by nocar » Wed 21 Jun 2006, 12:07:14
From the linked article starting this thread:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')r Tibaijuka told journalists that urbanisation in itself was not the problem as it drove both national output and rural development.
"History has shown that urbanisation cannot be reversed," she continued.
I take issue with the statement that urbanisation cannot be reversed. In the world wars in the 20th century, people moved away from cities. Perhaps you will discount that example due to extreme circumstances. OK, it is true that generallyl through modern times, cities have grown, both absolutely and relatively to urban populations. But then a fundamental reason has been the same:ever increased energy use, and ever cheaper food with ever cheaper transport going into cities.
When food gets more expensive in cities than in the country (in relation to the time needed to earn money to pay for it), the direction of the tide will change, and people will move away from cities, or at least stop moving there.
My doomer scenario: Increased child mortality and shorter life-spans due to malnutrition and more accidents and diseases will stop the increase in global population. Land that is not used today will be farmed, like the dividing strips on superhighways. Suburban people will grow food in suburban lots,for fresh produce, but will buy grain in the store. Much like the Russian seem to have done, except they bought subsidised bread in the stores. Golf courses will be transformed to allotments for growing food.
When I was a child 50 years ago there was a strong taboo or moral principle against wasting food or using food for anything else but food. This taboo seemed a bit ridiculus at the time, but certainly was based on a collective memory of past famines. In my scenario, this taboo will reappear. Fueling cars with food products will be seen as immoral. Bicycles made for transporting cargo will be very common. and railroads will see a revival.
Higher education will be less common. Only their agricultural departments will have lots of students. University parking lots will be turned into experimental farms. With fewer students, fewer classrooms will be needed, but with less commuting, both staff and students will live on campus. Some classrooms will be turned into residential apartments.
Perhaps some type of serfdom might appear. Mobility will for most people be fastest/most convenient by bicycle. But I do not believe in general mob war and shooting, everyone against everyone, marauding, because it must be a very strenuous way to make a living. People willl organise in better ways.
nocar