one of the people they've chosen for you.

In a democracy people throw their hats in the ring and the nation chooses among these people. there is no pre selection.

I know this will really piss you guys off but Cuba is actually closer to a "real" democracy than you people are. they have regional elections and these people are the contenders for the national presidency. CAstro has been democratically elected every time. Ha doesn't that jsut piss you off? shows you just how much truth gets through the USA propaganda.

Yeah, we know you are told he's a dictator, but that is just what they want you to think. same with chavez, they totally want you to think he's a totalitarian who took power illegally. but he didn't. see you guys may be brain washed but the rest of us know better.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: The two US soldiers were tortured barbarically

Unread postby NiKfUrY69 » Fri 23 Jun 2006, 16:32:17

Sssshhh - don't tell anyone, but its "Officially" a republic.

But yeah, "the people" are hosed no matter what its called.

As for any president for life ............ yeah, democracy.

Like when Jeb Bush gets the presidency.

* Yawn *

Did we ever come up with a way to bring the troops home?

Later - NiK
NiKfUrY69
 

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron